• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Opening up about sin?

John Hyperspace

UnKnown ReMember
Oct 3, 2016
2,385
1,272
55
Hyperspace
✟50,143.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
And what exactly do you know about my "lifestyle??"

That it's not as relatively lazy and lustful as less strict legalists, but, relatively lazier and lustier than more strict legalists? That it is relatively correct in its justification to reject more strict legalism, yet relatively incorrect in its justification to accept less strict legalism? That it's relatively "just right" allowing you to not have to make any real sacrifices and still be able to attain relatively legal justification in your own standard of justification?

I would think that if any legalist really wanted to impress God, he would play it to the hilt, accept my Pascal's Works Wager, and sacrifice his life of comfort to become a hermit in the wilderness. Because right now the Amish are scolding them "Shame for your worldliness and unrepentant lifestyle of lust and vice; lazy and lustful sinner of the world" and the only way to one-up them is to dwell in a cave.

Sure, you can say "My less strict standard of righteousness rejects your stricter standard" but don't be surprised when someone less strict replies the same to the more strict; it's like a legalist merry-go-round, isn't it?
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,522
16,855
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟772,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
it's like a legalist merry-go-round, isn't it?
That God that He is not a legalist.

BTW - legalism is soundly condemned in the New Covenant scriptures.
 
Upvote 0

John Hyperspace

UnKnown ReMember
Oct 3, 2016
2,385
1,272
55
Hyperspace
✟50,143.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
That God that He is not a legalist.

I agree that God isn't a legalist. Bear in mind, you had originally cited the original post as "legalist and self-righteous" in the first three points, but then stated the last two were not. I'm only wondering how you came to that conclusion: how the first three are "legalist and self-righteous" but the last two aren't. That's when the merry-go-round started spinning.

BTW - legalism is soundly condemned in the New Covenant scriptures.

Agreed. Legalism itself becomes the merry-go-round of justification/condemnation of those going round. Everyone in the seat behind is self-righteous; but if you follow it all the way around, we end up back at ourselves. It's the slipperiest slope of all, and slopes only lead one direction.
 
Upvote 0