• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Pentagon blocked Biden's intelligence transition team from meeting with agencies

friend of

A private in Gods army
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2016
5,925
4,213
provincial
✟986,850.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Yeah, he's only passing substantive legislation, strengthening our ties with many of our allies, forming the AUKUS alliance to counter China, and trying to govern rather than wring as much money out of the government as possible.
AUKUS was formed because Canada is run by a compromised leftwing nutjob. Not a good thing. Joe's not too savvy on the border either. If he were interested in countering China, he could at least start by addressing the fentanyl crisis, concocted by China, killing thousands every month. Strategic ambiguity over Taiwan is also a nonsense, nonstarter position. China already anticipates US aid to Taiwan. This administration would appear stronger if they would just commit to defending Taiwan militarily, publicly, like Joe has mentioned half a dozen times already (before being contradicted by WH spokesmen) which further goes to suggest he's nothing but a puppet.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
AUKUS was formed because Canada is run by a compromised leftwing nutjob.
What a fascinating claim. I had no idea Canada's elections had such power over American foreign policy.
 
Upvote 0

friend of

A private in Gods army
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2016
5,925
4,213
provincial
✟986,850.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
What a fascinating claim. I had no idea Canada's elections had such power over American foreign policy.
AUKUS wouldn't need to exist if Five Eyes could rely on Canada.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,446
16,026
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟451,803.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
AUKUS was formed because Canada is run by a compromised leftwing nutjob.
Funny stuff. I'm NOT fan of Trudeau but to call him "leftwing" requires one to be "American right"....maaaaybe Canadian right. But they would think Mulroney was leftwing too.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,446
16,026
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟451,803.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Please, viewership in CNN dropped like a rock, are you one of the diehards?
Like a rock eh?
This is another made up claim
He's by far the most inept person ever to hold the office. How anyone could support him now blows my mind.
No, he's not. Some minds are easily blown.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,446
16,026
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟451,803.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
AUKUS wouldn't need to exist if Five Eyes could rely on Canada.
This may be one of the most ridiculous things I've read about foreign policy on Canada on this website I've ever seen. And there have been some FANTASTIC doozies.

AUKUS exists to sell American subs to those countries. Australia reneged on a 90 billion dollar deal with France so the US got it.

That is SO cute that you think this deal has anything to do with meaningful peace and protection and isn't simply a cover to exponentailly grown America's military industrial complex.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,263
22,842
US
✟1,744,238.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This may be one of the most ridiculous things I've read about foreign policy on Canada on this website I've ever seen. And there have been some FANTASTIC doozies.

AUKUS exists to sell American subs to those countries. Australia reneged on a 90 billion dollar deal with France so the US got it.

That is SO cute that you think this deal has anything to do with meaningful peace and protection and isn't simply a cover to exponentailly grown America's military industrial complex.
AUKUS wouldn't need to exist if Five Eyes could rely on Canada.

"Five Eyes" still exists. Five Eyes is an intelligence cooperation program that's old as NATO. In my active duty days as an intel analyst, I never worked anywhere that a Canuk, a Brit, or an Aussie wasn't around. The "No foreign dissemination except CANUKUS" stamp got used a lot. As rambot said, AUKUS was created as a military equipment purchasing pact.

Funny point: When the US Air Force creates and revises their fighter tactics annually at Nellis AFB to revise the fighter tactics manual, CANUKUS is invited to participate. Makes sense, given that they are expected to fly with the US in combat, right? At the end of the Nellis meeting, all the parties depart with their copies of the new draft tactics manual.

But when the US Air Force fighter tactics manual is printed and distributed to the fighter squadrons, it's marked "SECRET--No foreign dissemination"--not even to CANUKUS.

And the CANUKUS parties, when they print the same manual, also mark theirs "SECRET--No Foreign Dissemination."

And this sticks: We can't show them our manual, they can't show us theirs, or to each other...but it's the exact same manual. Even the cover illustration is the same.

It used to be kind of a joke for us intel guys when we were working together in one room in the OPs area. I'd pull my copy of the manual out of my safe and flash the cover at my Aussie colleague saying, "I can't let you see this." He'd pull his copy out of his safe and flash it, saying, "And I can't let you see this either, mate!"

We were hosting one combined exercise of an Aussie squadron with several US squadrons in the Philippines back in the 80s. A 2nd LT intell officer from one US squadron realized, "Oh, no! The Australians are planning missions with us and flying with us! They'll see all our secret tactics!"

He came to us with that concern. We told him not to worry about it. Everyone understood the situation, it was okay, everything had been vetted for decades. Not a problem. In fact, I'd placed a CYA call to the Pentagon myself some time earlier, just to be sure. For some reason, it was a classification quirk that everyone knew about, but nobody in the DIA had ever gotten around to fixing it, and the fighter jocks didn't care.

But the 2nd LT's concern was apparently not allayed, because the next day our squadron commander came storming into our office demanding, "Who the <bleepity bleep bleep> is this Lieutenant Fuzz that called PACAF headquarters trying to get the exercise shut down?"

The lieutenant's commander sent him home.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,446
16,026
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟451,803.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
"Five Eyes" still exists. Five Eyes is an intelligence cooperation program that's old as NATO. In my active duty days as an intel analyst, I never worked anywhere that a Canuk, a Brit, or an Aussie wasn't around. The "No foreign dissemination except CANUKUS" stamp got used a lot. As rambot said, AUKUS was created as a military equipment purchasing pact.

Funny point: When the US Air Force creates and revises their fighter tactics annually at Nellis AFB to revise the fighter tactics manual, CANUKUS is invited to participate. Makes sense, given that they are expected to fly with the US in combat, right? At the end of the Nellis meeting, all the parties depart with their copies of the new draft tactics manual.

But when the US Air Force fighter tactics manual is printed and distributed to the fighter squadrons, it's marked "SECRET--No foreign dissemination"--not even to CANUKUS.

And the CANUKUS parties, when they print the same manual, also mark theirs "SECRET--No Foreign Dissemination."

And this sticks: We can't show them our manual, they can't show us theirs, or to each other...but it's the exact same manual. Even the cover illustration is the same.

It used to be kind of a joke for us intel guys when we were working together in one room in the OPs area. I'd pull my copy of the manual out of my safe and flash the cover at my Aussie colleague saying, "I can't let you see this." He'd pull his copy out of his safe and flash it, saying, "And I can't let you see this either, mate!"

We were hosting one combined exercise of an Aussie squadron with several US squadrons in the Philippines back in the 80s. A 2nd LT intell officer from one US squadron realized, "Oh, no! The Australians are planning missions with us and flying with us! They'll see all our secret tactics!"

He came to us with that concern. We told him not to worry about it. Everyone understood the situation, it was okay, everything had been vetted for decades. Not a problem. In fact, I'd placed a CYA call to the Pentagon myself some time earlier, just to be sure. For some reason, it was a classification quirk that everyone knew about, but nobody in the DIA had ever gotten around to fixing it, and the fighter jocks didn't care.

But the 2nd LT's concern was apparently not allayed, because the next day our squadron commander came storming into our office demanding, "Who the <bleepity bleep bleep> is this Lieutenant Fuzz that called PACAF headquarters trying to get the exercise shut down?"

The lieutenant's commander sent him home.
I've been fascinated by your other posts about your previous work in the past.
This is another one. Thanks!
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,446
16,026
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟451,803.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Thanks @RDKirk. But from what I can tell, Five Eyes can't rely on or trust Canada anymore at this point.
Canada has made it clear about it's capacities and where it focuses its work. It is a strong and (as far as I know) respected part of Five Eyes. RDKirk explained exactly how you would be incorrect.

But you STILL hold onto your opinion, despite it being misinformed. How do you benefit from that?
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,604
6,011
Minnesota
✟335,632.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0