spicychick said:I totally agree pastors should be praised because they have alot of expirience to help everyone.
Mechwar said:But that is just the point....this pastor deliberately ostricized a member because of his sexual orientation. How is that helping people.
Reach out to the sinner and try to reclaim him with fellowship.
Ric said:It's not the UMC's table, it's the Lord's Table.
Onesimus85 said:Thanks for the correction Ric, I suppose if it were the UMC's table then only UMC members would be able to partake in it. Good Call.
Onesimus85 said:Your correction was fine. I'm use to bluntness. The wink helped to make sure it was in a loving manner. I hope that you are having a better day!
Book of Disciple , Social Principles: The Social Community: Rights of Racial and Ethnic Persons; http://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?mid=1746.Book of Disciple said:We define racial discrimination as the disparate treatment and lack of full access to resources and opportunities in the church and in society based on race or ethnicity. Therefore, we recognize racism as sin and affirm the ultimate and temporal worth of all persons.
Origen said:A question, not hypothetical, for those who think the pastor in Virginia acted correctly in denying membership to another:
Should Church membership be denied to whites who belong to whites-only social organizations outside the church, for example a country club?
For reference, the Church defines racism like this:
Book of Disciple , Social Principles: The Social Community: Rights of Racial and Ethnic Persons; http://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?mid=1746.
Origen said:A question, not hypothetical, for those who think the pastor in Virginia acted correctly in denying membership to another:
Should Church membership be denied to whites who belong to whites-only social organizations outside the church, for example a country club?
For reference, the Church defines racism like this:
Book of Disciple , Social Principles: The Social Community: Rights of Racial and Ethnic Persons; http://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?mid=1746.
sinner/SAVED said:Are there still "whites-only" clubs?
Origen said:A question, not hypothetical, for those who think the pastor in Virginia acted correctly in denying membership to another:
Should Church membership be denied to whites who belong to whites-only social organizations outside the church, for example a country club?
For reference, the Church defines racism like this:
Book of Disciple , Social Principles: The Social Community: Rights of Racial and Ethnic Persons; http://archives.umc.org/interior.asp?mid=1746.
Book of Discipline said:Section V. Church Membership
¶ 214. The United Methodist Church, a fellowship of believers, is as a church also an inherent part of the church universal, which is composed of all who accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and which in the Apostles' Creed we declare to be the holy catholic church. Therefore, all persons shall be eligible to attend its worship services, participate in its programs, receive the sacraments, and be admitted as baptized or professing members in any local church in the connection. (In the case of persons whose disabilities prevent them from assuming the vows for baptized or professing membership, their legal guardian(s) or sponsor(s), themselves members in full covenant relationship with God and the Church, the community of faith, may recite the appropriate vows on their behalf.)
sinner/SAVED said:Even in this scenario, the pastor has no right to deny membership to anyone who takes the vows of the UMC. ... I can find no reference in the discipline that states we must be sin-free prior to entering into membership.
Onesimus85 said:I agree that the church is not a museum for saints. However I believe that it is a place for equipping ministers of the Gospel. We, Christians, are all ministers. I have heard it said that the church is like a gym, we go there because we are trying to grow together and the best place to see how to grow is to be around those who are growing. However, it is useless for someone to join a gym if they have no intention of getting in shape or staying in shape. Likewise with the church. Numerous people join the church because they want to be affiliated with something. By saying "I belong to the Eastside Gym" one would assume I am interested in my physical health and practice an athletic or healthy lifestyle. By saying "I belong to Eastside UMC", one would think that a person is a Christian by association. However, numerous people become members of the church and are not Christians. We in the UMC are loosing are credibility, imo, because we have compromised our beliefs. In our day and age society is influencing the church rather than the church influencing society. The only way to bring the UMC and other churches back to the cross is for revival to sweep us again.
What fellowship does light have with darkness in the Body of Christ?