- May 19, 2017
- 3,461
- 572
- 51
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Calvary Chapel
- Marital Status
- Married
'nuff said!
That's not what totalitarian means.They are tota!itarian, if they don't have an equivalent of the 2nd amandment.
Say what? Canada is totalitarian? Perhaps, rather than just deciding in advance that your idea is correct and that only a constitutional right to bear arms can prevent totalitarianism, you might consider testing your idea against the real world. In the real world, lots of countries aren't totalitarian without most of their citizens being armed.They are tota!itarian, if they don't have an equivalent of the 2nd amandment.
Nothing They all signed up, totally.So what keeps the governments of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Great Britain, France, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Iceland, Belgium, and Holland from becoming totalitarian?
This claim has nothing to do with your prior claim, that a country without a "right to bear arms" has a totalitarian government.A citizen has the rigt to protect himself from such things as illegal search and seizure.
You keep changing topics. That makes it difficult to engage with you. Are you playing a joke on us? If not, can we return to the actual topic that you proposed?In thd real world, the United States has a history. Evidently you didn't do so well in that subject. I did okay in it, but I know enough to understand that all of the Constitution is important.
Comes as a surprise to me not to mention the citizens of the other countries in that list.They are tota!itarian, if they don't have an equivalent of the 2nd amendment.
The next step after that would be to repeal the first amendment, at which time certain Americans would fight. But since they won't have the right to bear arms, they will be fighting with their fists against a totalitarian, Antichrist government implementing the mark of the beast on everyone. God please let it be a pre-tribulation rapture! That is all I have to say...If "all of the Constitution is important," as you say, then why has it been amended so many times? Amendments can even repeal other amendments. If a new amendment repealed the second, would that amendment be important?