• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Pastor leaves Adventism

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
This is an open letter from Greg Taylor, a former SDA pastor who left Adventism:

http://www.truthorfables.com/Gregg_Taylor.htm

While I may not agree with his ultimate decision, it is plainly obvious that Greg's heart was being torn as he formulated this letter. His journey was painful and sad, to say the least. I felt moved to tears as I read how he struggled with his issues.

I also think he makes some pretty dead-on assessments of our present heirarchical system, the lack of passion in many of our congregations and some other areas as well.

Kudos to Ivan Blazen, Raoul Dederen and Hans LaRondelle for speaking out against sinless perfection at the time and confirming that not all of the professors at Andrews University believe or endorse it. The same holds true today, as George Knight will confirm.

Thoughts?
 
O

OntheDL

Guest
This is an open letter from Greg Taylor, a former SDA pastor who left Adventism:

http://www.ratzlaf.com/GTManifesto.pdf

While I may not agree with his ultimate decision, it is plainly obvious that Greg's heart was being torn as he formulated this letter. His journey was painful and sad, to say the least. I felt moved to tears as I read how he struggled with his issues.

I also think he makes some pretty dead-on assessments of our present heirarchical system, the lack of passion in many of our congregations and some other areas as well.

Kudos to Ivan Blazen, Raoul Dederen and Hans LaRondelle for speaking out against sinless perfection at the time and confirming that not all of the professors at Andrews University believe or endorse it. The same holds true today, as George Knight will confirm.

Thoughts?

The bible supports the sinless perfection doctrine from Genesis to Revelation. I'm sorry that people don't accept it. Why can't they have the best of both worlds? Give me what I want and dont tell me what to do.

Thanks for bringing it up again.
 
Upvote 0

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
No it does not, and I can provide you with a long list of Adventist scholars, authors and professors who will verify this fact.

Yes, I will bring it up as often as I want and I will go after it like a pitbull, because I believe it is full-blown heresy. Theology and doctrine are fair game on this forum, so that is my right.

Obviously you didn't even read the letter nor do you care to, as you didn't even address any of its contents and bypassed it in favor of a side issue.
 
Upvote 0
O

OntheDL

Guest
No it does not, and I can provide you with a long list of Adventist scholars, authors and professors who will verify this fact.
Who cares what they think? It's irrelevant. What said the Lord???

I can provide you with even longer list of the scriptures plainly stating perfection is required of us.

Yes, I will bring it up as often as I want and I will go after it like a pitbull, because I believe it is full-blown heresy. Theology and doctrine are fair game on this forum, so that is my right.
Have at it. I'm not losing any sleep over it because the bible says 'Be thou perfect even as your Father who is in heaven', 'Be holy for I AM holy'......

Obviously you didn't even read the letter nor do you care to, as you didn't even address any of its contents and bypassed it in favor of a side issue.
You serious? That was 33 pages. There are ton of people leaving adventist church. I know some personally. Sad but I can do nothing to save them, can't even save myself.

Side issue? This is what seperates Adventism from all other denominations. This is the heart of contention.

Is Adventist structure faultless? Far from it. But I'm not leaving because of these issues.
 
Upvote 0

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Who cares what they think? It's irrelevant. What said the Lord???

I see. You know more than our scholars and professors. Interesting...

I can provide you with even longer list of the scriptures plainly stating perfection is required of us.

All taken out of context, misinterpreted and misapplied. I have heard all of them before, and not one is saying we must achieve flawless, sinless perfection before glorification.

Have at it. I'm not losing any sleep over it because the bible says 'Be thou perfect even as your Father who is in heaven', 'Be holy for I AM holy'......

There is not even a hint that this is speaking about sinless perfection. A word study will show that it is being used here to denote 'completeness'. This word is also used to describe Abraham, David, etc. all who were far from the idealized 'pefection' you proffer. It's speaking about the fruits of the Spirit, being merciful as your father is merciful, etc.

You serious? That was 33 pages. There are ton of people leaving adventist church. I know some personally. Sad but I can do nothing to save them, can't even save myself.

I didn't ask you to do anything for him. I just wanted feedback on wether Greg made some valid points or not. His leaving is a moot issue, he is already gone. What can we learn from his observations about the church?

Side issue? This is what seperates Adventism from all other denomination. This is the heart of contention.

No, this is what causes much of mainline Protestantism to relegate us to the heterodox/cult bin.

Is Adventist structure faultless? Far from it. But I'm not leaving because of these issues.

Who is saying anyone is pressuring you to leave? Is it too much to ask that you read the letter and acknowledge Greg might have some valid points without it having to be a devious plan to pull you out of the church?

Sheesh. The paranoia knows no bounds! :doh:
 
Upvote 0

Cliff2

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2004
3,831
63
74
✟26,993.00
Faith
SDA
This is an open letter from Greg Taylor, a former SDA pastor who left Adventism:

http://www.ratzlaf.com/GTManifesto.pdf

While I may not agree with his ultimate decision, it is plainly obvious that Greg's heart was being torn as he formulated this letter. His journey was painful and sad, to say the least. I felt moved to tears as I read how he struggled with his issues.

I also think he makes some pretty dead-on assessments of our present heirarchical system, the lack of passion in many of our congregations and some other areas as well.

Kudos to Ivan Blazen, Raoul Dederen and Hans LaRondelle for speaking out against sinless perfection at the time and confirming that not all of the professors at Andrews University believe or endorse it. The same holds true today, as George Knight will confirm.

Thoughts?

I read it through and I cannot agree with much of his conclusions about the New Testament Sabbath.
 
Upvote 0
O

OntheDL

Guest
Who cares what they think? It's irrelevant. What said the Lord???

I see. You know more than our scholars and professors. Interesting...
Excuse me? Who is the fundation of your faith? The Word of God or what the theologians say??? Didn't you just say in another thread something to the effect that some of us don't use our brains and blindly follow others?
I can provide you with even longer list of the scriptures plainly stating perfection is required of us.

All taken out of context, misinterpreted and misapplied. I have heard all of them before, and not one is saying we must achieve flawless, sinless perfection before glorification.

Have at it. I'm not losing any sleep over it because the bible says 'Be thou perfect even as your Father who is in heaven', 'Be holy for I AM holy'......

There is not even a hint that this is speaking about sinless perfection. A word study will show that it is being used here to denote 'completeness'. This word is also used to describe Abraham, David, etc. all who were far from the idealized 'pefection' you proffer. It's speaking about the fruits of the Spirit, being merciful as your father is merciful, etc.
Taken out of context?

1 Thess 5:23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Romans 12
1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.
2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

What are you going to say? That Christ's righteousness is credited to us? True that's how we are justified. But we still to need be sanctified (made holy). Not one verse in the bible that says we can still sin and go to heaven at the same time. No body says we can do it by our own power. But by grace, all things are possible. Whats all? Overcoming sins is not part of all things? Hello?

1 Peter 2
21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps:
22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth:

We are called to follow His steps, His example. What example? It says in vs 22 did no sin.

1 Cor 10:13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it.

It says God will not allow you to be tempted above you are able to resist. So whats your excuse for sinning? I'm not saying I've reached the condition of sinless perfection. But that's my goal. With God all things are possible. And He is stronger than him who is in the world.

1 John 4:4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

1 John 2
1 My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.
3 And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.
4 He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

1 John 3
6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
10 In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

Pretty plain, not commentary needed.

Spirit of Prophecy puts it even plainer.

Everyone who by faith obeys God's commandments, will reach the condition of sinlessness in which Adam lived before his transgression. ---Maranatha, p224.

You serious? That was 33 pages. There are ton of people leaving adventist church. I know some personally. Sad but I can do nothing to save them, can't even save myself.

I didn't ask you to do anything for him. I just wanted feedback on wether Greg made some valid points or not. His leaving is a moot issue, he is already gone. What can we learn from his observations about the church?

Side issue? This is what seperates Adventism from all other denomination. This is the heart of contention.

No, this is what causes much of mainline Protestantism to relegate us to the heterodox/cult bin.
Again, dont care what anybody says. I never do.

The new christian religion was once called a sect, did you know? I don't care what people call me. I know who I am and what I believe.

Is Adventist structure faultless? Far from it. But I'm not leaving because of these issues.

Who is saying anyone is pressuring you to leave? Is it too much to ask that you read the letter and acknowledge Greg might have some valid points without it having to be a devious plan to pull you out of the church?

Sheesh. The paranoia knows no bounds! :doh:
Did I say anyone pressured me into leaving? It was merely an expression of saying those (organizational and structural) things are not key issues. Talk about paranoia!
 
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
What is more, some experts from the White Estate came to the campus with a lawyer’s report that exonerated E.G. White of legal culpability

in the plagiarism charges. While I know today that this was only because of the legal loopholes in the law of her day, not because it was not illegal or wrong, it still quieted my thinking.​

That's pure nonsense. He hasn't studied the issue in sufficient depth to know what he is talking about. He is, as one wrote a "tyro" "in law and literature." Ramik's report had nothing to do with "legal loopholes." This guy is just looking for hooks by which to grab people to make the same foolish mistake he made.

Anyone who claims that Ellen White was a plagiarist doesn't know what they are talking about. And they don't even know that they don't know.
 
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I remember praying, "Why, Lord, if the
Sabbath is so significant and part of your moral law that is binding on all Christians, why are you​
clearly blessing other churches, while the Adventist churches are, at best, maintaining?"

This reflects a naive concept of Christianity on his part--obviously hasn't studied the concept of "remnant" in the OT. Those who truly follow God will always be a minority. Look at 1844, did the majority of Christians eagerly await for the return of Christ or did they boot those who did out of their churches? And of those who claimed to be looking for His soon return how many remained after the Great Disappointment?
 
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I learned from Colossians 2:16-17, Galatians 4:10, Romans 14:5-6, and Hebrews 3-4, that
Sabbath was an institution that pointed forward to Jesus and therefore was no longer binding on​
Christians.

If he had studied Col. 2:16-7 carefully he would have learned that Paul isn't even talking about the seventh-day Sabbath. See http://www.666man.net/Colossians_2_16-17_By_David_Conklin/colintro.html. And if had done a bit of research (and a careful reading of the text itself) into it he would have found that in Col. 2:16 it prersupposes that the believers were keeping the feast days, new moons and ceremonial sabbaths. And yet Paul doesn't chew them out for it! So, what does that tell you about the days in Gal. 4 and Rom 14? Hebrews 4 supports the SDA position and doesn't run contrary to it. The Sabbath was clearly given as a memorial not a type. I really have to question how much thought this guy put into this.
 
Upvote 0

freeindeed2

In Christ We Are FREE!
Feb 1, 2007
31,130
20,046
56
A mile high.
✟87,197.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This reflects a naive concept of Christianity on his part--obviously hasn't studied the concept of "remnant" in the OT. Those who truly follow God will always be a minority. Look at 1844, did the majority of Christians eagerly await for the return of Christ or did they boot those who did out of their churches? And of those who claimed to be looking for His soon return how many remained after the Great Disappointment?
The majority followed the Bible's warnings AGAINST knowing the time of Christ's return and they were NOT disappointed. Should we always side with the minority (which Christianity is!). What about the Branch Davidians? Heaven's Gate? Jim Jones? The 'minority' within Christianity isn't a good place to be.
 
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
There are ton of people leaving adventist church. I know some personally.


I know one! ONE! And he quit because he wasn't asked to be head elder and wrote a long letter attacking the church and Ellen White to my parents. When he was attacking the church he supplied "sources" to confirm what he said. But, oddly enough (and I picked up on it) he didn't supply a source for his claims against EGW--I told mey folks that as because he didn't have any--he had made it up as if we were going to believe it just because he said it--much like this ex-pastor.
 
Upvote 0

StormyOne

Senior Veteran
Aug 21, 2005
5,424
47
65
Alabama
✟5,866.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The majority followed the Bible's warnings AGAINST knowing the time of Christ's return and they were NOT disappointed. Should we always side with the minority (which Christianity is!). What about the Branch Davidians? Heaven's Gate? Jim Jones? The 'minority' within Christianity isn't a good place to be.
good point.... I like that.... gonna have to remember to use that one...
 
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I got a call from a friend that I know is in love with Jesus like few others in my life. I have great respect for his walk with the Lord and commitment to following Him no matter the cost. He opened up to me and shared that he had been studying the Sabbath and was not sure our SDA position was biblically based on the New Testament.

Note that the "friend" is unnamed. In psych courses they will tell you that when someone comes in and says "I have this friend who has this problem you see ..." you can safely assume that there's no such friend. The problem being presented is called a "presented problem"--it is a test to see how you deal with it.

Secondly, note that the flaw is in trying to "justify" keeping the Sabbath solely from the NT--we are whole Bible Christians.

Third, we should note that we have no proof that this person actually exists and that any of the alleged events actually occurred. Kind of like the Baghdad Diary which was supposedly written by a soldier in the front line but now turns out to be fiction.
 
Upvote 0
O

OntheDL

Guest
[/color][/font]

I know one! ONE! And he quit because he wasn't asked to be head elder and wrote a long letter attacking the church and Ellen White to my parents. When he was attacking the church he supplied "sources" to confirm what he said. But, oddly enough (and I picked up on it) he didn't supply a source for his claims against EGW--I told mey folks that as because he didn't have any--he had made it up as if we were going to believe it just because he said it--much like this ex-pastor.

One thing I've learned is that you can't stop a quiter from quiting and you can't stop a loser from losing.
 
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Meanwhile, a couple of my friends in similar ministries left Adventism to start nondenominational churches. Their initial separation from the SDA church was a result of financial issues between themselves and the conferences they were in. They were struggling to support a full church ministry and send 100% of their tithe away to the conference.

Tithe isn't to be used to run a VBS, or stop smoking seminar's or vege cooking classes etc. It is to be used solely for teaching the Bible--teachers and pastors.

Again, no evidence that these "friends" actually existed or even that this was the cause of them leaving the church.

Watch more Law and Order and CSI and learn how to tell the difference between evidence and hear-say.
 
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
One thing I've learned is that you can't stop a quiter from quiting and you can't stop a loser from losing.

Right on!

When the going gets tough (one of God's "tools" to weed out the chaff) the quitters quit--obviously these people didn't take the lesson of Job to heart.
 
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
The majority followed the Bible's warnings AGAINST knowing the time of Christ's return and they were NOT disappointed. Should we always side with the minority (which Christianity is!). What about the Branch Davidians? Heaven's Gate? Jim Jones? The 'minority' within Christianity isn't a good place to be.

The remnant will always be a minority--but that does not mean, as you took it, that we find the truth by counting noses--study the Bible and you will see.
 
Upvote 0

djconklin

Moderate SDA
Sep 8, 2003
4,019
26
75
Visit site
✟26,806.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
The “sabbaths” in this common Old Testament construction always refer to the weekly Sabbath.


That is a flat-out lie--so now you know what you are dealing with. If you examine how the word "feast" in the Bible is used (http://www.666man.net/Colossians_2_16-17_By_David_Conklin/feast.html) you will find that two ceremonial sabbaths are never EVER called "feasts." Therefore, in those days if you wished to list the ceremonial days of the year without actually naming them you would say/write "feasts, new moons, and sabbath."
 
Upvote 0