- Sep 23, 2005
- 32,701
- 6,118
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I am not sure I understand what you are saying here. Please clarify.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Given that the Trump administration has essentially sanctioned a human rights court, this is absolutely nonsense. There is no threat to what the US is currently doing - and if you want to avoid being criticised on this, do better.
I am not sure I understand what you are saying here. Please clarify.
Trump’s Sanctions on International Court May Do Little Beyond Alienating AlliesI am not sure I understand what you are saying here. Please clarify.
tall73 is a 3rd-party idealist. I've had this discussion with him before. He firmly believes that forgoing the choice between two evils (and getting the greater one) such that his personal convictions are satisfied is preferable.
There is no threat to what the US is currently doing - and if you want to avoid being criticised on this, do better.
I think that they started out that way, but they've been pretty clearly co-opted over the last 5-10 years - in part thanks to Assange's legal troubles. The clincher for me was when a Wikileaks spokesperson said in a reddit AMA that they release information per the leaker's request for maximum political impact (or words to that effect - I can't find it anymore, and it may have been deleted. But I was reading the AMA as it happened, and I vividly remember that response because it killed pretty much all the trust I'd had in Wikileaks up to that point).
Even if you discount that, consider that all a source would have to do would be to selectively release information. If, say, Russian Intelligence hacked the DNC and RNC email servers, but only gave the DNC emails to Wikileaks, they're technically publishing everything that they're given. With an anonymous data drop, they have no way of evaluating the biases of their sources.
It doesn't, well done. Maybe you're aren't totally gullible about this. But drone strikes under Trump have escalated - the idea that he is trying to wind wars down (not least when he pointlessly escalated matters with Iran, DPRK, etc) is laughable.
Do better.
And yet you don't wait to see what those RNC emails, and all the skeletons in their closet entails - not that this is relevant anymore, it's 2020, not 2016.
I told you I posted on Trump's killing of more non-combatants, dropping more bombs than Obama, and I have posted on his expansion of the drone program into Niger, etc. I called him a war criminal.
That makes zero sense. One information I have. One I don't. I still have to look at the information I have.
And again, I didn't vote for Trump. So your continued two party narrative doesn't do much for me.
But yknow, bIdEn Tho
Yeah. Biden though. And Bush. And Obama. And all the rest if they commit and support war crimes.
So maybe wait until those leaks meet parity.
Not that this is relevant still, you're fighting the 2016 election, while acting as if this is still relevant. If you were really being openminded, you wouldn't be harping on about stuff from four years ago. But whatever you need to tell yourself, lol.
So now your suggestion is ignore any information you have, AND forget the past of both parties supporting war crimes.
Yeah, I don't think that works for me.
Right, let's keep talking about everyone else but Trump, who you 'do not support' - even though they're all as bad as each other by your own standards.
Except I have talked about Trump. So you are just lying now.
When it's a blatantly biased information environment, and when Trump and his party of collaborators curiously isn't leaked against, yeah, do better than this.
Do better than going on available info!
Tell you what, do you want to just tell everyone who to vote for and cut out the middle man?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?