Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Physical universe vs spiritual realm
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ophiolite" data-source="post: 71876567" data-attributes="member: 234799"><p>But you did suggest that calling the spiritual realm "another dimension" might <em>be more acceptable to the scientific community. </em>What on Earth would make you think using a scientific term incorrectly would be acceptable to the scientific community? You absolutely did not think that through!</p><p></p><p>Citation required. (Such speculation verges on pseudoscience, or is employed to get air time on third rate documentaries. If you have a genuine example, provide the details here and I shall likely be persuaded.)</p><p></p><p>Since I don't suffer from that particular affliction that is irrelevant to me.</p><p></p><p>If you are talking about the vast body of evidence, collected over the course of more than two centuries, from the fields of palaeontology, botany, zoology, microbiology, embryology, anatomy and genetics that support the reality of evolution and the modern synthesis that accounts for it, then you are being dishonest with yourself. If you won't open your eyes, I cannot help you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ophiolite, post: 71876567, member: 234799"] But you did suggest that calling the spiritual realm "another dimension" might [I]be more acceptable to the scientific community. [/I]What on Earth would make you think using a scientific term incorrectly would be acceptable to the scientific community? You absolutely did not think that through! Citation required. (Such speculation verges on pseudoscience, or is employed to get air time on third rate documentaries. If you have a genuine example, provide the details here and I shall likely be persuaded.) Since I don't suffer from that particular affliction that is irrelevant to me. If you are talking about the vast body of evidence, collected over the course of more than two centuries, from the fields of palaeontology, botany, zoology, microbiology, embryology, anatomy and genetics that support the reality of evolution and the modern synthesis that accounts for it, then you are being dishonest with yourself. If you won't open your eyes, I cannot help you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Physical universe vs spiritual realm
Top
Bottom