Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do they have a secret agenda too?
It is really not anyone's duty to give you evidence on a silver platter.
They do! Then why did you not say 'yes' to the rest of my post and instead decide to ignore it. They are logical conclusions after all. Have your eyes not evolved fully or did you read my post by putting part of it in your blind spot (see, I can do it too)?You mean does an Atheists have a secret agenda to disprove God?
Are you really asking me to answer that, that which is no secret at all.
I've heard that cop out before..."It's true but not my job to explain it"
Anyone who can't see through that one didn't evolve fully.
They do! Then why did you not say 'yes' to the rest of my post and instead decide to ignore it.
Note to self: Don't use sarcasm on the internetHuh?
You seem confused, first you act as if there is no agenda, then you answer "they do" have one.
And what that had to do with my answering the rest of your post is beyond me. One thing at a time.
I tried a few links early on but they never convinced me so I refused to waste any more time with them and now ask that others put their proof here on the table.
Can you prove evolution?
This is the part I was talking about. Because your claim seems like a conspiracy theory.There are evolutionary biologists who belong to a religion. Do they have a secret agenda too? Is there a meeting to tell them to join the secret agenda when they pursue research in evolution?
Science can't abandon the ToE; it's "their baby". Besides they paid good money to study it. To not believe it would make a mockery of their education.
I took this book down to the county jail and the boys absolutely loved it, As did I. Awesome testimony and Nikki has reached many with his ministry.After being in such an environment for months one evening while laying on my bed reading Nikki Cruises "Run Baby Run"
I believe you are saying that scientists don't want to accept that ToE is incorrect because they worked hard on it?
Well, have you heard of:
Lamarckism
Mutation Theory
Valence Bond Theory
VSEPR Theory
Bohr's Model of the atom
Steady State Theory
All of these were worked upon, and then discarded because they were not able to explain all observable evidence. The first two are related to evolution as well. Discarded.
You sound like a conspiracy theorist. Do you think doctors hold information or are they not given this information in the first place? That scientists are secretly given a talk on never revealing their secrets because it generates profits for doctors, but not for them (seriously, if someone leaked some hidden knowledge, they would become rich). Or do scientists and doctors have a hidden quid pro quo?
Exactly. Just like
Plate Tectonics
Radiations (we emit them)
Electromagnetic Waves (except the visible spectrum)
Air
The Rock Cycle
Radioactivity in some elements
A reaction without a catalyst
Macroevolution is just microevolution over a long time. Microevolution has been observed. Speciation has been observed. Connecting links to exist in the present. Fossils exist which show, step by step, how life evolved. It is really not anyone's duty to give you evidence on a silver platter. There are evolutionary biologists who belong to a religion. Do they have a secret agenda too? Is there a meeting to tell them to join the secret agenda when they pursue research in evolution?
1. If nothing explodes it doesn't create everything.
Explosions don't create, they destroy.
Nothing can't even explode.
Moreover if there were laws before there was anything, who gave the laws?
2. Life can not come from non life.
3. If fish were to mass suicide on water and birds would grow limbs without flight. That completely defies evolution.
Birds with half as limbs would put themselves in a disadvantage running from predators, so the species would die.
4. A complex structure like a rainforest can't come into existence throughout evolution. If you would remove a few herbivores/carnivores the structure would collapse. Certain species/plants would run rampant. Destroying it. Hence everything must've come into existence at the same time.
From https://io9.gizmodo.com/the-world-is-losing-its-large-predators-and-thats-a-1498088101
No doubt, these predators, often considered a headache, provide essential services to both ecologies and the environment. The loss of certain large carnivores, including African lions, leopards, Eurasian lynx, cougars, gray wolves, sea otters and dingoes, is resulting in widespread "trophic cascades."
Owing to a decline in cougars and wolves, for example, researchers have seen a dramatic increase in herbivores like deer and elk, causing disruptions to vegetation, birds, and small mammals, along with changes to other parts of the ecosystem. In environments experiencing vegetation loss, for example, researchers have observed increased soil erosion.
See? Simple. Evolution is a fairytale.
Hey! Evolution can be really slow! What do you expect a crocoduck!I've been participating in here for a long time now. And nothing changes. Religionists continue to assert that Science/Evolution/whathaveyou is false. Why? Because. They insist that the Bible is literally true, mostly true, true if you read it correctly, true if you interpret it correctly, true but I'm not reading it correctly... you get the idea. They insist that science is a religion. They make assertions six ways from Sunday that Science says, "this" and then go on to disprove "this" when "this" isn't something that was ever stated in any scientific endeavor... ever. They show proof that Adam and Eve, Noah, ... all the gang from the Bible were real and did things that are evidenced in some place, some thing, some way... all of which show that the Theory of Evolution is false. Oh, and of course the "theory" is just a "theory"... that's one of my favorites.
For what it's worth, science is a method, not a capital letter thing. It's just a way that we can use to examine our universe. If what we find conflicts with what you believe then you might want to re-examine what you believe. The evidence that we have found tells us that we have evolved over time. We did not just "poof" into existence. There is NO evidence of special creation. As much as creationists with their websites and museums work to try and mislead you. There isn't any evidence that any creatures came into existence in any way other than evolution. We see fossils of creatures that don't exist anymore. Where did they go? We see creatures today that weren't here in the past. Where did they come from? We don't see creatures just popping into existence. It simply does not happen. So if every creature that exists had parents. And the parents had parents... then those parents/////parents must at some point have been different if there are no fossils of these creatures in the past.
Understand. No parents ever had a child they did not recognize. Do you get that? No dog ever gave birth to a cat. That's one thing that creationists constantly barrage people with. It's incorrect, impossible and false. Change is gradual. Slow. It happens over time and between generations. You die with the genes you were born with. Again, something that creationists don't seem to understand. No creature mutates spontaneously in midlife. All of this, all of it is dependent on life already existing. When you start to talk about how life came into being that's not part of the Theory of Evolution. Arguing that the Theory is false because life couldn't come from non-life... who cares? That's irrelevant. It's an entirely different theory. Then there are the folks who like to argue about where the planets came from. That's not even biology. Irrelevant! Evolution is about how one species can become another species. That's all.
I'm sure in another ten years things in here will be exactly the same. People will still be making unfounded claims, still be creating strawmen and still be ignorant of facts on so many levels. It's a shame. Even the Pope accepts evolution. He says that if God chose to create the world this way then who is he to question it? You all could learn something from this Pope.
*snip list of PRATTs*
See? Simple. Evolution is a fairytale.
Well, technically speaking, I can't prove it, only verify it. But if I were to explain it, it wouldn't be possible on text.
Investigate.
DNA is impossible to form through evolution.
It is a fairytale for grown ups.
Insipid platitudes do not address the evidence.
Ahahahahaha1. If nothing explodes it doesn't create everything.
Explosions don't create, they destroy.
Nothing can't even explode.
Moreover if there were laws before there was anything, who gave the laws?
2. Life can not come from non life.
3. If fish were to mass suicide on water and birds would grow limbs without flight. That completely defies evolution.
Birds with half as limbs would put themselves in a disadvantage running from predators, so the species would die.
4. A complex structure like a rainforest can't come into existence throughout evolution. If you would remove a few herbivores/carnivores the structure would collapse. Certain species/plants would run rampant. Destroying it. Hence everything must've come into existence at the same time.
From https://io9.gizmodo.com/the-world-is-losing-its-large-predators-and-thats-a-1498088101
No doubt, these predators, often considered a headache, provide essential services to both ecologies and the environment. The loss of certain large carnivores, including African lions, leopards, Eurasian lynx, cougars, gray wolves, sea otters and dingoes, is resulting in widespread "trophic cascades."
Owing to a decline in cougars and wolves, for example, researchers have seen a dramatic increase in herbivores like deer and elk, causing disruptions to vegetation, birds, and small mammals, along with changes to other parts of the ecosystem. In environments experiencing vegetation loss, for example, researchers have observed increased soil erosion.
See? Simple. Evolution is a fairytale.
I'm sure in another ten years things in here will be exactly the same. People will still be making unfounded claims, still be creating strawmen and still be ignorant of facts on so many levels.
Science can't abandon the ToE; it's "their baby". Besides they paid good money to study it. To not believe it would make a mockery of their education.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?