The latest abomination out of Planned Parenthood:
Group noted for deceptive edited videos releases another edited video. Film at 11.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The latest abomination out of Planned Parenthood:
Was none. The South seceded over the North's attempts to make it a crime.
History's not going to repeat itself, of course -- the pro-birth lobby won't have the same level of success as the North did.
Personal freedom -- including the freedom to do things other people don't like -- allows you to exist in this country.
So no problem with slavery then?
Did I say that?
Concerning two earlier releases:
Linkie
A transcription service was hired to transcribe the videos, without being told that Planned Parenthood was the client, to compare with transcripts publicized by the anti-abortion group. That comparison, the analysis said, showed “substantive omissions” from the group’s version. Mr. Simpson was assisted in the analysis by several others including a video forensics expert, Grant Fredericks, and a television producer, Scott Goldie.
According to the investigation, the reviewers could not determine “the extent to which C.M.P.s undisclosed edits and cuts distort the meaning of the encounters the videos purport to document.”
But, it said, “the manipulation of the videos does mean they have no evidentiary value in a legal context and cannot be relied upon for any official inquiries” unless C.M.P. provides investigators with its original material, and that material is independently authenticated as unaltered.
Did I say you did? It was a question. I won't go into detail about what that is. But since you seem to have no problem with abortion (a woman's choice to simply end development of a lifeless blob of fetal tissue, you know) and then the treatment of dead babies as if they were simply merchandise to be traded on the open market,
it sounded like you had no problem with slavery either, being that it was legal at the time and all. As if no law against something makes it a-ok.
What dead babies? Lifeless blob of fetal tissue, you know.
<<< Pro-choice justification![]()
One would think that the pro-birth crowd would have outlawed abortion based solely on the emotional impact.
Any reason that hasn't worked after over 40 years?
How about morals? Otherwise, we are done as a society.
So go ahead and legislate some morals... finally succeed after four decades of failure.
Four decades of failure..
What about our 180 decades of success, when the moral argument reigned supreme?
You call it 'emotional' to defend what is a complete desensitization for the human fetus. Why not the same with newborns, who could also be met with a painless death? Don't let your 'emotions' get in the way, now, the sin is just plainer to see.
What dead babies? Lifeless blob of fetal tissue, you know.