Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
PA, MI, WI, NC, FL, AZ
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mark46" data-source="post: 74708950" data-attributes="member: 257078"><p>States have a gimmick, a way around an amendment. For example, by state law, the electors of California must vote for the candidate who won a majority of the popular vote nationally, not the candidate who won the majority of the votes in CA. The Electoral College is retained, but made irrelevant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mark46, post: 74708950, member: 257078"] States have a gimmick, a way around an amendment. For example, by state law, the electors of California must vote for the candidate who won a majority of the popular vote nationally, not the candidate who won the majority of the votes in CA. The Electoral College is retained, but made irrelevant. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
PA, MI, WI, NC, FL, AZ
Top
Bottom