• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Perverted homosexual arguments

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Do you think Christians are bound by the Law?
Why do you put me under the law when you say I sin if I commit a same-sex act w/another human being that I love and am committed to?
 
Upvote 0

Gusoceros

Head Rhino
Mar 1, 2004
465
25
✟16,069.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
When people say "the law"

I think I'd like to see a complete list of everything that is in the law that is applicable under the new covenant, with explanations for which bits are in, and which bits are out

The old law applies where it comes to the Benefits of its fulfillment. The NT applies to Christians in 2 laws, that sum up the old law- love your God, love your neighbor.

G
 
Upvote 0

Gusoceros

Head Rhino
Mar 1, 2004
465
25
✟16,069.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why do you put me under the law when you say I sin if I commit a same-sex act w/another human being that I love and am committed to?

I dont put you under the law. The Bible is clear on the same sex act- in both testaments.

G
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I dont put you under the law. The Bible is clear on the same sex act- in both testaments.

G
The new testament...where? The only thing addressed in Romans 1 is same sex lust (not attraction or a committed relationship) and 1 Cor 6:9 is the silliest argument yet (See 1 Timothy 1:10 for proof of same word).

Any other NT verses for me?
 
Upvote 0

Full_Moon

Newbie
Mar 30, 2004
352
29
44
Calgary
✟783.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

I believe it happened that I brought up the Law and someone said Leviticus. Leviticus does make an undeniable statement against sodomy. (or for people who don't understand what sodomy means, against one man lying with another as he lies with a woman)

The reason I choose this topic and not diet is that sexual sin is far more damaging than a poor diet.

I posted the decree of the Jerusalem council not far back. To make it easier for gentiles, idolatry, eating meat sacrificed to idols and sexual immorality were given as things to focus on abstaining from.

Lets live better lives one step and a time! Learn to crawl before walking etc etc..

But the main reason for this topic is the greatly absurd assault on God's Law and Grace that is being posed by proponents of homosexual deeds. Churches are not being divided over shellfish or vanity, gluttony or over-hunting. I am here to examine what appears to be arguments of dark minds.

So again, where is the reasonable argument for the biblical justification of homosexual acts? Someone give one single reasonable account for God blessing same-sex marriage.
I've heard better arguments from ten year olds! Teach me the ways of the serpent!
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Not a good example of anything. Do you ever read posts or do you just skip/skim posts.

HOMOSEXUALITY IN A LOVING, MONOGAMOUS RELATIONSHIP WAS NOT RECOGNIZED TILL THE 19TH CENTURY. GOOGLE IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME.

EVERYONE TAKES HISTORICAL CONTEXT INTO ACCOUNT FOR SLAVERY AND CONDONING OF POLYGAMY IN EXODUS
 
Upvote 0

Full_Moon

Newbie
Mar 30, 2004
352
29
44
Calgary
✟783.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married



I like you.

Don't think that I am concerned with boys humping boys and girl on girl action!

To answer the question of your next post, ALL OF THE LAW IS GOOD AND VALID!

Seriously, there are a ton of bible quotes saying that exact same thing all through this thread. Ones by Jesus, Paul, Moses, God, other prophets (well, I don't know if any of those were quoted from other prophets).

The Law is simply what is right and wrong.

As it is written, so we should study and learn, not critisize what we don't understand. Nor should we pick and choose which parts we like and don't like. The Law is no minor topic in both OT and NT scripture and it is always upheld.

Am I responding to what you mean?
 
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
God said not to have same sex relations- it is a sin.
No he didn't... and anyway, you said the whole of the old law that we still are subject to can be condensed to "love your God, love your neighbor. " same sex relationships arent mentioned
 
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Am I responding to what you mean?
Not really... my original question stands... clearly, there are bits of the law that you don't follow. So why do you think you are entitled to criticise others for not following the law when you don't either?
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
To love God is to obey God. God said not to have same sex relations- it is a sin.

G
God said that, or did your intepretation of the current commandment say that...or was it someone else that said that?
 
Upvote 0

Full_Moon

Newbie
Mar 30, 2004
352
29
44
Calgary
✟783.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
 
Upvote 0

Full_Moon

Newbie
Mar 30, 2004
352
29
44
Calgary
✟783.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
AS I SAID, the scholars seem to agree that this verse in Leviticus falls under the purity code violations that we do not follow anymore. The Mosaic law is the only thing to be concerned with.
 
Upvote 0

Full_Moon

Newbie
Mar 30, 2004
352
29
44
Calgary
✟783.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
AS I SAID, the scholars seem to agree that this verse in Leviticus falls under the purity code violations that we do not follow anymore. The Mosaic law is the only thing to be concerned with.

As you SAID eh...

Well, as you didn't SAY , what the Mosaic law regarding sexual morality IS. It obviously exists since Jesus, Paul, the Jerusalem council and others referred to it. Find it for me please.

I'd also ask you to think about what these "scholars" have said regarding 'that' verse in leviticus. For it is in the section which covers sexual morality laws (though we disagree on that). Lets get personal, I know what it is like to be blind to certain aspects of sexual morality. Yet, if you are like me, you are not blind to all aspects of sexual morality. For instance, it is my guess that you would consider it a perversion to have sexual relations with your mom or your dog. eh? I'd like you to answer.

So again I ask, think about this claim that the section which contains 'that verse' is merely about 'purity code' (I honestly don't know what that means, though I take it to mean that we need not worry about purity codes). Think about the entire section and then think about what cost you are willing to bear to uphold your stance on homosexual acts. The reason I say this is that to deny that section of law as merely 'purity codes' has far-reaching consequences.

Cheers man. Say hello to your boyfriend (no ill intended)
 
Upvote 0

Full_Moon

Newbie
Mar 30, 2004
352
29
44
Calgary
✟783.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I want peoples input. Read this section and pray to God (seriously). Then tell me if you see it as mere purity codes that we can disregard or as moral codes that we must regard.


Leviticus 18
Unlawful Sexual Relations (or purity codes?)
 
Upvote 0

Full_Moon

Newbie
Mar 30, 2004
352
29
44
Calgary
✟783.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Now let us examine if these punishments for sin pertain to purity codes or moral codes.

Again, I'm looking for input. Do these punishments relate to purity codes are moral codes?

 
Upvote 0

Full_Moon

Newbie
Mar 30, 2004
352
29
44
Calgary
✟783.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Now, If I'm understanding Purity Codes correctly, I understand this section to cover some purity codes. Not to say that we should disregard it, but that it is likely too great a burden to bear for most of us. I believe it still wise to study for understanding the nature of purity.

Of course I'm open to input on this also, but mostly wanted to give a comparasin.

 
Upvote 0