ChristIsTHEKing said:Let me sum this up for some of those here that didn't quite get it. The Oregon University student newspaper is partially funded by public tax dollars. This means that there are liabilities for publishing hate speech, where a privately funded newspaper such as the independent newspaper our athiest guest brought up is protected under freedom of speech (in our country). ?
So you are saying that (in our country) when you accept tax dollars you no longer have constitutional rights? That is ludicrous, please provide a link to some source that can support this claim. I would also like to see a source verifying that this student newspaper recieves public funding, another poster has said that it is funded through the student activities fee which would make your objection unfounded. Finally, the question of whether or not the depictions constitute "hate speech" has to be decided in civil court. I am not quite sure who would be claiming damages though...
In short, please provide some evidence.
Upvote
0