One of the things I LOVE about this man is his need to learn for himself.
He's not locked into dogma. This old hillbilly guy has learned six languages and has revealed many bad translations within the English translations.
One of them has to do with the word for apple. He purports that the word apple that they used was actually an euphemism for sexual knowledge in it's day.
Combine that with the fact that it says that first was Cain and then she
continued in birth to deliver Abel. Medically, two father twins are possible.
So, he believes that
satan came to Eve, had sex with her, (shared the tree of knowledge) then she called Adam over and had sex with him.
Later she gave birth to twins, each from a different father. And when you think about it. It's kinda beautiful. The good and evil struggle. The whole test. Starting right at the source what brought it upon us. There is a balance to that.
Weather I believe this or not is inconsequential. The fact that this man is a monster of knowledge about the bible. And more importantly, about the original bible in it's original text, is nothing to be scoffed at.
Furthermore, he's an archeologist. He was one waaaaay before the church realized that the earth is a little
older than they had previously thought.
He's a militant, who cares not what anybody thinks of him. He was out there digging in the rocks while everybody else was wondering what he was doing. They would literally ridicule him for that. Seems he was dead on about that one, huh? And everybody called this guy a kook. They couldn't understand the conflict. But for him, there was no conflict. All he wanted was the truth. Whatever it may be. EVEN IF IT HURT HIM.
So, when someone flippantly makes ruse of this guys teachings, they cancel themselves out to all the really cool stuff that he does reveal.
Also, rather that say something like "This guy's a nut... he says this, or that." Try actually going to the verses he quotes IN THEIR ORIGINAL TEXT and intelligently challenge him. Otherwise, you've contributed nothing.
I'm all for that. But this TOE THE LINE attitude about learning the bible is counterproductive. There are places where this man is an invaluable source of information.
If a person wants to appear more intelligent than another. They must demonstrate why. Not just quote what someone else says, call him an idiot, and hope your peers agree. That's the ping pong way to lern. Just bouncing stuff off each other and go with what sticks.
IF HE'S WRONG, BE INTELLIGENT AND TELL US WHY.
This also reinforces my belief that NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE STUDY THE BIBLE FOR THEMSELVES. Alone...you and the bible.
While I don't purport all that Arnold Murray has to say. I will not cast him off as a source of other jems. And I will not discount what he says without a Strong's Concordance. Much better than just "seein what my friends think."
Which leaves me with this.... My soul is my responsibility. When I get to the judgment I can't say..."but Lord, he told me this, or that"
Because he will just respond with...."But I gave you the Bible and all the tools as well."
-