• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Does the Holy Bible support the notion of Original Sin?

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 45.5%
  • No

    Votes: 6 54.5%

  • Total voters
    11

fatboys

Senior Veteran
Nov 18, 2003
9,231
280
72
✟68,575.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I found more of your reply buried................

Sin and death entered the world because Adam was guilty, not because he was innocent. Adam knew that obeying God = good, disobeying Him = bad. And he also knew ahead of time that there would be grave consequences if he disobeyed and ate. Adam was innocent before he ate and guilty afterwards, especially since he knew beforehand (as I said in an earlier thread, there has probably never been a man in history who had more knowledge and understanding that something was wrong/bad to do than Adam did concerning eating the forbidden fruit, since the commandment came directly from God's lips to his ears ;)).

Christ's "innocence" is less "powerful" that Adam's sin :scratch: You are definitely going to need to elaborate a little bit further on that one! Thanks!
I think I understand the problem you are having in understanding what I am trying to say. Adam was guilty of disobedience. That is correct. a person can disobey and still be innocent. Babies do this all the time. They do not have enough experience to navigate through life until they gain knowledge of right and wrong. It does not do any good to tell a little child not to go close to the bank of a river or they could fall in and drown. They haven't a clue what drowning is and they have not yet acquired the fear of what might happen. So they go close and plop they fall in. Did they sin. No. The disobeyed and the consequences are the same if they were older and understood what drowning is. The little child is innocent. But they disobeyed.
 
Upvote 0

ewq1938

Well-Known Member
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Site Supporter
Nov 5, 2011
45,360
6,895
✟1,020,556.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I think I understand the problem you are having in understanding what I am trying to say. Adam was guilty of disobedience. That is correct. a person can disobey and still be innocent.


Adam was not deceived and yet still sinned plus God punished him for what he did so he was not innocent. He was guilty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: St_Worm2
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,146
45,799
68
✟3,113,708.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I think I understand the problem you are having in understanding what I am trying to say. Adam was guilty of disobedience. That is correct. a person can disobey and still be innocent. Babies do this all the time. They do not have enough experience to navigate through life until they gain knowledge of right and wrong. It does not do any good to tell a little child not to go close to the bank of a river or they could fall in and drown.

Hi Fatboys, while I can't disagree with the absolute uselessness of telling a baby to do well .. anything .. why would God chose to do that very thing in the case of our first parents (see Genesis 2:16-17) if what you are saying about Adam and Eve's cognitive functioning is true (that they only had the mind of an infant) :scratch: What would be the point?

The fact is, an infant CANNOT obey OR disobey anything as they simply aren't capable of such a thing, but Adam was neither an infant, nor did he have the mind of an infant. Here is some of what went on in Adam's life (what he thought, what he said, the choices he had to make, and what he was expected to do) during the time you claim that he only had such understanding and reasoning abilities:

"The LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being. The LORD God planted a garden toward the east, in Eden; and there He placed the man whom He had formed .. to cultivate and to keep it". Genesis 2:7-8 + 15b

"The LORD God commanded the man, saying, “From any tree of the garden you may eat freely; but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat from it you will surely die.” Genesis 2:16-17

"The LORD God said, It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him. Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. The man gave names to all the cattle, and to the birds of the sky, and to every beast of the field, but for Adam there was not found a helper suitable for him. So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. The LORD God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man. The man said, 'This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; She shall be called woman, because she was taken out of man.'” Genesis 2:18-23

You know there is more, including the decisions they both made to eat the forbidden fruit in the following chapter. Question, how much of what Adam did or said at this point in his life would your children have been able to do or say when they were infants? Does anything he did sound like something an "infant" would be capable of or expected to do?

Fatboys, Adam KNEW what he was doing, he KNEW it was wrong, and he KNEW he would die (and he was punished BECAUSE he knew and understood, not because he didn't .. Genesis 2:16-17; Genesis 3:14-19).

If an unsupervised baby or toddler wanders too close to the bank of a river and drowns as a result, it is a great tragedy, but the baby didn't receive the "consequences of its actions", nor would we ever say that it did.

Adam and Eve had the necessary mental faculties needed to make a real choice in the matter that was set before them (Genesis 2:16-17). And that they both understood what they did was wrong can be seen in their immediate choices to 1) hide from God .. Genesis 3:8, and then, 2) when found, try to levy the blame for their sinful choices on someone else .. Genesis 3:12-13).

Also, the consequences Adam and Eve received were "imposed" on them by God, and they received what they deserved because they knew better. If our first parents had nothing more than the mind of an infant to work with, God would have never given them a "command" to obey in the first place :preach:

Yours and His,
David
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BigDaddy4
Upvote 0

fatboys

Senior Veteran
Nov 18, 2003
9,231
280
72
✟68,575.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hi Fatboys, while I can't disagree with the absolute uselessness of telling a baby to do well .. anything .. why would God chose to do that very thing in the case of our first parents (see Genesis 2:16-17) if what you are saying about Adam and Eve's cognitive functioning is true (that they only had the mind of an infant) :scratch: What would be the point?

The fact is, an infant CANNOT obey OR disobey anything as they simply aren't capable of such a thing, but Adam was neither an infant, nor did he have the mind of an infant. Here is some of what went on in Adam's life (what he thought, what he said, the choices he had to make, and what he was expected to do) during the time you claim that he only had such understanding and reasoning abilities:

"The LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being. The LORD God planted a garden toward the east, in Eden; and there He placed the man whom He had formed .. to cultivate and to keep it". Genesis 2:7-8 + 15b

"The LORD God commanded the man, saying, “From any tree of the garden you may eat freely; but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat from it you will surely die.” Genesis 2:16-17

"The LORD God said, It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him. Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called a living creature, that was its name. The man gave names to all the cattle, and to the birds of the sky, and to every beast of the field, but for Adam there was not found a helper suitable for him. So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then He took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh at that place. The LORD God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man, and brought her to the man. The man said, 'This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; She shall be called woman, because she was taken out of man.'” Genesis 2:18-23

You know there is more, including the decisions they both made to eat the forbidden fruit in the following chapter. Question, how much of what Adam did or said at this point in his life would your children have been able to do or say when they were infants? Does anything he did sound like something an "infant" would be capable of or expected to do?

Fatboys, Adam KNEW what he was doing, he KNEW it was wrong, and he KNEW he would die (and he was punished BECAUSE he knew and understood, not because he didn't .. Genesis 2:16-17; Genesis 3:14-19).

If an unsupervised baby or toddler wanders too close to the bank of a river and drowns as a result, it is a great tragedy, but the baby didn't receive the "consequences of its actions", nor would we ever say that it did.

Adam and Eve had the necessary mental faculties needed to make a real choice in the matter that was set before them (Genesis 2:16-17). And that they both understood what they did was wrong can be seen in their immediate choices to 1) hide from God .. Genesis 3:8, and then, 2) when found, try to levy the blame for their sinful choices on someone else .. Genesis 3:12-13).

Also, the consequences Adam and Eve received were "imposed" on them by God, and they received what they deserved because they knew better. If our first parents had nothing more than the mind of an infant to work with, God would have never given them a "command" to obey in the first place :preach:

Yours and His,
David
Adam was not a little baby. He had great amount of knowledge. What he didn't have was experience. I'll give you an example. When I was growing up a professor that taught math at the university bought a 200 acre peice of property next to us. It was not property that produced a lot from it because it wasn't level and the soil was heavy clay. Now days it would have been considered a wetland. Well he hired a construction company that had theses big carry alls level the ground. This made it so he could water it better. The next thing he did was to get rid of the native grass and planted a university variety that was suppose to grow well in that soil type. Every year in the spring he would fertilize it. Every year he would have someone come in and cut rake and bale the hay. He did everything right but it produced less than when it was in the native grass. My dad became friends with him and tried to tell hm that he was throwing his money away. I did a lot of work for him for free. Now here is a man that had a great amount of knowledge and resource at his beck and call. He had never lived on a farm and was raised in the city. He was innocent when it came to farming because he lacked experience. He finally sold the property to a cattleman who fenced and cross fenced it. The land has since gone back to native grasses and the cattleman summers 100 pair on it. The point is that you can have great amount of knowledge but lack experience.
 
Upvote 0

fatboys

Senior Veteran
Nov 18, 2003
9,231
280
72
✟68,575.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Adam was not deceived and yet still sinned plus God punished him for what he did so he was not innocent. He was guilty.
I have never said that Adam and Eve were not guilty. They disobeyed. They did so without having enough knowledge of the consequences of their choice. They were innocent
 
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,146
45,799
68
✟3,113,708.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
...if I put two children in a room with a razor blade, and tell them they can play with anything but the razor blade, I'm not a bad guy, right?

Hi HS, I see you understand and agree with LDS teaching about the extent of our progenitors' mental faculties in the Garden, as well their version of the God of the Bible who their Creation theology turns into a deceiver and a sadist :eek: (which is something I pointed out earlier in this thread). Of course, that's not what the Bible (or Christianity) teaches about our first parents or the character of God :preach:

Adam/Eve knew and understood the consequences of their actions like no one else in our race ever has, because they got their facts and their understanding of those facts, directly from God Himself. Hey, assuming you're wrong about God, what the Mormon's teach about Adam/Eve could be very helpful to you :oldthumbsup: .. because if they're right, and the information and the understanding that Adam/Eve possessed when they sinned was not enough to condemn/punish them, how can God possibly hold anything against you?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

fatboys

Senior Veteran
Nov 18, 2003
9,231
280
72
✟68,575.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hi HS, I see you understand and agree with LDS teaching about the extent of our progenitors' mental faculties in the Garden, as well their version of the God of the Bible who their Creation theology turns into a deceiver and a sadist :eek: (which is something I pointed out earlier in this thread). Of course, that's not what the Bible (or Christianity) teaches about our first parents or the character of God :preach:

Adam/Eve knew and understood the consequences of their actions like no one else in our race ever has, because they got their facts and their understanding of those facts, directly from God Himself. Hey, assuming you're wrong about God, what the Mormon's teach about Adam/Eve could be very helpful to you :oldthumbsup: .. because if they're right, and the information and the understanding that Adam/Eve possessed when they sinned was not enough to condemn/punish them, how can God possibly hold anything against you?
He didn't deceive them. They were given freedom to choose. They could have remained in the garden but our progression depended on them disobeying. It is a shame that you are so focused on trying to make it what it is it. It is a shame that as hard and simple of a plan God has that you have to decieve you self into thinking that your way is the only way. It is a shame that as sincere as you were when you were asking questions that your goal was to change our faith into what you beleive. That is deception as well
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Hi HS, I see you understand and agree with LDS teaching about the extent of our progenitors' mental faculties in the Garden, as well their version of the God of the Bible who their Creation theology turns into a deceiver and a sadist :eek: (which is something I pointed out earlier in this thread). Of course, that's not what the Bible (or Christianity) teaches about our first parents or the character of God :preach:

Adam/Eve knew and understood the consequences of their actions like no one else in our race ever has, because they got their facts and their understanding of those facts, directly from God Himself. Hey, assuming you're wrong about God, what the Mormon's teach about Adam/Eve could be very helpful to you :oldthumbsup: .. because if they're right, and the information and the understanding that Adam/Eve possessed when they sinned was not enough to condemn/punish them, how can God possibly hold anything against you?
IMO, the story of A/E and the GoE is best understood as a fable. There is no other reasonable explanation for this account, when considered in context.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
He didn't deceive them. They were given freedom to choose. They could have remained in the garden but our progression depended on them disobeying. It is a shame that you are so focused on trying to make it what it is it. It is a shame that as hard and simple of a plan God has that you have to decieve you self into thinking that your way is the only way. It is a shame that as sincere as you were when you were asking questions that your goal was to change our faith into what you beleive. That is deception as well
Much in the same way a child might choose to handle a razor blade when instructed not to, and left alone to his own devices. I won't even throw a talking Teddy bear into the mix.
 
Upvote 0