• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

buzuxi

Newbie
Nov 25, 2003
106
27
Visit site
✟2,265.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
I heard of this book but never read it. But does this book also say there was a time when angels as we know them didnt exist in the OT? For example names for angels such as Michael and Raphael are first found in Daniel probably for good reason as names signified Gods within a heirarchial pantheon. Yet in the Torah angels whether good or bad are nothing more than a manifestation coming forth from God, hence the burning bush is viewed as God, other examples in Exodus 12:23, Judges 6:12-14, 1 Samuel 16:13-14.

All these ideas evolve, the post-exilic hebrew people under Moses never knew of archangels, Moses never mentioned a Gabriel and the evil spirit proceeded from the Lord as did His Holy Spirit (See 1Sam 19:9 ) but by the time of the NT this evil spirit was a figure commonly refered to as Satan (John 13:27).

And yes I know originally Christ was not Jesus actual last name and that there was a time in around 33ad that all christians called Jesus "the christ' just like satan is usually called 'the satan' in the OT but over time within a few years as evidenced by Paul it became Jesus Christ.
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Again, there is nothing in Genesis or any Old Testament thing that implies Satan was "cursed" or anything at all. Satan was an attorney in Job and that's it.

Correct. Satan is certainly not in Genesis. What is there is just a "Garden" variety talking serpent and yes the serpent was cursed. So was the ground but Adam and Eve were not. In the ancient world when a story was told with a moral lesson, it was common to alert the reader with a bit of gross exaggeration --- like a talking animal. Such stories are frequently called fables.
 
Reactions: mcarmichael
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟105,748.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
AMEN: Titus 1:9 He must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it. NIV
 
Upvote 0

AFrazier

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 1, 2016
1,347
389
53
Mauldin, South Carolina
✟283,833.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
The "source" is their existence. I didn't say pseudopigraphical writings have any authority. But they do exist from the period prior to the New Testament. They are Jewish in authorship, patriarchal or prophetic authority notwithstanding. And some mention Satan.

I don't know what relevance this has to anything I had to say. I only argued that Satan is mentioned prior to the New Testament. He is not "absent" from the Old Testament. And he is mentioned in other writings in the pre-New Testament period. The mortality or immortality of man, angels, or devils has no bearing on the fact of Satan's literary existence.
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟105,748.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟105,748.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
SATAN – ...likewise used to denote an antagonist who puts obstacles in the way, as in Num. xxii. 32, where the angel of God is described as opposing Balaam in the guise of a satan or adversary; so that the concept of Satan as a ...distinct being was not then known. Such a view is found, however, in the prologue to the Book of Job, where Satan appears, together with other celestial beings or "sons of God," before the Deity, replying to the ...characterize Satan as that member of the divine council who watches over human activity, but with the evil purpose of searching out men's sins and appearing as their accuser. He is, therefore, the celestial prosecutor... Jewish demonology can at no time be viewed as the outcome of an antecedent Hebrew belief. While the nomadic Hebrews had much in common with the Arabian Bedouins in their belief in spirits (see Wellhausen, "Reste Arabischen Heidenthums: Skizzen und Vorarbeiten," 1887, iii. 135 et seq.; Smith, "Rel. of Sem." 1889, pp. 112-125, 422 et seq.), JewishEncyclopedia.com
Job 2:10  But he said unto her, Thou speakest as one of the foolish women speaketh. What? shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil? In all this did not Job sin with his lips. 
Job_19:21  Have pity upon me, have pity upon me, O ye my friends; for the hand of God hath touched me.
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟105,748.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Num. xxii. 32, where the angel of God is described as opposing Balaam in the guise of a satan or adversary; so that the concept of Satan as a ...distinct being was not then known. JewishEncyclopedia.com
 
Upvote 0

buzuxi

Newbie
Nov 25, 2003
106
27
Visit site
✟2,265.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
There is no belief in spirit messengers(angels) in Genesis neither. The only spirit creatures mentioned in Genesis are cherub which are non angelic. God is in plural Elohim reflecting the pagan culture that permeated. The 3 angels that visited Abraham at the Oak of Mamre are described as 3 men and recognized as God (Genesis 18:1-3). When these three men split up the two are recognized and clearly described as human messengers not spirit beings, not only by Lot but obviously by the people of Sodom who wanted Intercourse with them and the one 'man' that remained and conversed with Abraham was called Lord. The Sons of God mentioned in Genesis 6 are most likely humans, the interpretation of fallen angels is really stretching it.
Jacob wrestling with the angel is only described as a man and then reveals himself and is recognized by Jacob as God himself. And the only other mysterious "otherwordly" figure is Melchizedek. A person never truly explained as to who or what he is.

Yes all these things evolved. They weren't delivered in an instant by Moses.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AFrazier

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 1, 2016
1,347
389
53
Mauldin, South Carolina
✟283,833.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I'm not going to argue with you over semantics. If you want to believe there was no Satan, be my guest. I disagree with you.
 
Upvote 0

RaymondG

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2016
8,546
3,816
USA
✟277,195.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm not going to argue with you over semantics. If you want to believe there was no Satan, be my guest. I disagree with you.
Is it really important that we all believe in Satan? Isnt the belief in God/Jesus the only requirement for Salvation? I AM the Lord and besides Me there is no other. The Lord our God is One.. Is it right to believe that this other person/god exists?
 
Upvote 0

buzuxi

Newbie
Nov 25, 2003
106
27
Visit site
✟2,265.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
No big deal. No need to ponder it even. But if your a Christian you acknowledge his existence everytime you recite the Lord's Prayer.
 
Upvote 0

buzuxi

Newbie
Nov 25, 2003
106
27
Visit site
✟2,265.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox

I think this is a weak argument of the author when taking the Job account. This satan of Job 1:17 makes clear that he simply wanders and goes "to and fro" . There is no evidence he is a member of some divine council that presumably had their "offices" in [third] heaven.
In fact I should be flattered as a Greek Orthodox christian by her entire theory of a celestial prosecutor because what she is describing is not the conclusion of studying OT texts. She has actually borrowed her entire theory from certain demonology teaching of Eastern Orthodoxy.
 
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟119,589.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Yeshua Himself says HaSatan exists. Also, yes there is immortality, BUT, this CAN be destroyed in the 2nd death...one from which there is no being born again from...in the lake of fire...

Ive read “satan” is just a generic term for an adversarial role. " Is that bibical?
 
Upvote 0

jerry kelso

Food For Thought
Mar 13, 2013
4,846
238
✟119,343.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married

jackrt,

1 You don't understand proper Biblical Hermeneutics.
Isaiah 14; Ezekiel 28 and Matthew 16:21-23 are what is called Double reference.
In Matthew, Jesus said, get behind me Satan for you don't savor the things of God. Christ called Peter Satan even though he was not Satan.
Satan didn't savor the things of God on purpose and was using Peter's ignorance of God's plan of redemption.
Ezekiel 25:15-17, God destroyed the Philistines and cut off the Cherethims and destroyed the remnant of the sea coast which would have been Tyrus. Ezekiel 25:16; 26.
Ezekiel 26,27 is addressed to Tyrus.
Tyrus would be taken over by Nebuchadnezzar the King of Babylon which was North of Tyrus Ezekiel 26:7.
Tyrus was a merchant of the people for many isles and said was of perfect beauty Ezekiel 27:3.
Ezekiel 25-27 is all about the mighty sea coast city of Tyrus that God would destroy Ezekiel 27:32.

2. Ezekiel 28:2 the Prince of Tyrus was a man in that day.
Ezekiel 28:9 but thou shalt be a man is future.
Both the earthly prince of Tyrus and the future Antichrist are examples of pride and claiming themselves as God Ezekiel 28:2,9 and 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 known as the son of Perdition.

3. Verse 15 addresses the King of Tyrus which was the originator of pride who was the sum, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
There are spirit beings that occupy regions of earth that influence the physical kings of the earth.
A). The King of Tyrus only was in the original Garden of Eden in the day he was created. The prince of Tyrus had to accumulate his riches.
B). The King of Tyrus only was the anointed cherub upon the real mountain of God. The prince of Tyrus was the sea coast mogul.
C). The King of Tyrus only was created perfect until sin was found in him. The prince of Tyrus was conceived in sin like David said and because of Adam sinning.
Ezekiel 28:16-18 was punishment for the King of Tyrus who is none other than Lucifer from Isaiah 14:12-14.
Isaiah 14:4 is prophetic to the King of Babylon, the golden city ceased is an allusion to Revelation 18:10.
Verse 12; Lucider, the son of morning was cut down to the ground and weakened the nations which harmonizes with Ezekiel 28:18.
Lucifer was the original pridemaster and the only one to rebel against God in the Heavens and get kicked back down to earth and Hell is his final destination for it was made originally for him and his angels who rebelled with him which is located in the lower parts of the earth. This all stems from Lucifer fallen from Heaven literally verse 12. The King of Babylon never did this.
You are spiritualizing as in allegorical interpretation and that is not rightly dividing the word.
Your contextual hermeneutics are wrong.
There is no wishful thing on the real truth. You are the one who has the naive pov.

4. Lucifer was an angel and angels are called sons of God as in Job 1:6.
However, in Job 1:6 the sons of God are God's angels as witnesses and Satan was among them. He was no longer a true son of God in the truest sense.
Satan was not a prosecuting attorney for God. That is absurd.
Revelation 12:9; the great dragon, the old serpent is called the Devil and Satan and the accuser of the brethren.
Job was specific to show no matter what Job would not forsake him even if he slayed him.
This stems from the Great confrontation between God and Satan from the beginning before Adam and will end in Revelation 20:10 in the lake of fire.

5. Isaiah 14:12-14 and Ezekiel 28:11-18 prove Satan's origin before Adam.
Genesis 3 proves Satan was already fallen working through the serpent because he had the knowledge of Good and evil which man did not.
Jesus understood creation and the truth about Satan from the beginning as a real entity not metaphorical and you think he just learned it as passed down from Zorastrianism?
Jews are atheists because of believing satans lies who Jesus said he was the Father of lies.
The Babylonian Talmud was mostly traditions of men and Kabbalah and many other mystic Jewish nonsense are not real Jews just like Paul said in Romans 2 because they do not believe the truth and are blinded. This is another reason they are atheists and don't believe in Jesus Christ as the Savior of the world and divine etc. They believe he was a mere good man and teacher. This is like Islam and Christadelphians etc.

6. Why not put aside false history of misunderstanding the Word of God.
Everybody has to take their responsibility for their sin because on Judgement day it is just a person and God.
Satan already has his sentence of punishment in hell because it was created for him and his angels.
He is our adversary because he is the prince of the power of the air, etc. and we have to put on the armor of God to withstand the wiles of the devil.
The devil is real and was not created by man but God Ezekiel 28:15.
Get out of humanism and intellectualism and wrong hermeneutics and get into the truth of God's word and rightly dividing the word of God. Jerry kelso
 
Upvote 0

Lazarus Short

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2016
2,934
3,009
75
Independence, Missouri, USA
✟301,642.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Maybe you missed the Apocalypse of St. John?

Yes, there is that - the only connection being that Satan and "Hell" (should read "the Grave") are both tossed into the Lake of Fire.

Much more interesting in the Revelation is that just before the judgments of 20:4 and 20:11 Satan is taken out of the way, so you could say that the "prosecutor's chair" will be empty.
 
Reactions: mcarmichael
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
r
Num. xxii. 32, where the angel of God is described as opposing Balaam in the guise of a satan or adversary; so that the concept of Satan as a ...distinct being was not then known. JewishEncyclopedia.com

Has the argument that the angel opposing Balaam justifies a belief in a Satan ever actually been made? If it has, it would be totally illogical since clearly that angel was a holy angel doing God's will.

As for Israel not having the slightest notion of any entity which was in opposition to God from the very start, that sounds a bit quaint since obviously the serpent spoke just as the mule spoke and the mule spoke only because it was being used as a puppet by an angelic being. Even a child can see what that obviously implies concerning that serpent's ability to do the same.

Furthermore we have another direct reference here:

Chronicles 21:1 says, “Satan rose up against Israel and incited David to take a census of Israel.”

We also have references to the angels who are in league with Satan-the demons which are mentioned in the NT as shuddering at the thought of God:

James 2:19 ESV
You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe—and shudder!

Deut. 32:16-17: “They made him jealous with their foreign gods and angered him with their detestable idols. They sacrificed to demons, which are not God —.”

Psalms 106:36-38: “They worshipped their idols, which became a snare to them. They sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons....”

So the mention of Satan and demons was not some new concept that Jesus and his apostle suddenly introduced to the Jews out of the clear blue. In fact, the Jews themselves accused Jesus of being in league with the Devil whom they referred to as the prince of demons..

Matthew 9:34
But the Pharisees said, "It is by the prince of demons that He drives out demons."

They also had the book of Job which explicitly refers to an entity in opposition to God and refers to him as Satan..


We also have Ezekiel's reference to an entity in Eden who opposed and had been debased just as described in Genesis.


So Christians mentioning Satan as the great opposer of God could not have come as some drastic cultural shock to the Jews as some are suggesting.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: mcarmichael
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟119,589.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
He hates man and wishes for our destruction because God loves us.
Do you think these Youtube comments are speculation or false? Either way it is irrelevant.

 
Reactions: mcarmichael
Upvote 0