A terrible 'agreement.'
and the president shows some restraint, you question his motives.
Neoconservatives are more in favor of war, the far right usually dislikes it.The whole thing is a manufactured crisis he chose to get the US involved in. I think he was just doing it to spite Obama and pander to the Far Right. Now that it's gotten serious, he's starting to realize this isn't a game. But I think he doesn't really have the humility to do the right thing and admit he has made a serious error. So I suspect, unfortunately, there is a real likelihood of drawing the US into an unnecessary conflict with Iran.
It’s interesting many Democrats in Congress agree with Putin on Iran being the victim. Sounds like collusion to me. We should investigate to see if this is true.You know you could have some fun with this and start another rumor about who Trump is sleeping with, the popular one is Putin but you could insinuate it is now the Mullahs
It’s interesting many Democrats in Congress agree with Putin on Iran being the victim.
It’s interesting many Democrats in Congress agree with Putin on Iran being the victim.
As long as he avoids war, he still head and shoulders above Bush...
...actually as long we stay out of war, that's a reason to get down on your knees at night and thank the Lord above that we have Trump in the White House and not Hillary or ¡Jeb!. Otherwise this whole thing might well have meant WWIII.
HI all,
I answered in another thread about how the current situation between the U.S. and Iran all seems to be some drama instigated by our wonderful and faithful LIC. He's pushed Iran's nose into the dirt and twisted it around a little bit and punched them a couple of times just because that's what gets his blood pumping in the morning. He loves chaos!!!!
Now, we've had four ships to be attacked, which he is blaming on Iran, but claims it's just a 'little thing'. They apparently have downed one of our drones, which they fully admit that they did and claim that it was flying over their airspace. His response to that is that it was a mistake and they really didn't mean to. Is this man for real????
He goes and gets the fur flying in a urinating contest and then when there are signs of retaliation, he just blows it all off. Really, that's what most Republicans think is solid national leadership?
God bless,
In Christ, ted
You cant start a war because of an unmanned drone being shot down for goodness sake!
thank God this is the first thing he's done right by not striking back, killing unnecessarily, and starting a war
no one killed when drone went down
killing people would have started a war
Hi ted,
Couldn't you have waited until at least the second sentence before name calling? Anyway, do you even understand the logic for why Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal? Not saying you agree with it but you at least understand it. That should include something other than orange man bad.
Here's an article that came out a few days ago:
The One Percent Have Gotten $21 Trillion Richer Since 1989. The Bottom 50% Have Gotten Poorer.
This didn't happen for no reason. One reason the bottom 50% of Americans have gotten poorer is bad agreements with other countries, like China. Fixing these problems means breaking things first. Of course there are other reasons too.
Some history on the Iran-Obama deal.
Argentinian President Claims Former Obama Official Asked The Country To Provide Iran With Nuclear Fuel
You wrote: The One Percent Have Gotten $21 Trillion Richer Since 1989. The Bottom 50% Have Gotten Poorer.
I have absolutely no idea what that statement has to do with this issue between Iran and the U.S.
Why confront Iran?
Iran was working on all the non-nuclear components of a nuclear arsenal. That violates the spirit of the nuclear deal.
Why can't Iran have nuclear weapons?
Asking this question is a little like a Jew in Germany in 1933 saying Hitler doesn't mean it when he says there is Jew problem. How many times does Iran have to say "death to America" before people believe it? In the age of nuclear missiles, waiting too long to confront a problem means you get to die.
But Iran only says death to America because of America's behavior.
If you believe that people are basically good, like Obama does, then so are countries. This idea flows from "equality." They only misbehave when somebody else (read US or Israel) pushes them too far. Hence, the blame for Iran lies elsewhere.
What if people and countries are NOT basically good?
Mark 10:18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
Look who thought people ARE good:
Anne Frank: "Yet I cling to them because I still believe, in spite of everything, that people are truly good at heart."
HI all,
I answered in another thread about how the current situation between the U.S. and Iran all seems to be some drama instigated by our wonderful and faithful LIC. He's pushed Iran's nose into the dirt and twisted it around a little bit and punched them a couple of times just because that's what gets his blood pumping in the morning. He loves chaos!!!!
Now, we've had four ships to be attacked, which he is blaming on Iran, but claims it's just a 'little thing'. They apparently have downed one of our drones, which they fully admit that they did and claim that it was flying over their airspace. His response to that is that it was a mistake and they really didn't mean to. Is this man for real????
He goes and gets the fur flying in a urinating contest and then when there are signs of retaliation, he just blows it all off. Really, that's what most Republicans think is solid national leadership?
God bless,
In Christ, ted
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?