Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
StevenL said:Once a man is no longer "blameless" and no longer has "a good testimony among those who are outside..", he is no longer qualified to be an overseer in the Body. 1 Tim. 3. These people who stink up the reputation of the Lord and His Assembly and then just keep on trying to get back into the "ministry" are not interested in the Word at all. They are interested in their "ministry." That's where their money is after all, and their ego strokes. But these guys who do this should just quit, repent of their sin, and then get a real job and just quietly live for God until they go home.
Not if the words of Paul are true words.Asaph said:You've got to be kidding about this right?
Asaph
What would we do without David's sin to justify our own? We always have Bathsheba to run back to, don't we?Svt4Him said:And again, why on earth would we want to focus on it? Did you hear about David? Killed a man. Can't believe how we thought he was a man after God's heart. I'll never listen to him again, glad I didn't listen to him before. He was a Charismatic I hear, sometimes he'd dance like a crazy man. And man oh man he did the unthinkable, slept with a married woman too. I sure am glad I'm not like him. Sure am glad I don't have a ministry like his.
StevenL said:Not if the words of Paul are true words.
Yes, overseers have a standard to meet. Paul didn't write all those qualifications so we could pick and choose which ones we wanted to use. But that's why we're in the mess we're in now. We've picked the few sentences we like and thrown out the rest. "Oh Paul couldn't have really meant that"...."why?"...."because I say so, that's why." "Paul just needed to add a few silly words so his letter wouldn't be too short. He knew nobody would really take him seriously, you know."Asaph said:Are these words of Paul true? Or are there conditions on the ability of Jesus?
Gal 6:1-5
6:1 Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness, considering yourself lest you also be tempted. 2 Bear one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ. 3 For if anyone thinks himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceives himself. 4 But let each one examine his own work, and then he will have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another. 5 For each one shall bear his own load.
NKJV
Then the words to Timothy were for a different class? Are pastors then a different race too? Subject to being different than the rest of us?
Asaph
Do you get that from my post? We talk about love, but love keeps no record of wrong. It seems to me that in Christian circles it's ok, because we're talking about their sin, and we don't want to tolerate sin now do we, even if someone repents of it.Jim M said:What would we do without David's sin to justify our own? We always have Bathsheba to run back to, don't we?
You are not using David's sin to justify sin in our "leaders" are you?
\o/
StevenL said:Your quoted verse is talking about restoring the sinning person to his place with God, NOT about putting someone back into a "ministry."
I guess I could be sounding self-righteous, S, Ill admit. I honestly do believe that I am nothing more than a sinner saved by grace and still capable, in my flesh, of all the sinfulness I ever performed as a bonafide sinner. But that is not the point.Svt4Him said:Do you get that from my post? We talk about love, but love keeps no record of wrong. It seems to me that in Christian circles it's ok, because we're talking about their sin, and we don't want to tolerate sin now do we, even if someone repents of it.
I don't doubt that at all.Asaph said:I disagree.
Jim M said:
I am wondering why Mr. Cain, because of his problem with alcoholism and homosexuality, did not simply step off the stage and either get some help or get him a job selling vacuum cleaners. Why did he persist in speaking for God and willfully deceiving people? The problem, as I view it, was not as much with his addictions and orientation as it was with his hypocrisy. Maybe he felt that alcohol and homosexuality were bigger than him and he could not control his cravings, but he could control his deception and lies. He willfully chose to deceive and betray good (albeit gullible) people for money (see 2 Cor. 2.17 below).
What deception's and lie's are you referring to Jim? The one's about his life style or the word's of God that came via him? Are you attacking both the man and the means that God used him? Are you calling God's gifting's and His using a man who was falling as deceptive and untrue?Jim M said:I am wondering why Mr. Cain, because of his problem with alcoholism and homosexuality, did not simply step off the stage and either get some help or get him a job selling vacuum cleaners. Why did he persist in speaking for God and willfully deceiving people? The problem, as I view it, was not as much with his addictions and orientation as it was with his hypocrisy. Maybe he felt that alcohol and homosexuality were bigger than him and he could not control his cravings, but he could control his deception and lies. He willfully chose to deceive and betray good (albeit gullible) people for money (see 2 Cor. 2.17 below).\o/
StevenL said:I don't doubt that at all.When you give some Scriptural reason for your disagreement using the actual words of the apostle, I'll know your disagreement is worth considering. Until then, I'll give it the place it deserves.
I am talking about the kind of deception that presents an image that is false. Perosnally, I do not know of the real accuracies of Cains prophecies and revelations, although I hear they are legendary. I have no qualms with the man. I pray that he will allow God to restore him.Quaffer said:What deception's and lie's are you referring to Jim? The one's about his life style or the word's of God that came via him? Are you attacking both the man and the means that God used him? Are you calling God's gifting's and His using a man who was falling as deceptive and untrue?
Scripture is full of stories where God used people who were not walking rightly with Him. Scripture say's that He love's us so much that He will make sure that we are exposed so as to be brought to repentance. . .but it does not say that in the process that God's gift's become fake and any less true. God spoke through a donkey, He can certaintly choose to speak through a frail man who even though not walking in unrightness with Him is still in tune with what He is saying to other's. Only God know's a man's heart and there but for the grace of God go I.
StevenL said:I'm not elevating myself and have mishandled nothing.You still haven't provided any Word showing the restoring of sinning, blaspheming "pastors" or "prophet" or "ministers" to the ministry.
Gal 6:1-10
6:1 Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness, considering yourself lest you also be tempted. 2 Bear one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ. 3 For if anyone thinks himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceives himself. 4 But let each one examine his own work, and then he will have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another. 5 For each one shall bear his own load.
"Restore such a one." That's not mishandled. It's easy reading of the English language. There's nothing in that passage about restoring "ministers" to an "office." Here's another one.
James 5:19 Brethren, if anyone among you wanders from the truth, and someone turns him back, 20let him know that he who turns a sinner from the error of his way will save a soul from death and cover a multitude of sins.
The one who turns the sinner, saves the sinner. But this still has nothing to do with defiled "preachers" being restored to their "ministry."
Galatians 1:6...2 Cor 5....totally irrelevant to what we're talking about here.
That is a great point. Now I should add that someone in sin should be removed, I don't think we have disagreement there. My issue is with the times all 'the others' who have fallen are brought up...again and again and again and again. God's forgiven them, God restores them, then why do we who are so loving constantly throw the records of their wrong around? That is my reference to David. But David repented and turned to God. If anyone found in sin does that, then it is not our responsibiliby to keep reminding God of it, as He's already forgot. This is different if Mr. Cain hasn't repented.The problem, as I see it, is that Mr. Cain willfully hid his sins from others while he defiantly continued to assume leadership. This, by any standard, is duplicity. I hope I made it clear that I am not judging his homosexual proclivities or his addiction. Those are sometimes beyond a mortals ability to successfully cope with. But lying and fraud are willful and reveal rebelliousness in an individual. I could respect a man who, realizing his problems as insurmountable, would quietly leave a position of leadership until he overcame his sinful actions rather than obstinately (perhaps defiantly) continue in them
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?