• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

On what basis Does God Elect?

Hupomone10

Veteran
Mar 21, 2010
3,952
142
Here
✟27,471.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
The Bible assumes that "whoever believes" is available to all.
The group "whosoever believes" is limited to "whosoever believes", ie, the ones who believe.
Only after they believe. Initially, "whosoever" is the part that is available to all.


 
Upvote 0

Hupomone10

Veteran
Mar 21, 2010
3,952
142
Here
✟27,471.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
3) Also how does this remove human boasting, which is what the passage is about?...
Here's your soteriology: "You chose God, so God in return chose you, therefore, you cannot boast!"
Hmm, "I am a loser who only accepted the Gospel because I lacked the worldly prowess to survive without it" doesn't have much of a boastful ring to it.
Dies-I,

I may be stating the obvious to you, but many people who have bought into this idea that to choose to trust in Christ as Savior is somehow boasting do so because they have heard this taught many times from pulpit and book. It is taking a good and scriptural idea - that what a man does in the form of works to earn God's favor results in boasting - and taking it too far and applying it to faith. This is something that Scripture never does. Paul always contrasts works and faith, works and grace. Works (physical actions) are presented as something one can wrongly boast about, but faith is never presented as a thing that someone could wrongly boast about in Scripture. Neither is the decision to believe in Christ presented as something that could be boasted in as though that were a bad thing.

This is, I'm convinced, totally a straw man created by sincere men who believe emphatically that faith must be a gift given prior to regeneration to certain elect people and to no others, and that any other understanding of faith is boasting and therefore of the flesh and not of God.

As I say, I may be stating the obvious to you. But that is why it seems to be such a die-hard issue with some people and why some seem willing to fight to the death over it. It is certainly why your version of faith (and mine) is often presented as boasting, although I have never boasted about having no right to Holy God whatsoever apart from the death of Christ in whom I place my trust.

I'm not suggesting it of any on this site or thread, but no doubt many people who have been thus falsely indoctrinated regarding the nature of faith in the Lord, have had nothing more than an enlightenment from God about the truth of Christ, and regard this enlightenment alone - apart from any commitment faith - to be salvation. Having been so indoctrinated, they will actually run from the suggestion that they should personally choose to believe in Christ as Savior, and recoil at such a thought as though it were from the flesh at best or from the devil himself at worst.

Blessings,

H.

 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
63
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟115,334.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Jacobus Arminus on Faith in God and Christ:


Jacobus Arminus on Faith in God and Christ

What is said here, the Holy Spirit works in the mind to awaken inherant faith by the gospel ("an assent of the mind, produced by the Holy Spirit, through the gospel, in sinners"). This proven true in that "The author of faith is the Holy Spirit, whom the Son sends from the Father, as his advocate and substitute...is the mind, not only as it acknowledges this object to be true, but likewise to be good, which the word of the gospel declares."

While the gospel is the message, the Holy Spirit works to awaken inherant faith in man to the point that: "sinful man, acknowledging his sins, and penitent on account of them."

Arminians do not teach that they conjure up their own faith.

Your right, he taught the Holy Spirit on awkens inherant faith already in man.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,056
56
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,940,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married

Okay, then show me how, from the text, that you come up with the view that God calls those who believe. And where in chapter 8 does Paul switch from individuals to corporate? Also, why us Romans 8:28-30 corporate, but 1 Cor 1 individualistic? What in the langue Paul uses leads you to this conclusion?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hupomone10

Veteran
Mar 21, 2010
3,952
142
Here
✟27,471.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Okay, then show me how, from the text, that you come up with the view that God calls those who believe. And where in chapter 8 does Paul switch from individuals to corporate?

"There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus." (Romans 8:1)

 
Upvote 0
D

dies-l

Guest

I had written out a rather length response, and then lost it because my browser took me to the wrong page. I don't have it in me to type it all out again, but basically, I don't see where you are getting individualism out of 1 Cor 1, either. Both passages address the Christian community as a whole, not in an individualistic capacity. 1 Cor 1 describes the types of people who are drawn to the gospel. Likewise, I don't see this individualism you are talking about in Romans 8, either. Both passages address Christian community, how it comes about, and how it is blessed.

ETA: to answer your first question: "And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him".


In other words, the grammar of the sentence says, "people love God" then "God works for their good". Not the other way around. Who loves God? The church. Whose good does God work for, then? The church. Who is the church? Those who believe and love God.
 
Upvote 0

Skala

I'm a Saint. Not because of me, but because of Him
Mar 15, 2011
8,964
478
✟35,369.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Only after they believe. Initially, "whosoever" is the part that is available to all.



You know there's no such thing as the word "whosoever" in the Greek language right?

Whosoever believes is the literally translation of the phrase "pas ho pisteuwn" which is, literally "all the believing". So "whoever believes" includes only those who meet the qualification: believes. It does not include those who do not believe.

There's two kinds of people: Whosoever believes, and whosoever does not believe.

John 3:16 for example does not apply to the unbelievers. God demonstrated his love for the world by sending his son to save all the believers. Notice the verse does not say "so that everyone could have eternal life", but rather "so that the believers have eternal life"

John 3:16 is one of most particular/limiting verses in the whole Bible.
 
Upvote 0

Skala

I'm a Saint. Not because of me, but because of Him
Mar 15, 2011
8,964
478
✟35,369.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
 
Upvote 0

Skala

I'm a Saint. Not because of me, but because of Him
Mar 15, 2011
8,964
478
✟35,369.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Dies: I noticed you never provided a single Bible exegesis for your strange idea that election is somehow not personal in nature but rather God simply predestined a faceless, nameless, corporate group of people. Then, it's up to the people themselves whether or not to "get in" to the group called "the church" so that they can be predestined.

All the predestination verses in the Bible are personal and individualistic in nature. You'd have to be reading your own ideas into the text to come away with anything else.
 
Upvote 0
D

dies-l

Guest

Well, if that's what you've noticed, then I suppose you are not paying attention to anything that does not support your view. And, if that is the case, then this discussion is all for naught. Your observation is simply not true. I don't know how else to to say it. Oh well.

All the predestination verses in the Bible are personal and individualistic in nature. You'd have to be reading your own ideas into the text to come away with anything else.

Hmm. I would say that you would have to be reading your own ideas into the text to come away with an individualistic interpretation of any of the verses provided. But, since you seem to be disregarding any exegesis that I provide on the topic, I don't suppose that there is much purpose in my continuing this discussion with you. No point in conversing with someone who refuses to acknowledge what they don't agree with.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
63
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟115,334.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Okay, then show me how, from the text, that you come up with the view that God calls those who believe. And where in chapter 8 does Paul switch from individuals to corporate?

God only knows.

But I do know that "election" and /or predestination to a lesser degree was "individualistic in the Old Testament:

"Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." -Jer. 1:6 (KJV)

Now was this a "corporate" calling, or was it an "individual" one, I can't remember?

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,056
56
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,940,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married

One step at a time.

You, however, are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if in fact the Spirit of God dwells in you. Anyone who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him. (Rom8:9)

Is Paul speaking corporately or us he referring to individuals?
 
Upvote 0
D

dies-l

Guest

The context would indicate that he is talking to the Roman church. And, he indicates that whoever is not part of that collective you does not "have the Spirit of Christ" and "do not belong to him."
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,056
56
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,940,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
dies-l said:
The context would indicate that he is talking to the Roman church. And, he indicates that whoever is not part of that collective you does not "have the Spirit of Christ" and "do not belong to him."

So "anyone who" could be interpreted as "any church that". Is that correct?
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,056
56
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,940,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
dies-l said:
No. That is not at all what I said, and I think you know that. "Whoever" or "anyone who" likely does refer to individuals, families, and others who are outside of the church and are therefore outside of Christ.

My bad, bro. I misread my own reference. I see where you are coming from. Let's look at 8:5 because I really am trying to understand where you see this as being corporate without presupposing that it is.

For those [churches] who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those [churches] who live according to the Spirit set their minds on the things of the Spirit.

Is this how you understand this to mean?
 
Upvote 0
D

dies-l

Guest

"Those" obviously refers to people. Not "churches". Not "person". For those [people] (notice the plural here) who live according to the flesh . . . " It could have said "for each person who . . . ." but it doesn't, because Paul was not focused on individuals, but on communities of people.
 
Upvote 0

Hupomone10

Veteran
Mar 21, 2010
3,952
142
Here
✟27,471.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
[/FONT] ok.

This shall go down as one of my all-time favorite quotes from 5-pointers. I hope you don't mind. This statement does a lot to clarify the difference between 5-pointers and other Calvinists, the restatement of one of the most popular general verses in the Bible to make it support limited atonement. This should show readers to what extent we will go to to defend our doctrine once it becomes an integral part of our faith, IOW once our faith and security in part depends on defending it. Once we start looking through pink-tinted glasses, everything has a tint of pink to it.

Having said that, thanks for the insight into the above mentioned word "whosoever" and since I am on a journey of discovery and support of truth rather than support of Self's preconceived or current doctrinal perspectives, I shall study this further.

Blessings,
H.

 
Reactions: MrJim
Upvote 0

savedfromdistruction

Regular Member
Dec 30, 2006
925
42
Texas
Visit site
✟16,370.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

Robert,
what we know from scripture is that God elects. We also know we must repent and believe. Both are true but scripture does not explain how it works. The best thing is to believe both and not try and figure it out. It is like Jesus being a man who was able to die and also being God who cannot die. Accept both without understanding how. What you can be sure of is that election is not based on knowing ahead of time who will accept as that would make God subject to man and at some point having to look ahead to know.
 
Upvote 0