• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

So, who will fall for this story line again?

  • Me

  • Not me


Results are only viewable after voting.

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,551
4,976
✟978,502.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Yes, Biden is proposing Obama 2.0 with a public option which is necessary because many states didn't implement a state option. Also, the plan has much higher subsidies that will serve to reduce premiums. And yes, this plan to change Obamacare will cost a lot, $750B, paid for by partial reversing the Trump tax cut. It has ZERO chance of being implemented since there will not be anywhere near 60 senators (not even the 50 needed when Obama used the tax ruse which cannot be used this time).

The key thing is that Biden's plan is much, much better than the status quo, and much, much better than any Republican plan. The plan will work well in the campaign. The plans of other Democrats simply present strong Democratic advantage to the Republicans.
==========
Republicans will oppose the plan as they have opposed every federal health improvement since the 30's.
Democrats will likely support plans that cost 10-20 TRILLION and eliminate private insurance over 4 years.

 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,423
7,157
73
St. Louis, MO.
✟415,046.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

As I said, states can mandate that if insurers want to sell plans in their states, they must provide certain benefits. And all I can say is that in 40+ years of working in health care, I have never encountered an insurance plan that did not cover pregnancy-related medical expenses.

BTW: I don't mean to go off topic. But I can't imagine that any pro-life Christian would support an insurance company refusing to cover prenatal care, labor, and delivery.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
41,723
19,785
Finger Lakes
✟306,272.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In all employer group plans (covering 15 or more persons) maternity benefits have been required since 1978. Not to mention that many states have stricter requirements. Google the Pregnancy Discrimination Act if you want.
Before 1978, there were employer plans that covered pregnancy expenses for the wives of employees, but not for the employees themselves. Women could also be fired simply for becoming pregnant. The word itself was considered not fit for polite company.
 
Reactions: cow451
Upvote 0