Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
No Mr. Pratt, the second amendment is not about shooting political foes.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doubtingmerle" data-source="post: 68233145" data-attributes="member: 6687"><p>Yes, if sticks were to be banned for self-defense, I would think that would be a violation of the second amendment, and certainly a violation of reason. Your point is?</p><p></p><p>Is your line of reasoning at all relevant to the issue that Pratt argues for holding guns in our hands for possible use against people like our current administration?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doubtingmerle, post: 68233145, member: 6687"] Yes, if sticks were to be banned for self-defense, I would think that would be a violation of the second amendment, and certainly a violation of reason. Your point is? Is your line of reasoning at all relevant to the issue that Pratt argues for holding guns in our hands for possible use against people like our current administration? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
No Mr. Pratt, the second amendment is not about shooting political foes.
Top
Bottom