cgaviria
Well-Known Member
- Nov 23, 2015
- 1,854
- 184
- 38
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Celibate
That wasn't the point of the post. Whatever God is the Son is. That was the point of the post. The argument that brought about the Nicene creed was whether or not Jesus was a created being or not. The Arians argued that He was, the orthodox Christians argued that He was not, but rather was begotten. That's why it is said that He is the say substance/essence/ nature, take your pick as the Father. The point is that whatever the Father is, the Son is also. This is how the creed opens.
I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.
You may disagree with the creed but that is the point being made.
To be honest bud I would stick to basing your theology on scripture only and discard the use of the word "substance". Its no where in actual scripture. I really do detest that document because I strongly believe it leads many astray on a very important topic on how God made things. If you're interested, I have a post I created a couple days ago covering this topic extensively and where I have plenty of scriptures backing up what I have to say. Let me know if you want the link and I can give it to you.
Upvote
0