-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Please Provide Historical Proof That Peter Was The First Pope.
- Thread starter ProAmerican
- Start date
- Feb 7, 2005
- 13,055
- 491
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
it all contains the teaching of Y-shua and his apostles. What difference does it make when it was finalized? now, how bout some scripture.
Upvote
0
- Jul 6, 2004
- 25,292
- 2,868
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
stone said:
Are you therefore concluding that all the teachings of Jesus are contained in scripture?
Forgive me....
Upvote
0
- Jul 6, 2004
- 25,292
- 2,868
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
- Jul 6, 2004
- 25,292
- 2,868
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
stone said:
True... but not everything about Christiainity is scriptural.
Forgive me...
Upvote
0
- Feb 7, 2005
- 13,055
- 491
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
tell me about it,
we have strayed far
i really have got to keep away from these kinds of threads for awhile.
we have strayed far
i really have got to keep away from these kinds of threads for awhile.
Upvote
0
- Feb 7, 2005
- 13,055
- 491
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
no., sorry, that was to the op, as far as historical proof goes that is.
I'll have to start quoteing what i'm posting to from here on, to not create such misunderstandings inthe future.
I'll have to start quoteing what i'm posting to from here on, to not create such misunderstandings inthe future.
Upvote
0
- Feb 7, 2005
- 13,055
- 491
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
scripture and man made traditions don't qualify as the same kinds of historical proof when you are speaking of the things of father. From here we all branch off in different directions according to doctrines of man.
Upvote
0
Scott_LaFrance said:If you're not posting, then why are you posting?
OOOps. LOL!
Apparently, I don't know what I'm doing. Not only am I not posting, but I'm not posting the right information either. :o
Upvote
0
jckstraw72
Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
- Dec 9, 2005
- 10,160
- 1,145
- 41
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Engaged
- Politics
- US-Republican
Im curious--do you believe what they teach you about Alexander the Great in school? Cause you know the earliest biography we have of him is from 1000 yrs after his death. Your insistence that there be a specific writing pre-125 makes no sense and is really just poopy.
Upvote
0
jckstraw72
Doin' that whole Orthodox thing
- Dec 9, 2005
- 10,160
- 1,145
- 41
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Engaged
- Politics
- US-Republican
according to this logic, once the book of Acts turns to Paul, Peter ceases to exist.
this logic also makes me want to gouge my eyes out and replace them with grapenuts.
Upvote
0
jckstraw72 said:
Well, history has been known to be wrong. But, in the case of Peter being in Rome, historical evidence shows Peter and Paul to both have been in Rome and martyred there. Now, here's the right link from Ireneaus, not Ignatius:
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ix.iv.iv.html#ix.iv.iv-p2.3
Upvote
0
Similar threads
