Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Obama judge denies Roger Stone request's for retrial amid increasing evidence of jury bias
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Uber Genius" data-source="post: 74740229" data-attributes="member: 389967"><p>you lock them up for obstruction of justice. </p><p></p><p></p><p>"<a href="https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/hillary-clinton/" target="_blank">Hillary Clinton</a>’s aides may have obstructed justice by having her emails deleted, the top investigator for the U.S. House charged Tuesday in a letter asking the federal prosecutor in Washington, D.C., to probe the matter.</p><p></p><p>The computer team <a href="https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/hillary-clinton/" target="_blank">Mrs. Clinton</a> hired erased tens of thousands of her emails, even though they were subject to a subpoena and preservation order from Congress, according to the <a href="https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/federal-bureau-of-investigation/" target="_blank">FBI</a>’s investigative notes, some of which were released last week.</p><p></p><p>The mass-deletion came just days after Platte River Networks, the company <a href="https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/hillary-clinton/" target="_blank">Mrs. Clinton</a> hired to handle her server, had a conference call with <a href="https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/hillary-clinton/" target="_blank">Mrs. Clinton</a>’s lawyers, who had been in charge of going through the emails, said <a href="https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/jason-chaffetz/" target="_blank">Rep. Jason Chaffetz</a>, chairman of the House Oversight Committee."</p><p></p><p>see more: <a href="https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/6/clinton-team-may-be-guilty-obstruction-justice-gop/?utm_source=GOOGLE&utm_medium=cpc&utm_id=chacka&utm_campaign=TWT+-+DSA&gclid=EAIaIQobChMImMLwmtzl5wIVT77ACh18dAV1EAMYASAAEgLO6_D_BwE" target="_blank">Clinton team may be guilty of obstruction of justice: GOP chairman</a></p><p></p><p>So destroying subpoenaed emails is not obstruction of justice?</p><p></p><p>Remember what your fellow atheist Bill Maher said about Hillary in a CNN interview, </p><p></p><p>"“She committed obstruction of justice” by “smashing up phones and hard drives,” Maher said, adding, “Now, Trump did, I think, in much worse fashion.”</p><p></p><p>But that was before Trump was exonerated and the Russia hoax was exposed as starting with...wait for it...Hillary's own campaign, her lawyers, her PR firm and over 51 fisa rules infractions. </p><p></p><p>So I guess if Maher were honest, which I believe he is occasionally, he would have to drop the second part about Trump and just stay with the facts, Hillary committed obstruction of justice."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Uber Genius, post: 74740229, member: 389967"] you lock them up for obstruction of justice. "[URL='https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/hillary-clinton/']Hillary Clinton[/URL]’s aides may have obstructed justice by having her emails deleted, the top investigator for the U.S. House charged Tuesday in a letter asking the federal prosecutor in Washington, D.C., to probe the matter. The computer team [URL='https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/hillary-clinton/']Mrs. Clinton[/URL] hired erased tens of thousands of her emails, even though they were subject to a subpoena and preservation order from Congress, according to the [URL='https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/federal-bureau-of-investigation/']FBI[/URL]’s investigative notes, some of which were released last week. The mass-deletion came just days after Platte River Networks, the company [URL='https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/hillary-clinton/']Mrs. Clinton[/URL] hired to handle her server, had a conference call with [URL='https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/hillary-clinton/']Mrs. Clinton[/URL]’s lawyers, who had been in charge of going through the emails, said [URL='https://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/jason-chaffetz/']Rep. Jason Chaffetz[/URL], chairman of the House Oversight Committee." see more: [URL="https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/6/clinton-team-may-be-guilty-obstruction-justice-gop/?utm_source=GOOGLE&utm_medium=cpc&utm_id=chacka&utm_campaign=TWT+-+DSA&gclid=EAIaIQobChMImMLwmtzl5wIVT77ACh18dAV1EAMYASAAEgLO6_D_BwE"]Clinton team may be guilty of obstruction of justice: GOP chairman[/URL] So destroying subpoenaed emails is not obstruction of justice? Remember what your fellow atheist Bill Maher said about Hillary in a CNN interview, "“She committed obstruction of justice” by “smashing up phones and hard drives,” Maher said, adding, “Now, Trump did, I think, in much worse fashion.” But that was before Trump was exonerated and the Russia hoax was exposed as starting with...wait for it...Hillary's own campaign, her lawyers, her PR firm and over 51 fisa rules infractions. So I guess if Maher were honest, which I believe he is occasionally, he would have to drop the second part about Trump and just stay with the facts, Hillary committed obstruction of justice." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Obama judge denies Roger Stone request's for retrial amid increasing evidence of jury bias
Top
Bottom