• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
For me the movie Passengers raises a long list of fascinating questions. That doesn't mean I intend to defend it as a good film, but the criticism that surrounded the film is part of what intrigues me.

Rather than spew a long list of questions, I'll start with just one, and if that dies out I'll bring up some of the others.

So, my first question regards themes of redemption & forgiveness. The biggest criticism of the movie was the fact that Aurora Lane would agree to marry Jim Preston given the horrible thing he did to her. So what is your position? Is Jim's action unforgiveable? If not, what would need to happen before Aurora can believably forgive him?
 
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
The ship suffered very serious malfunctions that is nobody's fault.

Tough to be alone, with no one to talk to for many years would drive many insane.

There were all victims of these unfortunate events.

I think she had a right to be angry - very angry. I will note that the film put her in a similar circumstance - the possibility that she was going to be alone. It was only then that she forgave him, and I find that plausible - the idea that she had to understand why he did it. But should there be more to it?

I don't think it is believable that she would ever forgive him. She may pretend to for the sake of their existence together, but it would always be there inside, festering away, ready to return at any moment.

So you believe some things are unforgivable. What types of things rise to that level? To that end, I will also ask if you think Gus was unforgivable as well? IMO that is a flaw in the movie. She appealed to him for justice - for help in punishing Jim, and he brushed her off. Yet she didn't seem angry with him for doing that. He became the adored member of the team. Why?

[edit] I'll add that forgiveness doesn't mean forgetting or the elimination of consequences.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

It's Metropolis! Enjoy the stay!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
25,635
12,129
Space Mountain!
✟1,468,169.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others


So, after all of that, I guess a guy in Jim's position needs to be incredibly good looking, then, and only then, she'll find a way in her heart to "forgive" him. ... at least, that's what Hollywood seems to make it look like here.

Still, it's one of my favorite movies because of the social issues it handles metaphorically and philosophically.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jon Osterman

Well-Known Member
Jan 23, 2018
716
473
Glasgow
✟74,048.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Gus has no responsibility to deliver "justice" on her behalf. So it would be unreasonable to be (too) angry with him. Jim, on the other hand, willfully "stole" her life on their destination planet from her. Like I said, you may try to forgive, intellectually, but emotionally I don't think it is possible. It certainly wouldn't be for me. Note that I am not saying that is right, or what God would want, it is just human limitation.
 
Upvote 0

Resha Caner

Expert Fool
Sep 16, 2010
9,171
1,398
✟163,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married

I see. I can understand that.

Gus has no responsibility to deliver "justice" on her behalf. So it would be unreasonable to be (too) angry with him.

Actually, Gus does have that responsibility. He's a crew member, and the only one who's awake. He, therefore, represents the captain. He's the commanding officer.

His attitude is very different, though. His life was 'stolen' as well, even if not by Jim. But he expresses two thoughts:
* Aurora knew the risks when she signed aboard
* Aurora needs to understand why Jim did what he did before she decides how to treat him

So, here's another question for you. If you were a passenger along with a loved one, and the loved one was awakened, destined to spend their life alone, would you want that loved one to wake you up or leave you to continue your journey?

My wife and I agreed we would want to be waked up.
 
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

timewerx

the village i--o--t--
Aug 31, 2012
17,180
6,471
✟401,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
I think she had a right to be angry - very angry. I will note that the film put her in a similar circumstance - the possibility that she was going to be alone. It was only then that she forgave him, and I find that plausible

Jim got woken up by the malfunctioning computer

Aurora got woken up by Jim whose mind has gone nuts when the computer got him out of hibernation with no chance of return and the ensuing loneliness.

Jim's thinking has been compromised by the situation / loneliness that wasn't his fault at all. No longer capable of making rational decisions.

Although both of them is expected to be very angry by the events, there's really no one to blame here. Jim's accountability in the situation is simply not enough to be denied forgiveness.
 
Upvote 0