To put it bluntly, you should care.
Actually I shouldn't, that's like my mother telling me not to chew gum it's bad for my teeth, I don't care just prove how, don't tell me.
If you're using evidence for an argument without really evaluating it (even by checking with a group which by and large agrees with you),
See the context change, all he said was AIG and ICR said not to use it, and I said, who cares? prove why. I don't care for opinions, only facts.
then you are running a seriously negligent or possibly reckless risk of using false evidence.
Actually I'm asking him for the evidence. therefore you with this post
are running a Seriously Nonsensical and Factually Reckless Risk of using false evidence.
Morally, that's wrong for the same reasons as outright lying.
Morally I am in the right to ask him for evidence, therefore you are in the wrong and are advising a possible risk of preventing true evidence from being presented. making it possibily worst than lying but wrong for the same reasons as outright scheming.
It shows a disregard for the truth.
That's what I'm saying to you, you have to be careful with your biased.
Some of the Paluxy tracks are actually outright forgeries.
And Please Prove why? see the hypocrisy,
Let me quote you to show the hypocrisy,
" then you are running a seriously negligent or possibly reckless risk of using false evidence." you have to prove things around here.
Yet you provide no evidence, I could prove why they're real with evidence!,
The Upper Taylor Platform (UTP) McFall Trail
Others (the ones which aren't forgeries) bear only a very superficial resemblance to human footprints, and a much stronger resemblance to the dinosaur footprints around them allowing for natural collapse of the mud into the print.
Again no proof.
God could have created at once, but God has free will, and can therefore choose out of a set of different things which He is capable of doing. Some of the earliest Christian authors did believe that God created everything literally at once, due to philosophical arguments. Because of this, they believed that Genesis should be interpreted allegorically to allow for an instantaneous creation.
He created Adam and Eve out of the dust of the ground and breathed life into them, He didn't create fish who breathed water, and let them evolve that is contrary to Scripture.
Simply positing that God could do something does not mean that He actually will. God could have created people without those odd things we call elbows, and He could have created insular south-east Asia without that odd thing we call Borneo, but He chose to create elbows and He chose to create Borneo. This argument seems to assert that God chose to do everything which He could, when He in fact did not.
Actually it proves Logic and Omnipotence, God is All Powerful and All Logical, there is no logical reason(to even finite human logic) to evolve humanity, making them the main characters, not mention this in The Bible, have billions of mutations and deaths for evolution only to make what He wanted, which is humanity, all when He could have just created them at once.
Believing in evolution over Creation denies His Logic, and Omnipotence.
As for transitional fossils, they have been discovered.
There aren't millions of them because there really aren't millions of fossils of any species.
Who said species, I'm saying millions of transitional fossils of any kind, less than a million in quantity and out the window goes the argument, should be more ape-like ancestor/human transitionary fossils than human fossils.
The fossil record doesn't preserve things all that well, and so the vast, overwhelming majority of all life ever to dwell on Earth has left no trace of its existence. The fact that we have so many transitional fossils for humanity particularly is amazing. Geology isn't always so generous.
Should still be more than a million, if the fossil record Did preserve well than billions, since not as you say, then at least millions, which there aren't.
All your excuses thrown out the window.
