I'd like to suggest the opening of a Preterist/Partial Preterist section of Eschatology.
There are sometimes logical discussions and insights that are cut short that may actually not be 'full preterists' in their scope, but simply inductively exploring all avenues of interpretation and understanding rather than repeating and arguing over the status quo.
That section could begin with a sticky defining what the heresy of Hymenaus and Philatius truly was at that time.
There are sometimes logical discussions and insights that are cut short that may actually not be 'full preterists' in their scope, but simply inductively exploring all avenues of interpretation and understanding rather than repeating and arguing over the status quo.
That section could begin with a sticky defining what the heresy of Hymenaus and Philatius truly was at that time.