• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

PLEASE learn to debate in a Christian context.

Status
Not open for further replies.

BT

Fanatic
Jan 29, 2003
2,320
221
51
Canada
Visit site
✟3,880.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Ok why this thread? Because I reckon that there are many who have a good knowledge of scripture here yet can not seem to close a debate. The point of debate ought to be to learn, not to be right all of the time. And the majority of debating that I see here tends to circle and circle and circle. Why? Because we have missed out on the key of scriptural debate.

Here is what typically happens (at least in my observation).

The 1st person will state an idea and a bunch of scripture to back it up.

The next person in will say, "oh yeah, but what about these scriptures..." and post a bunch of seemingly contradictory scriptures.

It is right here at the onset that the key of scriptural debate has been lost.

OK?
Here's the principle. (This only applies to Baptist/Anabaptists what the rest of them do in their own forums is none of my concern)

We believe (at least I hope I can say "we") that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, given by inspiration, and is perfect. If this is so you can not use the Bible to disprove the Bible. Either it is all true or none of it is true.

Therefore your first objective in scriptural debate is to state how the original verses have been misinterpreted. Then, and only then, do you have an avenue to present your scriptures that show the opposite of the OPs opinion. You will never persuade someone that their idea is wrong if they sincerly believe that the Scriptures are telling them something. So you MUST clarify the scripture first. This should be done in a gentle and humble way. Soapboxes don't help anyone.

Now that is the key, but we can add some principles to guide our understanding.

1) Don't (automatically) go Greek. Especially if you don't know Greek.

There is value in the original languages but I have found, after learning Greek, that the KJV in English is more than sufficient. When cutting and pasting some Greek from a computer program you'll find yourself in big trouble when you come upon someone who has actually studied the language. Greek is complex and remember that not all "scholars" agree on all points of translation (or manuscripts for that matter). So if you start to toss Greek around you may actually end up more confused than when you start. (remember: I'm talking about trying to prove points in a debate-style thread).

2) Be wary of Commentaries. (Hey that rhymes!)

Commentaries are great sources for personal study and clarification, but when you try to use them to prove your points, you may end up in trouble. Absolutely no one agrees with anyone commentary. Personally when it comes to interpretation I couldn't care less what Matthew Henry has to say, or Martin Luther or any other man. Illumination is the ministry of the Holy Spirit and I trust in Him alone. This, of course, does not mean that I never use commentaries. Rather I mean that I do not treat them as authoritative.

3) Don't try to "win" a debate.

If that's your motivation, then frankly you've already lost.

4) Seek to reach and teach.

The truth IN LOVE is our goal. To the edification of the saints (which is all of us, not just you ;) ) is our call. This is being "wise as serpents, gentle as doves." The cause of Christ is never moved forward by pontification (Bleecher's will love that statement!).

5) Be open to the truth that you may be wrong.

I find this more often than not is the problem. Human beings will often continue with an argument or debate even when they know that they are wrong. This is the utmost of silliness. (But I could be wrong :p ).


6) Guard your emotions!

ACK!
If you are getting emotionally wound up, leave the debate for awhile and come back to it when your spirit is settled. Emotions are a deceiver. Don't be led by them. There is no room for "righteous wrath" in here because it is more often than not "self-righteous wrath".

7) Love each other.
 

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
48
Toronto, Ontario
✟17,960.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
BT said:
We believe (at least I hope I can say "we") that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, given by inspiration, and is perfect. If this is so you can not use the Bible to disprove the Bible. Either it is all true or none of it is true.

Therefore your first objective in scriptural debate is to state how the original verses have been misinterpreted. Then, and only then, do you have an avenue to present your scriptures that show the opposite of the OPs opinion. You will never persuade someone that their idea is wrong if they sincerly believe that the Scriptures are telling them something. So you MUST clarify the scripture first. This should be done in a gentle and humble way. Soapboxes don't help anyone.
A lot of times, it isn't that one person has misinterpreted scripture while the other person has it right. A common point of disagreement is when one person overemphasizes a particular passage over the exclusion of other passages that are also relevant to the discussion. So the second person is bringing other passages to the table that can help balance out our view of what the whole of scripture says about something and not just what one particular verse says. Nobody I've seen is trying to disprove the bible. We are all trying to submit to its divine revelations which are not perfectly held in any one particular person's belief.

Anway, good post and I hope we can continue having civil and biblical debates in a spirit of love and truth where we discover the wonders of God's revelation together. :)
 
Upvote 0
May 11, 2004
4,273
123
Fortress Kedar
✟28,653.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
BT said:
1) Don't (automatically) go Greek. Especially if you don't know Greek.

There is value in the original languages but I have found, after learning Greek, that the KJV in English is more than sufficient. When cutting and pasting some Greek from a computer program you'll find yourself in big trouble when you come upon someone who has actually studied the language. Greek is complex and remember that not all "scholars" agree on all points of translation (or manuscripts for that matter). So if you start to toss Greek around you may actually end up more confused than when you start. (remember: I'm talking about trying to prove points in a debate-style thread).
Amen to this! So many people have no clue about the Greek language and its complexities, then try to cut and paste. In reality, it only makes them look silly.
 
Upvote 0

bleechers

Christ Our Passover!
Apr 8, 2004
967
74
Alabama
Visit site
✟1,509.00
Faith
Christian
In general agreement except that sometimes going around in "circles" is useful. Not if each party just keeps reiterating the same points, but if there is movement towards either point or if the parties can clarify their points to be better understood then...

Gold Dragon (you need a new handle, I can't abbreviate Gold Dragon if you get my drift) and I spent a number of posts going back and forth and the end result was a meeting of the minds. We were able to clarify to the point that we could see each other's argument and come to a place of agreement... maybe that's what PMs are for, but in the context of the thread, I thought it was profitable. :sorry:

I'll try to be more careful in future :) but we Italians are very emotional people (although we still want to keep the kissing to a minimum!) and sometimes can't help ourselves. Just be thankful that I'm a slow, lousy typist. It keeps my posts to a reasonable length.

:wave:
 
Upvote 0

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
48
Toronto, Ontario
✟17,960.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I agree bleechers. It was a profitable experience for me too and helped me to understand and respect dispensationalism more although I still disagree with it. A lot of times, we get tangled in words, definitions and language that carry a different connotation for the person we are disagreeing with. A civil discussion to clarify what we mean can usually thresh those nuances out. I hope this experience will help us come to a place of agreement a little quicker next time. :)

As for my handle, I have used it since my first message board on the net and it has sentimental significance. So it would be hard for me to part with it. Some have shortened it to Gold when in a hurry.

I'm not a very emotional person, much to the chagrin of my wife.
 
Upvote 0

BT

Fanatic
Jan 29, 2003
2,320
221
51
Canada
Visit site
✟3,880.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I'm not talking about conversations.... but debates. In particular look back at a few of the "calvinist" "chats" that we've had around here. In those talks the verses go flying. Two people try to disprove each other's scriptures with scriptures. In one case I spent an hour exegeting some scriptures that I guy was using way out of context to prove his point. What was his answer once he saw that his scriptures were out of whack? Well what about these ones....lalala

I've spent literally 4 hours exegeting scriptures for a Word of Faith cult follower and all I ever get is... Ok so those don't mean what I thought.. what about these....lalalala

Some "catholic" discussions go that road too (some, or a lot).

Those are the circular debates that are fruitless... If you guys want to have a discussion that swirls around in circles until you agree to disagree or through that process come to a conclusion. Feel free. I'm not talking about discussions. I'm talking about fruitless debates.

You have to forgive me for being a little intense. I've spent the past two weeks in a bad way (theologically). One week studying fake signs and wonders for a sermon that I had to do (my topics are often given to me). And one week refuting Calvinism for a course I'm taking at Seminary. So I'm nearly at the end of my patience.
 
Upvote 0

BT

Fanatic
Jan 29, 2003
2,320
221
51
Canada
Visit site
✟3,880.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
BronxBriar said:
Isn't there a special place for debate? Honestly BT...all those rules makes me feel like I'm in an over-55 gated community in south Florida.
Yeah there is a debate section. Go there if you want to rip hair out of your head in handfuls...
 
Upvote 0

BT

Fanatic
Jan 29, 2003
2,320
221
51
Canada
Visit site
✟3,880.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Gold Dragon said:
A lot of times, it isn't that one person has misinterpreted scripture while the other person has it right. A common point of disagreement is when one person overemphasizes a particular passage over the exclusion of other passages that are also relevant to the discussion. So the second person is bringing other passages to the table that can help balance out our view of what the whole of scripture says about something and not just what one particular verse says.
This is only true I find in cases where the extra passages are those surrounding the passage at hand. This is a valuable tool as well.


Nobody I've seen is trying to disprove the bible.
No offense brother, but you're new here. Give it time....

We are all trying to submit to its divine revelations which are not perfectly held in any one particular person's belief.
So let us give up trying to perfectly hold the revelation, right? I find that there is very little submission while there is a whole lot of profession. That no one is "perfect" seems to be a cop-out in most cases. I'm not perfect so I might as well not try. I seem to recall a blasphemous statement that someone made yesterday on rating the Bible 'R' (and thus unsuitable for children). I suppose that whoever said that was attempting to be submissive. Probably to that one the book of Ephesians is "not for this dispensation" LOL.

Ephesians 5:1-4 Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children; And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour.
But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;
Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.
 
Upvote 0

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
48
Toronto, Ontario
✟17,960.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
BT said:
So let us give up trying to perfectly hold the revelation, right? I find that there is very little submission while there is a whole lot of profession. That no one is "perfect" seems to be a cop-out in most cases. I'm not perfect so I might as well not try.
Quite the contrary. We should be continually striving for better understanding of that revelation and submitting to it, with the understanding that we could be wrong and others that don't agree with us may grasp a different aspect of that revelation better. There is also the understanding that revelation also has a personal level because of the holy spirit and what the Spirit reveals to me does not necessarily apply to everyone. But some things do apply to everyone and discerning that difference is difficult.

BT said:
I seem to recall a blasphemous statement that someone made yesterday on rating the Bible 'R' (and thus unsuitable for children). I suppose that whoever said that was attempting to be submissive. Probably to that one the book of Ephesians is "not for this dispensation" LOL.
I hope you understood that was a joke. My point was that the reasons you stated why the Matrix couldn't have Christian themes was because of strong language, sex, nudity and violence: all things that are also found in the Bible. I am a person who doesn't object to either the Matrix or the Bible, although I understand that we have ratings on movies because children are not ready for some of the more adult themes addressed in some movies.

In no way do I consider the bible unsuitable for children, although some passages are.

BT said:
Ephesians 5:1-4 Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children; And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour.
But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;
Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.
Thanks BT.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.