This controversy really seems to get people hot under the collar on the internet.
I've just read "Pleasures of God" by John Piper. Enjoyed it, and he dealt with issues of predestination. Now it seems to me that without him so crudely expressing it he DOES believe "once saved always saved."
Why can't more calvinists be more upfront and less obscure and just use this phrase unapologetically if that's what their theology leads them to?
Otherwise I for one get frustrated by these books.
Also who are these "Friends of John Piper"? Who are they defending him from? I presume those angry people who believe we can (often quite easily) lose our salvation.
I've just read "Pleasures of God" by John Piper. Enjoyed it, and he dealt with issues of predestination. Now it seems to me that without him so crudely expressing it he DOES believe "once saved always saved."
Why can't more calvinists be more upfront and less obscure and just use this phrase unapologetically if that's what their theology leads them to?
Otherwise I for one get frustrated by these books.
Also who are these "Friends of John Piper"? Who are they defending him from? I presume those angry people who believe we can (often quite easily) lose our salvation.
