Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That is a problem for you to resolve, but you do not resolve it by pretending that the problem isn't there. How do you prove objective morality exists? By being honest with yourself. You know as well as I do that the Nazis were evil, and you are just squirming because you don't like one potential answer to the question of where objective morality comes from.
It comes from humanity. Next!That is a problem for you to resolve, but you do not resolve it by pretending that the problem isn't there. How do you prove objective morality exists? By being honest with yourself. You know as well as I do that the Nazis were evil, and you are just squirming because you don't like one potential answer to the question of where objective morality comes from.
It comes from humanity. Next!
No I dont and neither do you, now, that didnt get us anywhere.
Ah argument by anecdote, not exactly a winning formula.There is a (true) story about an anthropologist who was a moral relativist. Then one day she happened upon a tribe which practised female circumcision. She immediately felt outraged, but then realised that her own philosophical position prevented her from condemning the practice.
There is a (true) story about an anthropologist who was a moral relativist. Then one day she happened upon a tribe which practised female circumcision. She immediately felt outraged, but then realised that her own philosophical position prevented her from condemning the practice.
Its pretty good but far from perfect as I think he has a lot of unproven underlying suppositions. I think he also misrepresents where moral philosophy is right now as a science.
He acknowledges that you can't get the topic well covered in only a half an hour talk.
And who should care about you saying "they were objectively evil"?So they were abhorent to you. Big deal, and who should care about that?
They have been conducted on basis of subjective standard.Do you think the Nuremberg trials should have been conducted upon the basis of your subjective feelings?
Do you feel people would care more about my view if I claimed it to be objective?Like I said, who cares about your view.
And how do you plan to solve the problem of people having different views?Who would have cared about it if the Nazis had won the war, convinced the population of Europe that murdering Jews and other undesirables was the moral thing to do, you would have no basis for saying they were acting immorally. In fact, in that society you would be the immoral one for opposing state sponsored genocide.
And who should care about you saying "they were objectively evil"?
Not saying they are evil is not condining their abhorrent politics and massmurdering way.
Evil is a lazy and stupid term which means nothing IMO.
Your post is a giant strawman which only shows that you dont understand moral philosophy.
Do you also think that we can't say that something is beautiful without an objective standard that indicates what is objectively beautiful?
Sure it's "just" our opinion when we condemn certain actions. I fail to see what your problem with that is though.
(Sorry, ran out of Emoji's for this incredibly pathetic presentation.)
You mean he doesn't understand 'navel gazing' don't you?
People from widely differing cultures often render the same 'subjective' opinion regarding beauty (not to be confused with desirability), and that across ethnic lines. If this happens a lot it can be said to be 'objective' can't it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?