T
The Bellman
Guest
If you believed you had been orderded by God to do something you find morally wrong (for example, murder someone), would you do it?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The Bellman said:If you believed you had been orderded by God to do something you find morally wrong (for example, murder someone), would you do it?
In fact, morality should be the first line of discernment in recognizing if an inclination is from God or not. The Holy Spirit is not the only spirit out there. Many people have followed the prompting of what they believed to be divine guidance only to find that it wasn't divine guidance in the first place.The Bellman said:If you believed you had been orderded by God to do something you find morally wrong (for example, murder someone), would you do it?
The Bellman said:If you believed you had been orderded by God to do something you find morally wrong (for example, murder someone), would you do it?
I must say that I fine this line of thinking amazing. We are to use our own human, flawed understanding of what is moral and stack it up against instructions purportedly from God? So, if we think something is morally wrong (wrongly, that is, it's not really morally wrong), there's nothing God can do to convince us that it isn't, because we'd say "Since what you're telling me to do is morally wrong (according to what *I* think is morally wrong), you must not be God."Magisterium said:In fact, morality should be the first line of discernment in recognizing if an inclination is from God or not. The Holy Spirit is not the only spirit out there. Many people have followed the prompting of what they believed to be divine guidance only to find that it wasn't divine guidance in the first place.
Which explains nothing. The fact remains that God ordered people to do that which they thought was morally wrong.Magisterium said:As for those who might point to various times in the Old Testament when God commands people to carry out His judgment, It was just that, Judgment.
Well Bell,The Bellman said:To all who have replied along the lines of:
"God would not order me to do anything wrong."
Please read the question again. It's a HYPOTHETICAL. IF he did so, would you do it? Whether or not he would or might is beside the point; the question is IF he did so, would you do it?
I'd also note that to say that God would never order someone to do something morally wrong is ludicrous, when he did that, repeatedly, according to the bible.
Sorry, but you're wrong. Read the OP again more carefully. It's entirely about being instructed by God to do something YOU THINK is wrong. Perhaps, as a result of God instructing you to do it, you change your mind, and decide it's right. But when he actually tells you to do it, you think it's wrong. It's not self-defeating...it's a simple question. Now, can you answer it, instead of trying to claim it's "self defeating"?Magisterium said:Well Bell,
It seems to me that you haven't taken a moment to examin your "hypothetical" situation and it's implications. First of all we'll begin with the meaning of "moral". The term moral refers to a standard of right and wrong. Any standard whatsoever is still a moral standard (also called a "morality")
That said, Christian morals rest precisely in God's will. Whatever God's will is, is what Christian morality is. (This of course is irrespective of methods of discerning God's will.) Therefore, it's a self defeating hypothesis because if God commands it, it's moral by virtue of God's command. Morality has no precedent other than God Himself for the Christian.
Now if you'd like to talk about false ideas of God's will and God's modes of communication or other things, that's a separate discussion. However, your situation, as you presented it, is self defeating.
Well Bell,
It seems to me that you haven't taken a moment to examin your "hypothetical" situation and it's implications. First of all we'll begin with the meaning of "moral". The term moral refers to a standard of right and wrong. Any standard whatsoever is still a moral standard (also called a "morality")
That said, Christian morals rest precisely in God's will. Whatever God's will is, is what Christian morality is. (This of course is irrespective of methods of discerning God's will.) Therefore, it's a self defeating hypothesis because if God commands it, it's moral by virtue of God's command. Morality has no precedent other than God Himself for the Christian.
Now if you'd like to talk about false ideas of God's will and God's modes of communication or other things, that's a separate discussion. However, your situation, as you presented it, is self defeating.