• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

One God in Three Persons, Blessed Trinity

Jipsah

Blood Drinker
Aug 17, 2005
13,824
4,472
72
Franklin, Tennessee
✟293,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
a lot of Catholics are claiming that no one "gets" that Catholic Trinity teaching "sola scriptura" but rather you need the Catholic documents themselves.
Citation?
Now the fact, observed by me, is that Protestants all too often think of and describe the Trinity in modalist terms, and don't understand why anyone has an objection to it. In my favorite example, my Baptist SS teacher (I know, what was I doing in a Baptist church? Long ridiculous story.) compared the Trinity to: "Grandfather, Father, Son", "Me, Myself, I", and God simply acting in three different modes. I hazarded to point out that modalism was generally held to be a heresy, as was told "Well Brother Jipsah, we have to follow the Bible and not doctrines of men." I reckon he told me!

Anyhow, you seem to be pointedly avoiding the fact that the term "protestant" covers doctrinal positions running acoss the spectrum from DC to daylight. Anything you claim Protestants believe is true of some Protestants some where, and they're all free to make up the details as they go. Catholics as a whole have a fairly precise idea of what they're talking about when they refer to the Trinity, Protestants not so much, if at all.

It might help if you detailed how the SDA understanding of the Trinity differs from the RCC belief, and why. No good claiming yours is better than theirs unless you can say why.
 
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

Jipsah

Blood Drinker
Aug 17, 2005
13,824
4,472
72
Franklin, Tennessee
✟293,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I assume you don’t disagree with the Nicene Creed?
I'd hedge my bets on that one, and I'd wager the ranch on the SDAs not accepting the Athanasian Creed.
 
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,986
5,814
✟1,009,500.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
I'd hedge my bets on that one, and I'd wager the ranch on the SDAs not accepting the Athanasian Creed.
So right you are; the Athanasian Creed came about due to heretical teaching regarding the the nature of Christ's incarnation. While Catholics, Anglicans and Lutherans and possibly some others have retained the Athanation Creed, few other than Confessional Lutherans and some religious orders in the CC know what it is, let alone use it. Most Churches have eliminated it from their service books because the "anathemas" are very contrary to "social justice" and the new wokeism that has infected once traditional and orthodox Christian Churches.

This past Sunday is the Feast of the Holy Trinity and is either recited or chanted in our Parishes annually, as we did at the National Synodical Convention this past week where I attended as a Lay Delegate from my Congregation. Almost 500 persons, mostly men, chanted it responsively with the celebrant.

It is the definitive statement of the Church Catholic regarding the Trinity, and it does pass the test of Scripture alone.

The Athanasian Creed
 
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,370
11,914
Georgia
✟1,094,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I'd hedge my bets on that one, and I'd wager the ranch on the SDAs not accepting the Athanasian Creed.

Particularly since the SDA church aligns itself with those denominations that say they are 'not creedal'.. Which includes Baptists and others.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,370
11,914
Georgia
✟1,094,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
How about this - as an example of what we do not find in scripture...
  • The Father actively and eternally generates the Son, constituting the person of “God the Father”.
  • The Son is passively generated of the Father, which constitutes the person of the Son.
  • The Father and the Son actively spirate the Holy Spirit

The thing is, as any mainstream Protestant theologian will tell you, those three bullet points are an essential aspect of the Trinitarian doctrine. .

Then they too would be stuck in the position of having to argue that the Trinity is not in scripture --

But I find it interesting that you are now affirming that bullet list when previously you said we should ignore the Catholic source that contains them. Hard to follow that logic.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,588
29,147
Pacific Northwest
✟815,369.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others

If your personal interpretation of the Bible leads you to deny the Christian faith, then the problem isn't with the Christian faith but with your interpretation of the Bible.

To post here, Bob, you have to believe in the doctrine of the Trinity. Not your personal opinion about what the Trinity is, but the doctrine of the Trinity as it is. God's truth rules us, we don't rule it.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,688
8,269
50
The Wild West
✟767,695.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate

In this case, the Catholic Encyclopedia happens to be somewhat relevant, although I disagree with it on the subject of the filioque (I believe the original version of the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, and thus maintain that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone).

However, aside from a few topics like this which are somewhat foundational, the fact remains the 1911 Catholic Encyclopedia is both spectacularly out of date and entirely unsanctioned by the current Vatican administration. Unlike the Orthodox churches, which have changed little since the 1200s, the Roman Catholic Church underwent substantial change in the 20th century, and so using a book from 1911, official or not, to discuss what the Roman church believes or does not believe will not yield reliable results. You should use the Catechism of the Catholic Church, which you can find on vatican.va Those are the beliefs which are taught to Roman Catholic youths in Confirmation Class and to adult converts participating in the Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults (RCIA) - so everyone in the Roman Catholic Church who is mentally capable of knowing that information, knows it.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,986
5,814
✟1,009,500.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Particularly since the SDA church aligns itself with those denominations that say they are 'not creedal'.. Which includes Baptists and others.

Bob,

So, if you are indeed "anti-creedal", why are you working so hard to define a "Lone-Ranger" do-it-yourself creed?

 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,370
11,914
Georgia
✟1,094,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Bob,

So, if you are indeed "anti-creedal", why are you working so hard to define a "Lone-Ranger" do-it-yourself creed?

What "Creed" would that be??

"One God" Duet 6:4 in "Three persons" Matt 28:19 -- ???
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,370
11,914
Georgia
✟1,094,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
In this case, the Catholic Encyclopedia happens to be somewhat relevant, although I disagree with it on the subject of the filioque

I am not too surprised that non-catholics will be inclined to differ with Catholic teaching ..


Unlike the Orthodox churches, which have changed little since the 1200s, the Roman Catholic Church underwent substantial change in the 20th centur

Comparing orhtodox to catholic is beyond the scope of this thread - I have a thread showing examples of orthodox liturgy requiring catholics wanting to join the Orthodox church - to publically select specific catholic doctrines and pronounce them heresy before being allowed to join the Orthodox church.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,370
11,914
Georgia
✟1,094,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
If your personal interpretation of the Bible leads you to deny the Christian faith,

Nice story - but that did not happen - as it turns out.

I am sure we can all be grateful for that.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,688
8,269
50
The Wild West
✟767,695.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate

Usually Catholics are received by Chrismation rather than Confession these days, but yes, that liturgy does exist.
 
Upvote 0

Andrewn

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Jul 4, 2019
5,846
4,331
-
✟724,827.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
"One God" Duet 6:4 in "Three persons" Matt 28:19 -- ???
Mat 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

Note that there is one name, not 3 names. God is not a committee formed of 3 separate persons.

I am not too surprised that non-catholics will be inclined to differ with Catholic teaching ..
Actually, some Protestants accept the Filioque, others do not. But the bottomline is that all would accept:

  • The Father actively and eternally generates the Son, constituting the person of “God the Father”.
  • The Son is passively generated of the Father, which constitutes the person of the Son.
  • The Father actively spirates the Holy Spirit.
Those who do not accept that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Son would say that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father through the Son.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,370
11,914
Georgia
✟1,094,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Mat 28:19 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

Note that there is one name, not 3 names. God is not a committee formed of 3 separate persons.

The "One God in three persons" part of the doctrine - is the single area where all sides agree. I take it you differ on that one too???


Or are you focused on "three separate persons" as opposed to "three non-separate persons"?? hmmm "non-separate"

"That they may be ONE as WE are ONE" John 17

You have free will and can define whatever you wish -- let me know when you find a "3 persons are one being" text in true "sola scriptura" fashion.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jipsah

Blood Drinker
Aug 17, 2005
13,824
4,472
72
Franklin, Tennessee
✟293,595.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The "One God in three persons" part of the doctrine - is the single area where all sides agree. I take it you differ on that one too???
Kinda depends on what you mean when you say it, dunnit? The Catholics are good enough to say what they mean. SDAs seem to define it as "not what the Catholics mean". , which covers quite a lot of territory. I interpret it to mean "Protesant Modalism", which as best I can tell is the standard Protestant view of the Trinity at this point. And once again, I think all the Traditional groups find modalism to be untrue.

You have free will and can define whatever you wish -- let me know when you find a "3 persons are one being" text in true "sola scriptura" fashion.
JUst as soon as you proof-text your views of God in Father Mode, Son Mode, and Holy Spirit Mode.
 
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,370
11,914
Georgia
✟1,094,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
JUst as soon as you proof-text your views of God in Father Mode, Son Mode, and Holy Spirit Mode.

I never point to "one God in three modes" as you just did. I point out scripture has "One God" Deut 6:4 in "three PERSONS" Matt 28:19. Your idea that "a person is merely a mode" is your own speculation - not mine.

Others appear to speculate that "a person is not a being" but rather that "three persons are a single being" which is also not in the Bible and a speculation that I don't find to be logical.

"That they may be ONE as WE are ONE" John 17:11,21
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,370
11,914
Georgia
✟1,094,758.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Actually, some Protestants accept the Filioque, others do not.

Filioque -- "the word inserted in the Western version of the Nicene Creed to assert the doctrine of the procession of the Holy Ghost from the Son as well as from the Father, which is not admitted by the Eastern Church. It was one of the central issues in the Great Schism of 1054."
 
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

Andrewn

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Jul 4, 2019
5,846
4,331
-
✟724,827.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I never point to "one God in three modes" as you just did. I point out scripture has "One God" Deut 6:4 in "three PERSONS" Matt 28:19. Your idea that "a person is merely a mode" is your own speculation - not mine.
No, you never point to "one God in three modes" as @Jipsah did. I disagree with his conclusion. Your ideas are more likely Tritheist rather than Modalist.

Others appear to speculate that "a person is not a being" but rather that "three persons are a single being" which is also not in the Bible and a speculation that I don't find to be logical.
"We believe in one God,
the Father, the Almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all that is, seen and unseen.

"We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
eternally begotten of the Father,
God from God, Light from Light,

"true God from true God,
begotten, not made,
of one being with the Father.
Through him all things were made."

The Nicene Creed - The Anglican Church of Canada
 
Last edited:
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,688
8,269
50
The Wild West
✟767,695.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate

The problem is the Greek word ousios, translates not only to Essence but also to Being, and it is in the Nicene Creed, which is the Statement of Faith for this website. Thus the Creed can be translated as the Son being of One Being with the Father.
 
Reactions: Andrewn
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,688
8,269
50
The Wild West
✟767,695.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate

That’s correct. Whereas there really aren’t any divisions between Catholics and Protestants over the Trinity, there are between the Eastern churches, all of which reject the Filioque (Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox and the Church of the East), and the Western churches, which historically accepted it, the movement to excise it in some denominations, for example, Anglicanism, being recent.
 
Reactions: Andrewn
Upvote 0