Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Ohh No! Not another transitional fossil!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SkyWriting" data-source="post: 73434429" data-attributes="member: 255843"><p>"Transitional" between what and what? "Surprising intermediate step" between what and what? </p><p>Even the language used indicates that the species are immutable and not subject to changes. </p><p>Why would an intermediate step be a surprise? </p><p>Who are we surprising and why would a researcher be "surprised" about anything?</p><p>What is "surprising" about the conclusions one comes to?</p><p>Is the basic <strong>assumption</strong> that intermediates don't exist?</p><p>Hey! Surprise! Intermediates exist! Do these researchers assume the species don't change? How did they come to hold that assumption? In Bible classes?</p><p></p><p></p><p>And here is a totally different problem:</p><p>WHO came to the conclusion that this was an "intermediate" step? This happens time after time after time that what people imagine to be an "intermediate" step in their fertile imaginations leads to a dead end or is an often occurring variation that crops up now and then when conditions call for it. Shoehorning a step into an imagined series often fails. Especially with just one example.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SkyWriting, post: 73434429, member: 255843"] "Transitional" between what and what? "Surprising intermediate step" between what and what? Even the language used indicates that the species are immutable and not subject to changes. Why would an intermediate step be a surprise? Who are we surprising and why would a researcher be "surprised" about anything? What is "surprising" about the conclusions one comes to? Is the basic [B]assumption[/B] that intermediates don't exist? Hey! Surprise! Intermediates exist! Do these researchers assume the species don't change? How did they come to hold that assumption? In Bible classes? And here is a totally different problem: WHO came to the conclusion that this was an "intermediate" step? This happens time after time after time that what people imagine to be an "intermediate" step in their fertile imaginations leads to a dead end or is an often occurring variation that crops up now and then when conditions call for it. Shoehorning a step into an imagined series often fails. Especially with just one example. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Ohh No! Not another transitional fossil!!
Top
Bottom