- Mar 14, 2023
- 1,425
- 552
- 69
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Private
For almost a century it has also been the primary main most common cause of sickness and death.
I CANNOT agree with your assertion.
Modern medicine has almost made extinct, many forms of death that were
common, before the discovery/invention of modern antibiotics and vaccines.
Surgery, was made possible, by modern medicines.
I assert that only a person who is badly out of touch with history, can continue
to say that modern medicine is the main cause of serious disease, now.
---------- ----------
One of the complications, in talking with anti-intellectual Christians on this topic
of modern medicine, is that many modern anti-intellectual Christian groups have
rejected the entire METHODOLOGY of modern science, using controlled
studies and Mill's Methods (of agreement and disagreement) and the Formal
Logic definition of logical causality. When a group throws out the entire structure
of formal logic reasoning, then they do not have the REASONING TOOLS to recognize
the validity of modern controlled studies in the area of medicine. THEN, unfortunately,
they are susceptible to poorly conducted studies, or GroupThink, or emotional
arguments, or conspiracy theories, that do not meet the rigorous standards of
research in the areas of modern medicine.
"Big Idea...
We see Thomas Aquinas developing first cause and first mover arguments, because causality is at the heart of every logical rule (A ==> B). And Thomas was concerned with building a logical approach to theology. We read this form of rule as “A logically causes B,” or “A logically entails B,” or “B logically follows from A.” This logical causality is at the heart of formal logic. And it is this objective sense of causality, that modern Christians (and secular people) have lost.
If modern Christians do not (again) reappropriate the massive intellectual heritage of Christianity, we will be plagued by trivial and ludicrous definitions of causality." [Christian Logic, Wuest, xxiii]
"When younger generations replace formal reasoning with emotions, then they can reach (literally) any conclusion. And trying to convince someone who has left logic behind, why their argument is illogical and invalid, is an activity that does not have a high probability of success. The many examples of very emotional people engaging in all sorts of rioting, looting, and glorying in their lawlessness, underlines how completely emotional behavior has replaced fixed truth in the lives of many people. [Christian Logic, Wuest, xxv]
"Apologists who don’t distinguish between an (unauthoritative) explanation of a doctrine, as opposed to an authoritative defense of that doctrine, may as well be appealing to the Tooth Fairy to lend credibility/authority to their argument. Again, we see the worthlessness of arbitrary “story-telling” to defend the faith. It also underlines problems with using emotionally appealing arguments, to explain the faith.
Without formal reasoning, Christian apologetics is gutted." [Christian Logic, xxvii]
"Can Christian leaders/teachers, who aged in a largely logic-free culture, apprehend what the intellectual heritage of Christianity is?
The short answer is, “Probably not.”
The anti-intellectual or emotional approach to apologetics is very different than walking through the approach of the early Christian apologists (who used formal logic, and logical arguments)." [Christian Logic, Wuest, xxix]
---------- ---------
The anti-intellectual approach (to everything) that some Christian groups use, is
INCOMPATIBLE with historical, orthodox Christianity.
Upvote
0