- Feb 24, 2004
- 1,510
- 85
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Humanist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
This quote by Henny in another thread got me thinking about the nature of the western formulation of Christianity:
You could hear this in a Christian sermon: If you dont believe in original sin, the consequence of Adam and Eves disobedience, just throw out Jesus and Mary you dont need them.
Essentially, the (Western) Doctrine of Original Sin teaches that somehow we inherited this primeval defect, man's nature is fallen, and that our souls entered the world tainted. It is further taught that Yeshuas passion atoned/reversed the sin of Adam and Eves disobedience and that Yeshua "..came into the world to save sinners."
Hix made the following point in a thread seeking to identify some sort of orthodoxy in MJism (emphasis mine):
Some Christological discussion focusing on these three issues could be productive:
1. Original Sin, is it contrary to Torah?
2. The divinity of Christ. Might it be better if MJ represented a middle ground, so to speak? Something like, Yeshua is the Jewish Messiah, but he never claimed to be divine nor is he divine in the sense that HaShem is divine.
3. Should we occupy ourselves less with the temporal human Yeshua in favour of the eternal logos, the Cosmic Christ as Matthew Fox* terms him? Might this lead to a clearer understanding of his earthly mission and to a definition of his divinity mutually acceptable to both Christians and Messianics?
What do you think?
*Matthew Fox is a defrocked Dominican (Catholic) Priest who was excommunicated for his heretical beliefs. Among his many books are, Coming of the Cosmic Christ and Original Blessing.
Christians ... from an historically Western/Hellenistic cultural platform, Messianics generally from an historically Eastern/Jewish cultural platform. While vastly different, our goals are the same, to serve, obey and honor G-d.
You could hear this in a Christian sermon: If you dont believe in original sin, the consequence of Adam and Eves disobedience, just throw out Jesus and Mary you dont need them.
Essentially, the (Western) Doctrine of Original Sin teaches that somehow we inherited this primeval defect, man's nature is fallen, and that our souls entered the world tainted. It is further taught that Yeshuas passion atoned/reversed the sin of Adam and Eves disobedience and that Yeshua "..came into the world to save sinners."
Hix made the following point in a thread seeking to identify some sort of orthodoxy in MJism (emphasis mine):
church doctrine shouldnt always be taken as true simply because its church doctrine. In fact, I showed several verses that say sacrifice is not necessary, nor is belief in a messiah for the remission of sins. Unless the Bible is self contradictory, there must be a different avenue, a different truth in the Bible that must be applied. Im not sure if I have found it yet but I trust HaShem will guide me.
Some Christological discussion focusing on these three issues could be productive:
1. Original Sin, is it contrary to Torah?
2. The divinity of Christ. Might it be better if MJ represented a middle ground, so to speak? Something like, Yeshua is the Jewish Messiah, but he never claimed to be divine nor is he divine in the sense that HaShem is divine.
3. Should we occupy ourselves less with the temporal human Yeshua in favour of the eternal logos, the Cosmic Christ as Matthew Fox* terms him? Might this lead to a clearer understanding of his earthly mission and to a definition of his divinity mutually acceptable to both Christians and Messianics?
What do you think?
*Matthew Fox is a defrocked Dominican (Catholic) Priest who was excommunicated for his heretical beliefs. Among his many books are, Coming of the Cosmic Christ and Original Blessing.