why do we(including myself) have a need to condemn...something in our faith? (this is to ALL Christian, not just conservatives or people who oppose some of liberal Christians' ideas.)
is to make us feel more righteous than the "other side"?
is it because of what Jesus did on the cross that now as followers we are to take His place?
to spread the Gospel, so we condemn the bad to show the good?
because we are scared of becoming what we condemn without end?
because God failed to show us the full truth that we learn it in progression?
i could probably add more questions to speculate with, but it's just been really big on my mind when i read people's (of all the sorts) threads here at CF in their debates. we have one side condemning homosexuality, then one side condemning pride and arrogance and judgementalism. we have both sides with research, credibility with some standard to show that we are smart that we can justly filter between heresies, we can condemn something/someone, filter the good seeds from the bad seeds.
just something i guess i don't understand. i'm not saying i'm better than anyone else either. it's been programmed in me ever since conversion. if you see something wrong in a believer, point it out to no extent. when all you realize is nothing was really done for anyone, except pointless debate, then you see it happen and you see people with same areas of study/credibility/knowledge, coming to two different conclusions on either their condemnation or whatever...things don't make sense for me.
is to make us feel more righteous than the "other side"?
is it because of what Jesus did on the cross that now as followers we are to take His place?
to spread the Gospel, so we condemn the bad to show the good?
because we are scared of becoming what we condemn without end?
because God failed to show us the full truth that we learn it in progression?
i could probably add more questions to speculate with, but it's just been really big on my mind when i read people's (of all the sorts) threads here at CF in their debates. we have one side condemning homosexuality, then one side condemning pride and arrogance and judgementalism. we have both sides with research, credibility with some standard to show that we are smart that we can justly filter between heresies, we can condemn something/someone, filter the good seeds from the bad seeds.
just something i guess i don't understand. i'm not saying i'm better than anyone else either. it's been programmed in me ever since conversion. if you see something wrong in a believer, point it out to no extent. when all you realize is nothing was really done for anyone, except pointless debate, then you see it happen and you see people with same areas of study/credibility/knowledge, coming to two different conclusions on either their condemnation or whatever...things don't make sense for me.