Poll: alphabet ideology losing ground with public

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
166,652
56,274
Woods
✟4,677,189.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Now this is interesting.

According to the Public Religion Research Institute, Americans’ attitudes to the alphabet ideology have been hardening, and the numbers don’t look so good if you are a proponent of the madness.

PRRI polled more than 5000 Americans–a huge sample for a poll, and one for which a ton of money had to be paid–and there has been a significant shift away from the basic tenets of the gender ideology that has been shoved down our throats by everybody in the Establishment over the past couple of years.

Political debates about gender identity have become heated in recent years, as some state legislatures have increasingly sought to restrict transgender rights. Battles over how — or even if — sexual orientation and gender identity should be discussed in public schools are also erupting at school boards nationally, amid larger frustrations with public education that have emerged in the wake of the pandemic and other social tumult.

This new study of more than 5,000 Americans takes a closer look at Americans’ views on gender identity and what is appropriate to teach in public schools with respect to sexual orientation and gender identity. We also gauge Americans’ comfort levels with the idea of a friend using gender-neutral pronouns or pronouns that may not match the respondent’s perception of their friend’s gender. We also ask Americans their thoughts about the age at which children should receive sex education in public schools and what content is appropriate. We consider how partisanship, religion, media trust, parental status, and generation relate to people’s views on these matters. We also consider how knowing people who are LGBTQ influences such views.


It was less than 3 years ago that Joe Biden was elected to the White House, and while everybody knew that he was a longtime proponent of gay rights–he came out for gay marriage long before President Obama did, and actually annoyed Obama by taking a stand on the subject–I think it is fair to say that few Americans had any idea where Slow Joe’s Leftism would take him.

I suspect that if Joe had trotted out Admiral Levine or Assistant Secretary Luggage Thief as future appointments, that alone might have cost him the election. Almost nobody, I think it is fair to say, anticipated that the Administration would become an actual freak show. We expected more Pete Buttigiegs, not Sam Brintons.

Continued below.
 

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
19,746
3,720
Midlands
Visit site
✟563,853.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It is becoming plainly evident what their plans are. They want your kids. Period. Somehow it got past the MSM efforts to hide it from people. Once people realize this is not a "human rights" issue and opposition to their plans have nothing to do with "hating," they both get wise and begin to eye with suspicion those who have been lying to them.
No, you cannot have our kids.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Angels Team
Feb 10, 2013
14,537
8,399
28
Nebraska
✟243,511.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
It is becoming plainly evident what their plans are. They want you kids. Period. Somehow it got past the MSM efforts to hide it from people. Once people realize this is not a "human rights" issue and opposition to their plans have nothing to do with "hating," they both get wise and begin to eye with suspicion those who have been lying to them.
No, you cannot have our kids.
Amen
 
  • Like
Reactions: ralliann
Upvote 0