Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Obama judge denies Roger Stone request's for retrial amid increasing evidence of jury bias
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SimplyMe" data-source="post: 74746572" data-attributes="member: 9588"><p>But where did she ever talk about Stone directly, or about his case? Yes, she re-Tweeted a comment, one written by someone she appears to follow, about the arrest -- she appears not to have otherwise commented. Your claim of bias is completely empty at this point. She could have been biased, but you haven't shown anything to prove she was biased about Stone -- that she knew anything about the trial or about Stone personally, much less that she had pre-judged him before serving.</p><p></p><p>Yes, she is actively involved with racial politics, and her Tweets definitely show that -- but this trial had zero to do with racial politics. Again, where is the actual evidence that she was biased against Stone, had any clue who he was before the trial, and felt he was guilty?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SimplyMe, post: 74746572, member: 9588"] But where did she ever talk about Stone directly, or about his case? Yes, she re-Tweeted a comment, one written by someone she appears to follow, about the arrest -- she appears not to have otherwise commented. Your claim of bias is completely empty at this point. She could have been biased, but you haven't shown anything to prove she was biased about Stone -- that she knew anything about the trial or about Stone personally, much less that she had pre-judged him before serving. Yes, she is actively involved with racial politics, and her Tweets definitely show that -- but this trial had zero to do with racial politics. Again, where is the actual evidence that she was biased against Stone, had any clue who he was before the trial, and felt he was guilty? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Obama judge denies Roger Stone request's for retrial amid increasing evidence of jury bias
Top
Bottom