Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
NSA investigating Pentagon UFO reports - An "Adversary with that kind of technology"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireDragon76" data-source="post: 76040186" data-attributes="member: 330042"><p>People are too familiar with the phenomenon now so the old Project Grudge/Blue Book approach will not work.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, I've heard similar seeming oversimplifications in regards to the recent declassified Navy material. "Weather balloon/bird" etc. If US Navy personnel trained to classify and track targets <em>routinely</em> confuse balloons and birds for high performance craft, we are in alot of trouble.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course, but agendas don't have to be particular sinister, even if they would be hard for us to comprehend or contextualize. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>US military personnel need to be able to report contacts, no matter how unusual, that that they encounter without fear of stigma, due to the chance that it could lead to novel weapons systems being overlooked. Russians already have supercavitating torpedoes that travel at 200 knots, for instance. And it's possible a hypersonic missile could be mistakenly dismissed as a "flying saucer", since the whole point of hypersonic missiles is that their movement would be relatively fast and unpredictable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireDragon76, post: 76040186, member: 330042"] People are too familiar with the phenomenon now so the old Project Grudge/Blue Book approach will not work. Sure, I've heard similar seeming oversimplifications in regards to the recent declassified Navy material. "Weather balloon/bird" etc. If US Navy personnel trained to classify and track targets [I]routinely[/I] confuse balloons and birds for high performance craft, we are in alot of trouble. Of course, but agendas don't have to be particular sinister, even if they would be hard for us to comprehend or contextualize. US military personnel need to be able to report contacts, no matter how unusual, that that they encounter without fear of stigma, due to the chance that it could lead to novel weapons systems being overlooked. Russians already have supercavitating torpedoes that travel at 200 knots, for instance. And it's possible a hypersonic missile could be mistakenly dismissed as a "flying saucer", since the whole point of hypersonic missiles is that their movement would be relatively fast and unpredictable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
NSA investigating Pentagon UFO reports - An "Adversary with that kind of technology"
Top
Bottom