Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Nothing wrong with his map. Why should he use a make believe one?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nothing wrong with his map. Why should he use a make believe one?Well someone has to tell Mr. Nye he's got the wrong map up.
He's trying to sound like he knows what he's talking about, and he doesn't.
And he's so worried about how they're going to eat, he forgets Who brought them there in the first place.
What is the definition of science?
I don't think anyone can understand science per sa, unless you mean the meaning of the term, and that isn't within context of your comment. But lets see what your definition is before we draw any conclusion.
If you still have trouble with the term after a little more research, I will be happy to teach you. While you are making all your claims, probably a good idea for you to know exactly what science is.
I did so more than once. I pointed out that over five miles of water would have left some sort of mark. None can be seen
I pointed out the problem of the lack of population bottleneck. Without a massive population bottleneck we know that the population never got down to 8 people.
Please no false claims. You do not even appear to understand the concept of evidence.
What kind of mark? Are you still ignoring the fossils up there? That would be a mark of "some sort".
Not sure what you mean... clarify please.
Yet you do not answer the question? Not sure how I can teach you even the basics here if you aren't willing to cooperate.
IOW if I don't glean what you do from the natural, I don't understand evidence. Don't you think that's a bit arrogant?
And you honestly call that 100% evidence there was no flood...oh my.Just as I thought, through there is at least presented evidence both ways, yet in your mind, for no good reason, yours is automatically correct. You do as scientists do, you deem yourself right, when there is no good reason to at this point. You have wasted my time.
I see marine fossil high on mountain as evidence the water came to those levels, to me that is evidence...have I got it right? At least the concept? And if so why would you make a remark, and still claim you aren't out to demean as part of your defense, like I've been saying all along. If you have a case, you don't need all that. Do you understand now?
To be sure, there was absolutely no evidence I don't understand the concept of evidence, yet you bring on the charge. And it's not the charge that bothers me, so your "too touchy" excuses aren't going to work either. It's just to let you actually see how insecure you are acting. But, alas, the insecure usually refuse to see it.. I can do my part to help you there and that's all I can do.
Perhaps God cleaned up His mess?I did so more than once. I pointed out that over five miles of water would have left some sort of mark. None can be seen.
Perhaps God cleaned up His mess?
Should He have left a scar behind when He took a rib from Adam?
Or was documenting it good enough?
In your opinion?
Then don't display a map at all. Just say the earth was one supercontinent at the time of the Flood and be done with it.Nothing wrong with his map. Why should he use a make believe one?
All the evidence indicates a flood exactly when and where YHWH said it was - world wide, and destroyed all mankind except those on the ARK.We have evidence of smaller older floods. A worldwide flood would have "overwritten" the record.
< shrugs > They apparently were done before they started - nothing in line with YHWH'S WORD, apparently, whether wittingly or unwittingly --be done with it.
But it wasn't. The Earth has not had a supercontinent for 200 million years. His map was perfectly fine.Then don't display a map at all. Just say the earth was one supercontinent at the time of the Flood and be done with it.
I'm sure the audience would understand.
All the evidence indicates a flood exactly when and where YHWH said it was - world wide, and destroyed all mankind except those on the ARK.
Everything known and unknown is in line with YHWH'S WORD perfectly.
Mankind is by definition and by nature wicked liars, evil, pernicious, and always wrong.
So everyone gets to choose to believe YHWH, or believe mankind.
To receive LIFE ABUNDANTLY, or death and destruction / cursed.
Cleaning up is a problem for you?The problem is that it was more than "cleaned up".
Ya ... it's called "cleaning up."Subduction Zone said:If it happened he covered all traces of it.
I'm thankful our grocery store lies daily.Subduction Zone said:That would be a form of lying.
Cleaning up is a problem for you?Ya ... it's called "cleaning up."
We wouldn't want Noah and his family stepping out into an unsanitary environment, would we?I'm thankful our grocery store lies daily.
"Clean up on aisle five!"
And those liars that come by once a week and pick up all those lies I put in a liar bag and set out on the curb need to stop it, don't they?
Thanks for QEDing what that can do to a person.But it wasn't. The Earth has not had a supercontinent for 200 million years. His map was perfectly fine.
What ? re #432.
nothing in line with Scripture to say ?
Thanks for QEDing what that can do to a person.
Sounds like someone doesn't believe the CREATOR YHWH.Making up a fantasy to cover the fact that Genesis was not meant to be taken literally may be considered blasphemy by some. When did the so called miracles end?
Sounds again like someone doesn't believe the CREATOR YHWH.At best the story is a morality tale. That still makes it "profitable to learn from". But it clearly was not meant to be taken literally.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?