• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Physical Affection

Status
Not open for further replies.

Caedmon

kawaii
Site Supporter
Dec 18, 2001
17,359
570
R'lyeh
✟94,383.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,736.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Today at 12:12 AM humblejoe said this in Post #16

LOL! I'm sorry! I didn't know any other way to ask it. :o

Please be patient with me. I need to ask difficult questions. I want to stay pure.


Joe, I think it would depend on your level of self restraint.  If you feel that you can't make out with a girl without it leading to inevitable sin, then don't do it. :)

Michelle
 
Upvote 0

Caedmon

kawaii
Site Supporter
Dec 18, 2001
17,359
570
R'lyeh
✟94,383.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Others
Today at 01:41 PM Miss Shelby said this in Post #22 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=703239#post703239)

Joe, I think it would depend on your level of self restraint.  If you feel that you can't make out with a girl without it leading to inevitable sin, then don't do it. :)

But how would you define "inevitable sin"? Is that sexual intercourse?

If it was me, I would classify "mak[ing] out", itself, as sin.
 
Upvote 0

Caedmon

kawaii
Site Supporter
Dec 18, 2001
17,359
570
R'lyeh
✟94,383.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Others
Yesterday at 11:44 PM humblejoe said this in Post #14 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=702149#post702149)

So you feel it is perfectly acceptable and sinless for a male in a premarital relationship to purposefully achieve and maintain an erection by engaging in prolonged kissing?

Could someone -- preferably an adult Catholic male -- please address this question for me? If you feel uncomfortable addressing it publically, feel free to PM me.
 
Upvote 0

Caedmon

kawaii
Site Supporter
Dec 18, 2001
17,359
570
R'lyeh
✟94,383.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Others
Alright, what is the difference between these two scenarios:

1. A male in a premarital relationship purposefully achieves and maintains sexual arousal through prolonged kissing.

2. A male in a premarital relationship purposefully achieves and maintains sexual arousal through prolonged kissing accompanied by "light petting".

Both of these scenarios achieve the same ends. I ask you, what is the difference? How can one be a sin, and the other not be a sin?

Edit: I clarified scenario No. 2.
 
Upvote 0

seebs

God Made Me A Skeptic
Apr 9, 2002
31,917
1,530
20
Saint Paul, MN
Visit site
✟70,235.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Tell 'ya what. I'll answer your question badly, then one of the Catholics will have to step in and correct me!

My thinking is that there's categories of things where the sinfulness is determined not just by ends, but by means; certain boundaries are drawn.

That said, if it feels sinful to you, don't do it. Easier said than done, but probably the right solution.
 
Upvote 0

chelcb

'Totus tuus'
Jan 11, 2003
2,013
0
55
Visit site
✟2,163.00
I am not a man but I will tell you what,

It is wrong to get yourself aroused knowing you are not married to the person and can not finished the act.

I have heard priest say that this is wrong. I have heard priest say that once your dating after a normal amount of time you either need to marry or get out, anything else is sinful.

I have heard people try to say that they live with their boyfriends/girlfreinds and nothing happens, I have heard priest say to them that they are in sin.

So take this for what ever it is worth. YOU have to discern what is in your heart.
 
Upvote 0

Evening Mist

gentle mother
Feb 7, 2003
751
19
52
Delaware
Visit site
✟997.00
Faith
Christian
Alright, what is the difference between these two scenarios:

1. A male in a premarital relationship purposefully achieves and maintains sexual arousal through prolonged kissing.

2. A male in a premarital relationship purposefully achieves and maintains sexual arousal through "petting".


Argh. I am not Catholic, and I am not a man. But I can't resist because this seems really obvious to me. It isn't just about what you are doing to yourself, it is about what you are doing to the woman you are with. I'm sorry to be so very blunt, but would you see a difference between 1) her enjoying the sensation of kissing you, 2) her enjoying the sensation of fondling you? I bet you would.

In the same way, when you are "petting" a girl you are treating her in a way that is different than when you are just kissing her. You are affecting her - and in a real way, taking something from her. Trust me, from a girl's perspective, there is a HUGE difference between being kissed and being "petted."

The sin involved is not gaged just by how *you* are effected, but also by what you are doing to the other person.


*slinking my non-male non-Catholic little self out of here.........
 
Upvote 0

Caedmon

kawaii
Site Supporter
Dec 18, 2001
17,359
570
R'lyeh
✟94,383.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Others
Today at 10:55 PM Evening Mist said this in Post #29 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=704648#post704648)

Argh. I am not Catholic, and I am not a man. But I can't resist because this seems really obvious to me. It isn't just about what you are doing to yourself, it is about what you are doing to the woman you are with. I'm sorry to be so very blunt, but would you see a difference between 1) her enjoying the sensation of kissing you, 2) her enjoying the sensation of fondling you? I bet you would.

In the same way, when you are "petting" a girl you are treating her in a way that is different than when you are just kissing her. You are affecting her - and in a real way, taking something from her. Trust me, from a girl's perspective, there is a HUGE difference between being kissed and being "petted."

The sin involved is not gaged just by how *you* are effected, but also by what you are doing to the other person.


*slinking my non-male non-Catholic little self out of here.........

That's not exactly what I meant in No. 2. What I meant was, "roaming of the hands", presumably in addition to kissing. Sorry for the confusion.
 
Upvote 0

Caedmon

kawaii
Site Supporter
Dec 18, 2001
17,359
570
R'lyeh
✟94,383.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Caedmon

kawaii
Site Supporter
Dec 18, 2001
17,359
570
R'lyeh
✟94,383.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Others
Perhaps I need to clarify my position. When I say "petting", I do not mean heavy or exclusive petting. What I mean is grabbing someone's butt, or rubbing their back, etc., while the prolonged kissing is being engaged in.

Disclaimer: Sorry, I don't know a better word for butt.
 
Upvote 0

Caedmon

kawaii
Site Supporter
Dec 18, 2001
17,359
570
R'lyeh
✟94,383.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Others
My point is, I believe that both prolonged kissing, and prolonged kissing with "light petting," are both sins.

Edit: The reason why I made this statement, is because someone argued earlier that prolonged kissing was not sinful if not accompanied by "roaming hands." My position is that both No. 1 and No. 2 achieve the same ends, and by that reasoning, prolonged kissing by itself is, indeed, sinful.
 
Upvote 0

Caedmon

kawaii
Site Supporter
Dec 18, 2001
17,359
570
R'lyeh
✟94,383.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Caedmon

kawaii
Site Supporter
Dec 18, 2001
17,359
570
R'lyeh
✟94,383.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Others
Today at 12:04 PM Evening Mist said this in Post #36 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=705651#post705651)

Oh no offense here. Thanks for checking though.

It is good that you are working through this.

I'm trying really hard to understand things. I feel embarrassed that I didn't understand what you were talking about with girls. :( But I understand it better now, which I wouldn't have, had I not talked about it. Thank you EM. I always seem to work through things in a fiery fury. Go figure... :scratch:
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.