OK one last try.
J19 your claim was that Dawkins the Selfish Gene had been
'proven wrong'.
You then linked to material from Corning that in no way proved your point, in fact an article that started by saying how useful the Selfish Gene was.
Then we moved onto a 'New Tree of Life' which whilst intereresting was irrevevent to your claim.
Now we move to Wilson, and yes Wilson thinks Dawkins is wrong about the usefulness of the Selfish Gene however you claim Dawkins has been
'proven wrong'. This you have consistently failed to demonstrate.
I have huge admiration for Wilson, his early work 'wrote the book' on the evolution of eusocial animals.
However he is wrong to claim that his 2010 paper with Nowak and Tarnita has put an end to the Selfish Gene and that most scientists agree with him.
That 2010 paper
The evolution of eusociality (sorry paywall only abstract) has not been acepted, far from it, 137 of the World's leading evolutionary biologists wrote a critical reponse
Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality (paywall again only abastract).
Also this 2015 paper
Relatedness, Conflict, and the Evolution of Eusociality shows where they (WIlson, Nowak and Tarnita) went wrong.
Dawkins might turn out to be completely wrong about everything, one day someone might show the Selfish Gene concept to be utterly wrong but that hasn't happened yet your intial claim is false.