• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Peter's Vision

Is this passage a green light to violate YHWH's Torah?

  • Yes

    Votes: 4 22.2%
  • No

    Votes: 12 66.7%
  • Not in a box. Not with a fox.

    Votes: 2 11.1%

  • Total voters
    18

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,911
Georgia
✟1,094,317.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Everything you said applies to you more than me. I do harmonize scripture anything the disciples wrote must be interpreted to agree with what Jesus said not the wrong way round as you are doing.
You are the one chopping sections of the Bible out to make it appear to support you assumptions/presuppositions.
Just because some gentiles were in one synagogue does not mean all gentiles were permitted in all synagogues.


Acts 13 GENTILES ask that the gospel be presented to them "The NEXT Sabbath"
Acts 17:1-5 - Jews AND gentiles getting converted in the synagogues.
Acts 17:11-13 - Jews AND gentiles getting converted
Acts 18:4-11 Jews AND gentiles getting converted in the synagogues and returning for more gospel preaching "every Sabbath" Acts 18:4
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Acts 13 GENTILES ask that the gospel be presented to them "The NEXT Sabbath"
Acts 17:1-5 - Jews AND gentiles getting converted in the synagogues.
Acts 17:11-13 - Jews AND gentiles getting converted
Acts 18:4-11 Jews AND gentiles getting converted in the synagogues and returning for more gospel preaching "every Sabbath" Acts 18:4
You should have read the rest of my post.
Just because some gentiles were in some synagogues does not mean all gentiles were permitted in all synagogues.
The following are a few verses where Jews persecuted the apostles.

Acts of the apostles 4:5-6
5 And it came to pass on the morrow, that their rulers, and elders, and scribes,
6 And Annas the high priest, and Caiaphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem.
Acts of the apostles 4:17-19
17 But that it spread no further among the people, let us straitly threaten them, that they speak henceforth to no man in this name.
18 And they called them, and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus.
19 But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye.
Acts of the apostles 4:5-6
5 And it came to pass on the morrow, that their rulers, and elders, and scribes,
6 And Annas the high priest, and Caiaphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem.
Acts of the apostles 5:17-18
17 Then the high priest rose up, and all they that were with him, (which is the sect of the Sadducees,) and were filled with indignation,
18 And laid their hands on the apostles, and put them in the common prison.
acts of the apostles 5:26
Then went the captain with the officers, and brought them without violence: for they feared the people, lest they should have been stoned.
Acts of the apostles Act 5:33
33 When they heard that, they were cut to the heart, and took counsel to slay them.
Acts of the apostles 5:40
40 And to him they agreed: and when they had called the apostles, and beaten them, they commanded that they should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go.
Acts of the apostles 6:9
9 Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is called the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia and of Asia, disputing with Stephen.
acts of the apostles Act 7:59
59 And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.

Acts of the apostles 12:1-2
1 Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth his hands to vex certain of the church.
2 And he killed James the brother of John with the sword.
Acts of the apostles 12:3
3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.)
Acts of the apostles 13:50
50 But the Jews stirred up the devout and honourable women, and the chief men of the city, and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and expelled them out of their coasts.
Acts of the apostles 14:5
5 And when there was an assault made both of the Gentiles, and also of the Jews with their rulers, to use them despitefully, and to stone them,
Acts of the apostles 14:19
19 And there came thither certain Jews from Antioch and Iconium, who persuaded the people, and, having stoned Paul, drew him out of the city, supposing he had been dead.
Acts of the apostles 16:19
19 And when her masters saw that the hope of their gains was gone, they caught Paul and Silas, and drew them into the marketplace unto the rulers,
Acts of the apostles 16:22
22 And the multitude rose up together against them: and the magistrates rent off their clothes, and commanded to beat them.
Acts of the apostles 17:5
5 But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people.
Acts of the apostles 17:13
13 But when the Jews of Thessalonica had knowledge that the word of God was preached of Paul at Berea, they came thither also, and stirred up the people.
Acts of the apostles 18:12
12 And when Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, the Jews made insurrection with one accord against Paul, and brought him to the judgment seat,
Acts of the apostles 21:27-28
27 And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and laid hands on him,
28 Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place.
Acts of the apostles 23:12
12 And when it was day, certain of the Jews banded together, and bound themselves under a curse, saying that they would neither eat nor drink till they had killed Paul.


 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Jesus’ name derived from the Hebrew Yahoshua, meaning Yahweh is salvation.
All the fury of Israel can not obliterate Jesus.
A name that never existed cannot be obliterated.
Jewish Encyclopedia-Names of God.
If the explanation of the form above given be the true one, the original pronunciation must have been Yahweh ((יהוה) or Yahaweh (יהוה). From this the contracted form Jah or Yah (יה ) is most readily explained, and also the forms Jeho or Yeho (יהו ), and Jo or Yo (יו contracted from יהו , which the word assumes in combination in the first part of compound proper names, and Yahu or Yah (יהו ) in the second part of such names.
I don't know where you get your bogus information; but synagogue appears 23 times in Acts; and for some reason you seem to think that the Ecclesia is a building.
Wrong as usual I do not think the church is a building. The church meets in buildings.
I should have been more specific. I meant Romans through Revelation. Of course, synagogues are mentioned a number of times in Acts. Paul, who OBTW was a Jew, visited synagogues in every city he visited.
Between Romans and Revelation synagogue is mentioned only 2 times both in Revelation. Church is mentioned 92 times.
Why aren't all the Christians in Rome, Corinth, Galatia, Ephesus, Colossae, Thessalonica etc. being told to go to synagogues? Why didn't Paul tell Philemon, Timothy and Titus they had to go to synagogues? Why didn't Peter, James, John and Jude say anything about Christians having to go to synagogues, in their epistles?
The two times synagogue is mentioned in Rev. it refers to the synagogue of Satan.
I want to know where are all those Christians hurrying to synagogues on the Sabbath?
Why aren't there any letters written to synagogues?
 
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
64,559
10,685
US
✟1,560,118.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
I should have been more specific. I meant Romans through Revelation.

More specific? that has nothing to do with Acts. Next time maybe you should say what you mean.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,911
Georgia
✟1,094,317.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Acts 13 GENTILES ask that the gospel be presented to them "The NEXT Sabbath"
Acts 17:1-5 - Jews AND gentiles getting converted in the synagogues.
Acts 17:11-13 - Jews AND gentiles getting converted
Acts 18:4-11 Jews AND gentiles getting converted in the synagogues and returning for more gospel preaching "every Sabbath" Acts 18:4

You should have read the rest of my post.
Just because some gentiles were in some synagogues does not mean all gentiles were permitted in all synagogues.

help me out here - did you show even ONE case where gentiles were not "allowed in synagogues" because they were "gentiles"??

Did you suppose that they object to Paul because they claimed that "Paul is a gentile"?? -- even though they all know Paul is not only a Jew - but a Pharisee?

Acts 23
6 But perceiving that one group were Sadducees and the other Pharisees, Paul began crying out in the Council, “Brethren, I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees; I am on trial for the hope and resurrection of the dead!” 7 As he said this, there occurred a dissension between the Pharisees and Sadducees, and the assembly was divided. 8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, nor an angel, nor a spirit, but the Pharisees acknowledge them all. 9 And there occurred a great uproar; and some of the scribes of the Pharisaic party stood up and began to argue heatedly, saying, “We find nothing wrong with this man; suppose a spirit or an angel has spoken to him?”
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Scott Husted

Well-Known Member
Apr 8, 2020
860
376
65
Virginia Beach
✟64,500.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Acts 10
CLV(i) 9 Now, on the morrow, as they are journeying and drawing near the city, Peter went up on the housetop to pray about the sixth hour of the day." 10 Now he became ravenous and wanted to taste food. Now, while they are preparing it, an ecstasy came on him,

Looks like Peter's buddies were preparing a nice, Torah observant, healthy meal.

11 and he is beholding heaven open and a certain utensil descending, as a large sheet, with four edges, being let down on the earth, 12 in which belonged all the quadrupeds and reptiles of the earth and the flying creatures of heaven. 13 And a voice came to him, "Rise, Peter! Sacrifice and eat!" 14 Yet Peter said, "Far be it from me, Lord, for I never ate anything contaminating and unclean!"

Peter says NO!

15 And again, a second time, a voice came to him, "What God cleanses, do not you count contaminating!"

Is YHWH going against his own word here? Should we trust voices that tell us to break YHWH's law? Peter isn't dining.

16 Now this occurred thrice,

Still not dining.

and straightway the utensil was taken up into heaven."

There goes the picnic blanket. No treyf for Peter.


17 Now, as Peter was bewildered in himself as to what the vision which he perceived should be, lo!

Bewildered you say? Why not go breaking YHWH's commandments every time a voice pops into your head, instead of taking the time to process it?


the men who have been dispatched by Cornelius, asking the way through to the house of Simon, stand by at the portal." 18 And, shouting, they inquired to ascertain if Simon, surnamed Peter, is lodging in this place." 19 Now, as Peter is engrossed, concerned with the vision, the spirit said to him, "Lo! three men are seeking you!"

Oh lookey here! Three men show up right after Peter rejects the unclean three times! Are the bringing him delivery from the Hungry Heathen? I hear their Heathen Fried Ham Hocks are to die for.


20 But, rising, descend and go with them, nothing doubting, for I have commissioned them."

Rats! Nothing doing. Peter still hasn't eaten. A little rat jerky for the road would have been nice until they get to the Heathen banquet. I wonder if it will be a pig roast.


21 Now Peter, descending to the men, said, "Lo! I am he whom you are seeking. What is the cause for which you are present? 22 Now they say, "Cornelius, a centurion, a man just (Law abiding) and God-fearing, (obedient) besides being attested by the whole nation of the Jews, is apprized by a holy (dedicated) messenger to send after you to come into his house, and to hear declarations from you."

I wonder if there will be any food there. Still no mention of where YHWH forces Peter to eat treyf.

23 Calling them in, then, he lodges them. Now on the morrow, on rising,

Still no food? Peter was ravenous the day before! What could be more important than a PorkFat McMuffin right now?

he came away together with them, and some of the brethren from Joppa came with him." 24 Now on the morrow he entered into Caesarea. Now Cornelius was hoping for them, calling together his relatives and intimate friends."

Traveling; and still no treyf!?

25 Now as Peter came to enter, Cornelius, meeting with him, falling at his feet, worships." 26 Yet Peter raises him, saying, "Rise! I myself also am a man." 27 And, conversing with him, he entered, and is finding many come together." 28 Besides, he averred to them, "You are versed in the fact how illicit it is for a man who is a Jew to join or come to another tribe, and God shows me not to say that any man is contaminating or unclean."

Oh! So YHWH was talking about men, not food. There is no such law in the Torah. That law comes from the Talmud. Yahshua rebuked placing the Talmud over the Torah.

Maybe there's still hope. Maybe YHWH is calling Peter to eat the Heathens. I hear they taste just like pork. By now Peter must be very hungry.

29 Wherefore, without gainsaying, also, being sent after, I came. I am inquiring to ascertain, then, on what account you send after me." 30 And Cornelius averred, "Four days ago unto this hour was I fasting, and at the ninth, praying in my house, and lo! a man stood before me in splendid attire, 31 and is averring, 'Cornelius, your prayer is hearkened to, and your alms are brought to remembrance in God's sight." 32 Send, then, into Joppa, and call for Simon, who is surnamed Peter. He is lodging in the house of Simon, a tanner, beside the sea.'" 33 Forthwith, then I send to you. Besides you do ideally in coming along. Now, then, we are all present in God's sight to hear all that you have been bidden by the Lord." 34 Now Peter, opening his mouth, said, "Of a truth I am grasping that God is not partial, 35 but in every nation he who is fearing Him and acting righteously is acceptable to Him. 36 Of the word He dispatches to the sons of Israel, bringing the evangel of peace through Jesus Christ (He is Lord of all), 37 you are aware, the declaration coming to be down the whole of Judea, beginning from Galilee after the baptism which John heralds:" 38 Jesus from Nazareth, as God anoints Him with holy spirit and power, Who passed through as a benefactor and healer of all those who are tyrannized over by the Adversary, for God was with Him." 39 And we are witnesses of all that He does, both in the country of the Jews and in Jerusalem; Whom they assassinate also, hanging Him on a pole." 40 This One God rouses the third day, and gives Him to become disclosed, 41 not to the entire people, but to witnesses who have been selected before by God, to us who ate and drank together with Him after His rising from among the dead." 42 And He charges us to herald to the people and to certify that this One is He Who is specified by God to be Judge of the living and the dead. 43 To this One are all the prophets testifying: Everyone who is believing in Him is to obtain the pardon of sins through His name." 44 While Peter is still speaking these declarations, the holy spirit falls on all those hearing the word." 45 And amazed were the believers of the Circumcision, whoever come together with Peter, seeing that on the nations also the gratuity of the holy spirit has been poured out." 46 For they heard them speaking in languages and magnifying God. 47 Then Peter answered, "There can not be anyone to forbid water, so that these are not to be baptized, who obtained the holy spirit even as we." 48 Now he bids them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they ask him to stay some days.

Nope, no heathen banquet in any way shape or form. This was all about bringing the Pagans out of Paganism, and into Israel. It was not about taking Israel out of YHWH's Torah, and bringing Israel into Paganism.

This shows me again that the law is spiritual, in a relational way ... like a lamb without spot ...

The real question is, what measurement by our soul do we put on the words ... call not what I have cleansed unclean ... a similar thing can be seen in Jesus' words to the samaritan woman.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,911
Georgia
✟1,094,317.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
This shows me again that the law is spiritual, in a relational way ... like a lamb without spot ...

The real question is, what measurement by our soul do we put on the words ... call not what I have cleansed unclean ... a similar thing can be seen in Jesus' words to the samaritan woman.

Romans 7
7 What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? May it never be! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.” 8 But sin, taking opportunity through the commandment, produced in me coveting of every kind; for apart from the Law sin is dead. 9 I was once alive apart from the Law; but when the commandment came, sin became alive and I died; 10 and this commandment, which was to result in life, proved to result in death for me; 11 for sin, taking an opportunity through the commandment, deceived me and through it killed me. 12 So then, the Law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.

13 Therefore did that which is good become a cause of death for me? May it never be! Rather it was sin, in order that it might be shown to be sin by effecting my death through that which is good, so that through the commandment sin would become utterly sinful.

The Conflict of Two Natures
14 For we know that the Law is spiritual, but I am of flesh, sold into bondage to sin. 15 For what I am doing, I do not understand; for I am not practicing what I would like to do, but I am doing the very thing I hate. 16 But if I do the very thing I do not want to do, I agree with the Law, confessing that the Law is good. 17 So now, no longer am I the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me. 18 For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh; for the willing is present in me, but the doing of the good is not. 19 For the good that I want, I do not do, but I practice the very evil that I do not want. 20 But if I am doing the very thing I do not want, I am no longer the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me.
 
Upvote 0

dqhall

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2015
7,547
4,172
Florida
Visit site
✟811,723.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
help me out here - did you show even ONE case where gentiles were not "allowed in synagogues" because they were "gentiles"??

Did you suppose that they object to Paul because they claimed that "Paul is a gentile"?? -- even though they all know Paul is not only a Jew - but a Pharisee?

Acts 23
6 But perceiving that one group were Sadducees and the other Pharisees, Paul began crying out in the Council, “Brethren, I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees; I am on trial for the hope and resurrection of the dead!” 7 As he said this, there occurred a dissension between the Pharisees and Sadducees, and the assembly was divided. 8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, nor an angel, nor a spirit, but the Pharisees acknowledge them all. 9 And there occurred a great uproar; and some of the scribes of the Pharisaic party stood up and began to argue heatedly, saying, “We find nothing wrong with this man; suppose a spirit or an angel has spoken to him?”
If a Jew went into a Gentile’s home on the day before Passover, he might be deemed ritually unclean for having touched things in the house of those who know nothing about the law of what is clean. This would have disqualified him from eating the Passover meal, as described in the Talmud. He would have been required to perform the Passover ritual at a later date. Jewish able bodied males were required to attend the Passover in Jerusalem, unless they lived too far away.

It is unlikely devout Jews would have wanted unclean Gentiles in theif synagogue. They were excluded from the temple in Jerusalem under threat of the death penalty. Someone spread a rumor that Paul had taken an uncircumcised Gentile into the temple in Jerusalem. The crowd wanted to kill him.

Paul took Timothy with him as a teaching assistant. Timothy was uncircumcised. Paul circumcised him as Paul was yet reaching among the Jews and they could not have admitted a Gentile.

I was invited to a Sabbath meal in rabbi’s home as part of Jewish-Christian study group. Not all Jewish groups are open to outsiders.
 
Upvote 0

Scott Husted

Well-Known Member
Apr 8, 2020
860
376
65
Virginia Beach
✟64,500.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Romans 7
7 What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? May it never be! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.” 8 But sin, taking opportunity through the commandment, produced in me coveting of every kind; for apart from the Law sin is dead. 9 I was once alive apart from the Law; but when the commandment came, sin became alive and I died; 10 and this commandment, which was to result in life, proved to result in death for me; 11 for sin, taking an opportunity through the commandment, deceived me and through it killed me. 12 So then, the Law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.

13 Therefore did that which is good become a cause of death for me? May it never be! Rather it was sin, in order that it might be shown to be sin by effecting my death through that which is good, so that through the commandment sin would become utterly sinful.

The Conflict of Two Natures
14 For we know that the Law is spiritual, but I am of flesh, sold into bondage to sin. 15 For what I am doing, I do not understand; for I am not practicing what I would like to do, but I am doing the very thing I hate. 16 But if I do the very thing I do not want to do, I agree with the Law, confessing that the Law is good. 17 So now, no longer am I the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me. 18 For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh; for the willing is present in me, but the doing of the good is not. 19 For the good that I want, I do not do, but I practice the very evil that I do not want. 20 But if I am doing the very thing I do not want, I am no longer the one doing it, but sin which dwells in me.

A pattern that begins in the first garden with two fruits from one tree ...
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
More specific? that has nothing to do with Acts. Next time maybe you should say what you mean.
The NT does not begin and end in Acts. I assume from the snarky reply you cannot address what I said.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,253
6,244
Montreal, Quebec
✟303,642.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Romans 7
7 What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? May it never be! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.” 8 But sin, taking opportunity through the commandment, produced in me coveting of every kind; for apart from the Law sin is dead. 9 I was once alive apart from the Law; but when the commandment came, sin became alive and I died; 10 and this commandment, which was to result in life, proved to result in death for me; 11 for sin, taking an opportunity through the commandment, deceived me and through it killed me. 12 So then, the Law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.
Just so there is no confusion, Paul can believe both the following:

1. The Law is good and holy;
2. The Law is shortly coming to an end.

These statements can both be true and Paul believes them both.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: baryogenesis
Upvote 0

baryogenesis

Active Member
Site Supporter
Sep 11, 2010
152
33
cancelled
✟67,530.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Colossians 2:

9 For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, 10 and in Christ you have been brought to fullness. He is the head over every power and authority. 11 In him you were also circumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hands. Your whole self ruled by the flesh was put off when you were circumcised by Christ, 12 having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.

13 When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins, 14 having canceled the charge of our legal indebtedness, which stood against us and condemned us; he has taken it away, nailing it to the cross. 15 And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.

16 Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. 17 These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ. 18 Do not let anyone who delights in false humility and the worship of angels disqualify you. Such a person also goes into great detail about what they have seen; they are puffed up with idle notions by their unspiritual mind. 19 They have lost connection with the head, from whom the whole body, supported and held together by its ligaments and sinews, grows as God causes it to grow.

20 Since you died with Christ to the elemental spiritual forces of this world, why, as though you still belonged to the world, do you submit to its rules: 21 “Do not handle! Do not taste! Do not touch!”? 22 These rules, which have to do with things that are all destined to perish with use, are based on merely human commands and teachings. 23 Such regulations indeed have an appearance of wisdom, with their self-imposed worship, their false humility and their harsh treatment of the body, but they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,911
Georgia
✟1,094,317.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Just so there is no confusion, Paul can believe both the following:

1. The Law is good and holy;
2. The Law is shortly coming to an end.

These statements can both be true and Paul believes them both.

If paul was preaching that the commandments were about to end -- then claiming that "Honor your father and mother" is the first commandment with a promise in that still-valid-unit of Ten was the wrong road to be on in Eph 6:2.

How much worse then his statement "what matters is keeping the Commandments of God" in 1 Cor 7:19??

And of course "do we then make void the LAW of God by our faith? God forbid! In fact we establish the Law" Rom 3:31

With John writing at the end that "the saints KEEP the Commandments of God AND their faith in Jesus" Rev 14:12

Did Paul say anything along the lines "Don't worry about that command to honor parents after I die -- because by then it will have been deleted"?? Is there any language at all like that in what he wrote??
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What does this have to do with gentiles?
I have found it helpful to actually read a post before trying to respond. And even if it doesn't mention gentiles if the Jews constantly persecuted the apostles, who were Jews, for teaching about Jesus do you think they would allow uncircumcised gentile Christians in their synagogues?
How many times did Paul write to any synagogues? How many times did Paul write to churches? If Christians were meeting regularly with Jews why would Paul write to the church in Rome , the church in Corinth and not synagogues?
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It doesn't. Now let's stay on topic.
Acts of the apostles 14:5 Acts of the apostles 21:28 Since you replied to my post and said nothing to the person who started this particular part of the discussion please get off my case and out of my face.
Seems to me that whenever someone starts getting the better of the discussion you say it is off topic.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,911
Georgia
✟1,094,317.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I have found it helpful to actually read a post before trying to respond. And even if it doesn't mention gentiles if the Jews constantly persecuted the apostles, who were Jews, for teaching about Jesus do you think they would allow uncircumcised gentile ...

I think you just admitted you have no text at all for that point other than what you can imagine they might do... by contrast we have "actual Bible" showing us that they had gentiles in their synagogue - and you have "not one text" saying that the Jews kicked gentiles out of the synagogue "because they were gentiles".

Were we just not supposed to notice??
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,911
Georgia
✟1,094,317.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
It is unlikely devout Jews would have wanted unclean Gentiles in theif synagogue. They were excluded from the temple in Jerusalem .

True of the temple - but as the NT shows in chapter 13, and chapter 17 and chapter 18 -- it was most certainly NOT true of the synagogues. Which is why I keep bringing up the point that we are not "left to imagine" if gentiles were in the synagogues -- we actually SEE it in the book of acts.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,145
EST
✟1,123,523.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
True of the temple - but as the NT shows in chapter 13, and chapter 17 and chapter 18 -- it was most certainly NOT true of the synagogues. Which is why I keep bringing up the point that we are not "left to imagine" if gentiles were in the synagogues -- we actually SEE it in the book of acts.
Nonsense! Uncircumcised gentiles would not have been allowed in the synagogues. Any gentiles mentioned would have to be Jewish NOT Christian proselytes.
Acts of the apostles 10:28 He said to them: "You are well aware that it is against our law for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. But God has shown me that I should not call anyone impure or unclean.
Acts of the apostles 11:2-3
2 So when Peter went up to Jerusalem, the circumcised believers criticized him
3 and said, "You went into the house of uncircumcised men and ate with them."
John 4:9 The Samaritan woman said to him, "You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?" (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.)
John 18:28 Then the Jewish leaders took Jesus from Caiaphas to the palace of the Roman governor. By now it was early morning, and to avoid ceremonial uncleanness they did not enter the palace, because they wanted to be able to eat the Passover.
Jewish historical sources document that.
Jewish Encyclopia-Gentiles
Gentiles May Not Be Taught the Torah.
Inasmuch as the Jews had their own distinct jurisdiction, it would have been unwise to reveal their laws to the Gentiles, for such knowledge might have operated against the Jews in their opponents' courts. Hence the Talmud prohibited the teaching to a Gentile of the Torah, "the inheritance of the congregation of Jacob" (Deut. xxxiii. 4). R. Johanan says of one so teaching: [Torah] "Such a person deserves death" (an idiom used to express indignation). "It is like placing an obstacle before the blind" (Sanh. 59a; Ḥag. 13a). …
Resh Lakish (d. 278) said, "A Gentile observing the Sabbath deserves death" (Sanh. 58b). This refers to a Gentile who accepted the seven laws of the Noachidæ, inasmuch as "the Sabbath is a sign between God and Israel alone," ... Rabbina, who lived about 150 years after the Christians had changed the day of rest to Sunday, could not quite understand the principle underlying Resh Lakish's law, and, commenting upon it, added: "not even on Mondays [is the Gentile allowed to rest]"; intimating that the mandate given to the Noachidæ that "day and night shall not cease" ((Heb.)Lo yshabti = "have no rest ") should be taken in a literal sense (Gen. viii. 22)—probably to discourage general idleness
"The Torah outlawed the issue of a Gentile as that of a beast" (Miḳ. viii. 4, referring to Ezek. l.c.)
Johanan bar Nappaḥa … the Torah was given as a heritage to Israel, a non-Israelite deserves death if he studies it [Torah](Sanh. 59a).
Gamaliel also expresses himself to the same effect, adding that the Gentiles, by their impure motive, incur the penalty of Gehenna. Eleazar of Modi'im sides with him, saying that "the Gentiles practice benevolence merely to taunt Israel."
Eliezer b. Hyrcanus is …, the mind of every non-Jew is always intent upon idolatry (Giṭ. 45b). The cattle of a heathen is unfit for sacrifices ('Ab. Zarah 23b). Explaining Prov. xiv. 34, he maintains that the non-Jews only practise charity in order to make for themselves a name (B. B. 10b; Pesiḳ. 12b; Gamaliel is credited with the same opinion in B. B. 10b).
Joshua b. Hananiah, … as a rule Gentiles cling to vain things and are rejected (Prov. xxviii. 19; Gen. R. lxxxii.).
Eleazar of Modi'im, in reference to Micah iv. 5, explains that Israel, though guilty of the same sins as the Gentiles, will not enter hell, while the Gentiles will [enter hell] (Cant. R. ii. 1). .. On the whole, he is very bitter in his condemnations of the heathen. "They profit by their deeds of love and benevolence to slander Israel" (referring to Jer. xl. 3;B. B. 10a).
Among Akiba's disciples Tarphon is noted for his antipathy to the Judæo-Christians, whose books he would burn without regard for the name of God occurring therein, preferring the temple of idolaters to them (Shab. 116a).
Simon ben Yoḥai is preeminently the anti-Gentile teacher. In a collection of three sayings of his, beginning with the keyword (Heb.) Shob (Yer. Ḳid. 66c; Massek. Soferim xv. 10; Mek., Beshal-laḥ, 27a; Tan., Wayera, ed. Buber, 20), is found the expression, often quoted by anti-Semites, "Ṭob shebe-goyyim harog" (="The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed").
On the basis of Hab. iii. 6, Simon b. Yohai argued that, of all the nations, Israel alone was worthy to receive the Law (Lev. R. xiii.). The Gentiles, according to him, would not observe the seven laws given to the Noachidae (Tosef., Soṭah, viii. 7; Soṭah 35b), though the Law was written on the altar (Deut. xxvi. 8) in the seventy languages. Hence, while Israel is like the patient ass, the Gentiles resemble the easy-going, selfish dog (Lev. R. xiii.; Sifre, Deut., Wezot ha-Berakah, 343).
Judah ben 'Illai recommends the daily recital of the benediction. "Blessed be Thou . . . who hast not made me a goi[gentile]" (Tosef., Ber. vii. 18: Men. 43b, sometimes ascribed to Meir; see Weiss, "Dor," ii. 137). Judah is confident that the heathen (Gentiles) will ultimately come to shame (Isa. lxvi. 5; B. M. 33b).The Gentiles took copies of the Torah, and yet did not accept it (Soṭah 35b).
Eliezer, the son of Jose the Galilean, calls the Gentiles poor "goyyim dawim," because they would not accept the Torah (Mek., Yitro. 62a), referring to Hab. iii. 6 and Ps. cxlvii. 20
Josiah holds that
every idolatrous heathen is an enemy of Israel (Mek., Mishpaṭim, 99a).
Jonathan insists that eclipses are of bad augury for Gentiles only, according to
Jer. x. 2 (Mek., Bo, 19b).
Simon ben Jose likens Israel to a stone, and the Gentiles to a potsherd (
Isa. xxx. 14), applying the proverb: "If the stone falls on the pot, wo to the pot; if the pot falls on the stone, wo to the pot." This he offered as a consolation to persecuted Israel (Esther R. iii. 6).
Hezekiah b. Hiyya deduces from
II Kings xx. 18 that he who shows hospitality to a heathen brings the penalty of exile upon his own children (Sanh. 104a).
Johanan bar Nappaḥa … lays stress on the fact that God offered the Law to all nations, who refused to accept it ('Ab. Zarah 2b); therefore while the virus of lust that the serpent injected into Eve was neutralized in Israel, the "nations of the world" still have it in their blood (Shab. 145b; Yeb. 103b; 'Ab. Zarah 22b)….
the Torah was given as a heritage to Israel, a non-Israelite deserves death if he studies it (Sanh. 59a).
Assi is the author of the injunction not to instruct the Gentile in the Torah (Ḥag. 13a).
Tanhuma …
likens the nations to wolves and Israel to a lamb (Pesiḳ. R. ix. [ed. Friedmann, p.32a]).
The seven nations in the Holy Land were to be exterminated for fear they might teach the Israelite conquerors idolatry and immoral practices (
Deut. vii. 1-6, xviii. 9-14, xx. 16-18);
The Gentiles were so strongly suspected of unnatural crimes that it was necessary to prohibit the stabling of a cow in their stalls ('Ab. Zarah ii. 1).
GENTILE - JewishEncyclopedia.com

 
Upvote 0