Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Pennsylvania DA won't charge officer who shot jailed man, thinking gun was Taser
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dgiharris" data-source="post: 73860683" data-attributes="member: 322579"><p>What is so strange is that in every other profession, the law holds said profession to a higher standard.</p><p></p><p>Lets say for instance that I invite you to my house and I cook you a meal and I give you food poisoning. You decide to sue me and you will easily win the cost of any medical bills you incurred and that would more or less be the case. </p><p></p><p>however, instead of me being a normal person, lets say that I'm a trained chef that owns a restaurant and you suffer food poisoning at my restaurant. Now, that same lawsuit has teeth. Now, you would be awarded a lot more money because the law recognizes that I should have known better because I'm a professional...</p><p></p><p>Yet, law enforcement is never held to the same standard as other professions. It's so weird. I don't know what sort of group think allows for such a contrarian standard...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dgiharris, post: 73860683, member: 322579"] What is so strange is that in every other profession, the law holds said profession to a higher standard. Lets say for instance that I invite you to my house and I cook you a meal and I give you food poisoning. You decide to sue me and you will easily win the cost of any medical bills you incurred and that would more or less be the case. however, instead of me being a normal person, lets say that I'm a trained chef that owns a restaurant and you suffer food poisoning at my restaurant. Now, that same lawsuit has teeth. Now, you would be awarded a lot more money because the law recognizes that I should have known better because I'm a professional... Yet, law enforcement is never held to the same standard as other professions. It's so weird. I don't know what sort of group think allows for such a contrarian standard... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Pennsylvania DA won't charge officer who shot jailed man, thinking gun was Taser
Top
Bottom