Are Catholics obligated to believe in a literal Noah’s Ark? Because I just saw a segment on our news that featured the zoo caretakers and how much they feed the animals. It would seem to me it would be impossible to have kept all the animals fed.
I think there are some accounts that suggest all of the animals essentially hibernated during the voyage, which would've negated any need to feed them. So that makes sense.
Also, there are "great flood" narratives in several ancient cultures. I remember reading within the Epic of Gilgamesh the Sumerian flood myth, though it differs from the ancient Hebrew account of Noah. The Mesopotamian version had five gods secretly plotting to cause a flood, one of them (Ea/Enki) breaks his secrecy and tells the man Utnapishtim and tells him to demolish his house and build a boat from it. Ea was specific about the dimensions of the boat. The story subsequently follows the major plot points of the Noahic account.
A lot of scholars, both secular and Christian, draw different conclusions. Some say all of these accounts are evidence of a severe regional flood that may have even reshaped the terrain and caused mass-devastation of the societies that existed there at the time. Others have suggested these are just a series of myths that subsequent cultures have borrowed from those preceding them to communicate a point about sin and consequences and God's sense of justice.
While scholars hold that stories like the Epic of Gilgamesh predate the Genesis account, I think there's a distinct possibility that the devil could've corrupted the timeline somehow as well as the content of the story. I think it's entirely possible there was indeed a global flood that God used to actually restructure the cosmos because the corruption of sin had spun out of control (not his control, but just as an expression). There are some notes about the natural world in the antediluvian period (pre-flood) that indicate the physical world was ordered differently with features like the firmament. Obviously that could just be the word used to describe a very different perception by antediluvian man of the same thing we see today, or perhaps God really did originally create the world with a layer of water in the sky. Who knows, he is God after all. He can make creation however he wants and then remake it again like he did.
Sorry for the longwinded post but to answer your question
@FaithT, I've never heard anyone other than maybe fundamentalist baptists or non-denominational Christians say that belief in a literal flood is required, binding, and linked to salvation.