ufonium2 said:
I heard before that some Old Believer churches do not have priests, and that in some churches the iconostasis is actually the back wall of the church, with nothing behind it. Is this true?
Yes, there are
popovtsy ("with priests") who kept priesthood and various kinds of
bezpopovtsy ("priestless") which vary between themselves from those who have sacraments of Baptism, Confession and Marriage, performed by a layman to those who don't recognize sacraments at all.
Moses said:
What (besides the fingers) are some other reforms that they objected to? Had the Russian Church really fallen into error, or was it just small-t-tradition things?
Today Old Believers explain their objection against new form of blessing so: two fingers symbolize two nature of Christ, other three symbolize the Trinity. Making the sign of cross with two fingers symbolize crucifixion of God-man Christ, so the new form looks like if the whole Trinity was crucified. They don't have different form for priest's blessing as well.
Other differences with Old Believer's justifications are:
-Some changes in the Slavonic text of the Creed
Do you need any explanation why it is wrong to change the Creed?!!
-Spelling of name Jesus: old
Isus vs new
Iisus
Iisus is grecized pronunciation, Isus is original Russian.
-Old Double Alleluia ("Alleluia, Alleluia, Glory to Thee, God") vs new Triple Alleluia ("Alleluia, Alleluia, Alleluia, Glory to Thee, God")
"Glory to Thee, God" is itself translation of Alleluia, so in old form Alleluia is repeated 3 times, in honor of the Holy Trinity.
-Old clockwise procession around temple vs new counterclockwise [edited: I confused two words]
Old manner follows the course of the sun (East-South-West) and symbolize following Christ the Sun.
etc, etc...
and
-Accent in pronunciation of "unto ages of ages": old "v
o veki vekov" vs new "vo v
eki vekov"
I don't know explanation for this.