I picked one of these up last Saturday. After looking at and reading reviews, and the price ($219.00 plus tax) I thought I would give it a try.
(not my rifle, stock picture from the dealer).
Initial observations:
- Well packaged with lots of thick oil, in a plastic bag, in a box with fitted Styrofoam; manual included (very small exploded parts drawings though).
- Usual Norinco machining marks on the internals, and sharp edges in a lot of places (I'll see how it wears in before I do any polishing).
- The black bluing is very dark, even and smooth, and IMO better than both Savage and Marlin.
- After cleaning and oiling, I applied some Lithium grease to the bolt and the bolt slides, and worked the action maybe 50 times; and it smoothed out nice. There are some wear marks so I know what to
polish now.
- Sights: Front sight was loose; tightened the screw, it's hood is secure; the front blade is square and no contrast, added a bit of high vis paint to the tip. Rear sight had a lose adjustment ramp; I torqued
the spring a bit to provide more pressure on the ramp and it's good now. Edges are sharp, but the sights are visually finer than either the Marlin or the Savage.
- Composite Stock: First off; it felt and fit me way better than either the Savage Mark II and the Marlin XT; I would give it a 9.5 out of 10 for appearance and a 10/10 for fit (including free-floated barrel).
The sling rings are crooked, ugly and asymmetrical (I will be replacing them with screw in studs). The 24" barrel gives a long sight radius which is always a benefit for precise aiming.
- Rifling is strong and defined, and has a mirror finish. Pretty standard crown on the barrel (not threaded with a knurled protective nut as seen in most videos and pictures; I think standard crowning looks better, and I have no use for the thread anyway).
A number of reviews and some of Norinco's own material bill this rifle as a CZ clone; which it is but it is no CZ; however, at about 1/3 the cost, and the good reviews by others, I figured it certainly is worth a try!
I have yet to shoot it, but will report back here once I have.
Mark
(not my rifle, stock picture from the dealer).
Initial observations:
- Well packaged with lots of thick oil, in a plastic bag, in a box with fitted Styrofoam; manual included (very small exploded parts drawings though).
- Usual Norinco machining marks on the internals, and sharp edges in a lot of places (I'll see how it wears in before I do any polishing).
- The black bluing is very dark, even and smooth, and IMO better than both Savage and Marlin.
- After cleaning and oiling, I applied some Lithium grease to the bolt and the bolt slides, and worked the action maybe 50 times; and it smoothed out nice. There are some wear marks so I know what to
polish now.
- Sights: Front sight was loose; tightened the screw, it's hood is secure; the front blade is square and no contrast, added a bit of high vis paint to the tip. Rear sight had a lose adjustment ramp; I torqued
the spring a bit to provide more pressure on the ramp and it's good now. Edges are sharp, but the sights are visually finer than either the Marlin or the Savage.
- Composite Stock: First off; it felt and fit me way better than either the Savage Mark II and the Marlin XT; I would give it a 9.5 out of 10 for appearance and a 10/10 for fit (including free-floated barrel).
The sling rings are crooked, ugly and asymmetrical (I will be replacing them with screw in studs). The 24" barrel gives a long sight radius which is always a benefit for precise aiming.
- Rifling is strong and defined, and has a mirror finish. Pretty standard crown on the barrel (not threaded with a knurled protective nut as seen in most videos and pictures; I think standard crowning looks better, and I have no use for the thread anyway).
A number of reviews and some of Norinco's own material bill this rifle as a CZ clone; which it is but it is no CZ; however, at about 1/3 the cost, and the good reviews by others, I figured it certainly is worth a try!
I have yet to shoot it, but will report back here once I have.
Mark