True Scotsman
Objectivist
It might be a computer. And relying on the results of the experiment would presuppose that we could accurately read the dials and read outs of the instrument doing the measuring without affecting them.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It might be a computer. And relying on the results of the experiment would presuppose that we could accurately read the dials and read outs of the instrument doing the measuring without affecting them.Hopefully, the operator is.
(1) One must first assume that the one who said it is God.
(2) Also truth is an attribute of identification.
(3) It is conceptual in nature.
(4) If you want to say that God is a concept I don't have a problem with that except to say that it would only be a concept in way that a writer comes up with a concept for a character.
(5) A true concept is a mental integration of two or more concretes and God is supposed to be unique.
Metaphysical woo-woo.[No Demon'(stration) Baggage Beyond This Point]
Evidences from this world are just as unacceptable in God's spiritual realm, as spiritual evidences are in the natural/scientific realm. Thus, it is impossible to relate or relay, in such terms. Demanding such terms is futile. The spiritual parties have allowed for and do concede to the natural/scientific evidence (except when it is known to be in error according to the greater authority of Him who create the natural/scientific realm, in which case it would not serve anyone to let it go, even to appease). The natural/scientific parties have yet to concede that there is anything beyond their realm, even though many have admitted that it is possible. Natural and supernatural. What a concept. It's not that difficult.
Of course, in fact, I have said that it is not I who can reveal it to you.
So, if you are tracking so far: There are two distinct realities, where the supernatural supersedes the natural, the supernatural being the only true reality, while the natural reality is [even scientifically] an illusion (a closed circuit world, created for demon'stration of the supernatural reality). The handwriting is not only on the wall, it is blatant.
In order to know of the greater spiritual reality, one must ask...not in unbelief, but in sincerity. Seek and ye shall find.
It might be a computer. And relying on the results of the experiment would presuppose that we could accurately read the dials and read outs of the instrument doing the measuring without affecting them.
If Jesus ever wrote anything, it didn't survive, so we have no idea of anything Jesus was according to.Truth Is Jesus, according to Jesus.
The problem with "non-contradictory, objective identification of the facts of reality" is that quantum mechanics has demonstrated that objective reality changes when you observe it.
If Jesus ever wrote anything, it didn't survive, so we have no idea of anything Jesus was according to.
nOW...don't be tempted to look at things through worldly glasses and revert back to worldly terms. That will just mess you up. If you just stay on the shore and woo-woo, you may as well be the kid who was told not to get wet ... Jump in!Metaphysical woo-woo.
The only person messed up here is the one who believes in metaphysical woo-woo. Good on ya'.nOW...don't be tempted to look at things through worldly glasses and revert back to worldly terms. That will just mess you up. If you just stay on the shore and woo-woo, you may as well be the kid who was told not to get wet ... Jump in!
Okay...the Earth is flat...then.The only person messed up here is the one who believes in metaphysical woo-woo. Good on ya'.
Boy...am I ever messed than.The only person messed up here is the one who believes in metaphysical woo-woo. Good on ya'.
Nothing survives that Jesus wrote.
Truth Is Jesus, according to Jesus.
The problem with "non-contradictory, objective identification of the facts of reality" is that quantum mechanics has demonstrated that objective reality changes when you observe it.
(2) That is a philosophical construct which may or may not have any connection to reality.
When did quantum mechanics demonstrate that?
Really? Then the same would apply to your statement. So in other words we can't know anything for sure except the Bible is true, is that it? Give me a break.
If Jesus ever wrote anything, it didn't survive, so we have no idea of anything Jesus was according to.
Demonstrate which, that Jesus is the Truth or that reality changes when observed?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?