• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Pi: the Athiests strawman.

Status
Not open for further replies.

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I just read through yet another tortured thread where athiests and others claim that the bible mistakenly says pi=3.

NathanGreen had it right. There is nothing in the account that can be used to determine pi one way or the other.

I wanted to start a new thread in order to present the actual facts that refute their claim, and do so in the OP. Here again is the scripture in question:

1 Kings 7:

23And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.

26And it was an hand breadth thick, and the brim thereof was wrought like the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies: it contained two thousand baths.

Notice that the 'brim' was formed like the brim of a cup, bent or curved outward from the main cylinderical body. The brim measurement of 10 cubits would then necessarily be slightly greater than a perfect 'pi' calculation.

In fact if you did apply pi to the circumference measurement you would have the actual diameter of 9.55 cubits. This reveals that the brim stuck outwards .45 cubits or about 4 inches all around. It was the outward shaped brim that measured ten cubits across, not the diameter of the main body of the laver.

Most high school students with average reading comprehension, and who have passed high school geometry could probbly figger this one out.

Soooooooo, why can't you guys? :scratch: :confused: :scratch: :confused:

owg (B's in English, A's in Geometry.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.