Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
No Mr. Pratt, the second amendment is not about shooting political foes.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doubtingmerle" data-source="post: 68235536" data-attributes="member: 6687"><p>Right, we should not mandate diets by law. Nobody said we should.</p><p></p><p>You completely ignored my point: just because something is trending in a direction, that this does not mean it will go that way forever. Just because somebody is dieting, for instance, that does not mean they will eventually weigh zero pounds. Just because a parent limits TV, that does not mean all TV will be banned. And just because people have made laws restricting guns, that does not prove they want to limit all guns.</p><p></p><p></p><p>How do you know gun limitations will not stop at reasonable limits?</p><p></p><p>I listen to what politicians say. I know no politician that makes a claim even close to what you say. And yet you speak with fear of politicians trying to ban all guns. Would you please stop to listen to what people are saying? If you would listen, you would find they are saying nothing about wanting to ban all guns everywhere.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now you are going to quibble about whether the ending of the AWB was a "lifting" or an "ending"? Big deal. The point is that it is no more. There was once an AWB but it exists no more.</p><p></p><p>That one counter-example proves that it is wrong to state the gun bans are universally getting stronger at all times. The AWB, for instance, ended.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doubtingmerle, post: 68235536, member: 6687"] Right, we should not mandate diets by law. Nobody said we should. You completely ignored my point: just because something is trending in a direction, that this does not mean it will go that way forever. Just because somebody is dieting, for instance, that does not mean they will eventually weigh zero pounds. Just because a parent limits TV, that does not mean all TV will be banned. And just because people have made laws restricting guns, that does not prove they want to limit all guns. How do you know gun limitations will not stop at reasonable limits? I listen to what politicians say. I know no politician that makes a claim even close to what you say. And yet you speak with fear of politicians trying to ban all guns. Would you please stop to listen to what people are saying? If you would listen, you would find they are saying nothing about wanting to ban all guns everywhere. Now you are going to quibble about whether the ending of the AWB was a "lifting" or an "ending"? Big deal. The point is that it is no more. There was once an AWB but it exists no more. That one counter-example proves that it is wrong to state the gun bans are universally getting stronger at all times. The AWB, for instance, ended. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
No Mr. Pratt, the second amendment is not about shooting political foes.
Top
Bottom