Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You don’t even need to leave Christianity for that. I grew up surrounded by Catholics who were perfectly comfortable “living it up” as long as they made it to confessional every week. To many that’s a small price to pay to have the “best of both worlds,” as it were.Permissive god? You mean, something like Dionysus or Prometheus?... well ya! Who wouldn't enjoy a Bacchanalia or two, or three? Or better yet: the high-life like that which Solomon had! M'boy!
When you truly believe in the Christian God, you come to realize there is a judgment and some will go to heaven and some will not go to heave which can be annihilation (burned up in hell).But isn’t God forgiving? It seems very easy to bypass this Hell-anxiety if you just take on the belief that God sees you as a good person despite your inevitable moral failures. There are plenty of permissive conceptions of God that would be more appealing than atheism if you’re looking for spiritual meaning and an afterlife. Atheism is rife with existential horrors. Let’s not be too quick to assume people are running to atheism as a refuge from Hell.
You don’t even need to leave Christianity for that. I grew up surrounded by Catholics who were perfectly comfortable “living it up” as long as they made it to confessional every week. To many that’s a small price to pay to have the “best of both worlds,” as it were.
I don’t buy the idea that there’s any “true” concept of the Christian God, but if yours were the one I would agree with you that there might be some who wished it weren’t. But to answer your question as to why someone would want to believe in God, I think the idea that we have agency over our ultimate eternal fate is enticing to many.When you truly believe in the Christian God, you come to realize there is a judgment and some will go to heaven and some will not go to heave which can be annihilation (burned up in hell).
I fully agree with you: God easily forgives any and all sinners and wants to forgive them, but accepting God's pure sacrificial gift of forgiveness as pure charity is humbling and people just do not like humbly taking charity.
The problem is not with God's Love (forgiveness/mercy/grace/charity), but humans liking, wanting unselfish, unconditional, undeserving Love. That is who God is and if you do not want to be Loved unconditionally and become unselfish, you would not be happy in heaven where there is only unselfish, unconditional Love. God is not going to force you to go if it makes you unhappy to be there.
Nope.
Are you talking to me? If so, there is no "forever lost".What about for those in deep darkness...would you let your light be rekindled for those who may be forever lost?
Are you talking to me? If so, there is no "forever lost".
You may have noticed that I'm an atheist. I'm don't believe in an afterlife.Yes you and whoever else graces this thread. What is there then?
You may have noticed that I'm an atheist. I'm don't believe in an afterlife.
I don't know. I strongly suspect nothing.
Sounds greedy. Isn't that one of the seven deadly sins?Well, then there you have it.
I believe and hope for more...infinitely more...
Sounds greedy. Isn't that one of the seven deadly sins?
The discomfort that comes with not having an answer to that might be a factor in people’s desire to believe in God.So what is there then?
It’s common in discussions between theists and atheists for the subject of “evidence” to come up. Atheists will often state that the evidence for God is not sufficient to warrant belief, and the theist will either agree and appeal to faith, or they will disagree and provide what they think to be good evidence. The problem is, either way the theist chooses to defend their belief in God, the two parties hardly ever end up talking about the same thing, as it’s rare to see them take the time to agree on definitions for evidence, faith, and God. It’s hard to blame them for this, because trying to tie down a strict definition for either one of these words could send them plunging into a philosophical rabbit hole where it’s very easy to lose your way.
Because of this, when we see theists and atheists locking horns, the discussion often devolves one of two ways: A) into a frustrating, repetitive bout of talking past each other that escalates into lost tempers and name-calling or B) into an in-depth examination of the epistemic tools being used by both parties, in which case the more experienced/educated interlocutor wins by mentally exhausting the other and the subject matter at hand doesn’t even get discussed.
That’s not to say it always goes those ways, but I’d go so far as to say it happens more often than not, at least in the threads in which I tend to participate. While not entirely pointless, these discussions rarely ever end up being about the question that’s asked originally.
I think the fundamental difference between theists and non-theists here isn’t in the arguments they’ve heard, the experiences they’ve had, or the facts they’re aware of. Rather, it is their approach to belief itself: what constitutes sufficient reason to believe something? Is it important for a belief to comport with reality? What beliefs must we take as self-evident before forming the rest? These are the issues that have to be settled up-front or else our discussions will end up devolving in the ways described above. And yet if we were actually able to accomplish that we would probably end up all on the same side anyway.
So I guess what I’m trying to say is none of the discussions we have here are likely to sway anyone from one side to the other. Instead these discussions serve to display how different people justify their views based on their own idiosyncratic epistemologies. The best we can do is point out each other’s inconsistencies.
Just something to keep in mind when you find yourself repeating the same thing over and over and the bonehead on the other side isn’t “getting” it.
Oh yeah, I saw that one went up a week or so ago and I never got around to watching it. I’ll give it a listen at work tomorrow and I’ll see what I can make of it.In line with the parameters of your OP here, have you seen the recent "debate" between Mike Winger and Matt Dillahunty? If so, what'd you think, gaara?
Oh yeah, I saw that one went up a week or so ago and I never got around to watching it. I’ll give it a listen at work tomorrow and I’ll see what I can make of it.
Oh yeah, I saw that one went up a week or so ago and I never got around to watching it. I’ll give it a listen at work tomorrow and I’ll see what I can make of it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?